They didn’t need to be pointed at the sky to show a flying object penetrating the outer wall. They have had security cameras for decades guy. Banks had security cameras recording 24/7 since the 90s. The military would have the budget and tech to include cameras to protect their headquarters in 2001...
where are these camera angles that you're so sure existed in 2001...
detail them.
we've already established that cameras would be mounted inside the building, in hallways and at entrances... but as we've already covered those cameras are still to this day ALWAYS mounted high (for better line of sight and to prevent tampering) and pointed down.
soooo those wouldn't have footage OF THE SKY on them...
sooo... which cameras are you thinking?
perhaps a camera mounted on the exterior wall, which again would be pointed fucking down, and (here's the best part) would have captured about .0000004 seconds of film as a plane moving at over 500 miles per hour passed under the camera.
that camera?
the camera that would have been fucking obliterated. or at the very least blinded, a fraction of second after the plane entered the cameras view?
that camera?
did you think that footage was gonna crack the case wide open?
this whole "release the footage" dogshit is one of the more retarded aspects of 9/11 conspiracy theory.
it's fucking enraging and embarrassing at the same time.
They didn’t need to be pointed at the sky to show a flying object penetrating the outer wall. They have had security cameras for decades guy. Banks had security cameras recording 24/7 since the 90s. The military would have the budget and tech to include cameras to protect their headquarters in 2001...
holy shit...
guy...
whats the exact scenario you're envisioning here?
where are these camera angles that you're so sure existed in 2001...
detail them.
we've already established that cameras would be mounted inside the building, in hallways and at entrances... but as we've already covered those cameras are still to this day ALWAYS mounted high (for better line of sight and to prevent tampering) and pointed down.
soooo those wouldn't have footage OF THE SKY on them...
sooo... which cameras are you thinking?
perhaps a camera mounted on the exterior wall, which again would be pointed fucking down, and (here's the best part) would have captured about .0000004 seconds of film as a plane moving at over 500 miles per hour passed under the camera.
that camera?
the camera that would have been fucking obliterated. or at the very least blinded, a fraction of second after the plane entered the cameras view?
that camera?
did you think that footage was gonna crack the case wide open?
this whole "release the footage" dogshit is one of the more retarded aspects of 9/11 conspiracy theory.
it's fucking enraging and embarrassing at the same time.