like... are you expecting dozens of camera feeds all over the perimeter of the building capturing the object that hit the pentagon?
and because you don't have access to this footage you're assuming what?
missiles? drone? aliens?
What exactly are you saying happened if not a plane flew into the pentagon?
...
Feel free to answer, or don't, it doesn't matter much.
Either way lack of footage isn't evidence of something, it's exactly the opposite... it's nothing.
Look, i don't know how old you are or what happened to you... but just a refresher... this happened in 2001.
There wasn't cameras everywhere like there are today.
I'm certain there was plenty of cameras setup at the doors/entrances, there are probably cameras setup in the hallways too...
but exactly how many cameras did you expect them, in 2001, to dedicate to pointing up at the sky?
cameras are mounted high for good line of sight and to prevent tampering, this means they are therefore pointed down into the room...
nobody installed cameras on the floor pointed up, that would be 2 extra chromosomes retarded.
THE ONLY REASON we even have the bullshit footage we do have... is because there was a tiny little bullshit camera mounted on the numberpad of a security gate that took stills. that camera was designed to take your picture while you're in your car using the keypad... if someone had been at the gate at that time we wouldn't even have gotten that "footage" because a fucking car would have been blocking it.
We are talking about the Pentagon here. The base of military power in the West. A large target for foreign infiltration. It’s not crazy to assume it’s covered in cameras watching every angle of it’s exterior.
They didn’t need to be pointed at the sky to show a flying object penetrating the outer wall. They have had security cameras for decades guy. Banks had security cameras recording 24/7 since the 90s. The military would have the budget and tech to include cameras to protect their headquarters in 2001...
where are these camera angles that you're so sure existed in 2001...
detail them.
we've already established that cameras would be mounted inside the building, in hallways and at entrances... but as we've already covered those cameras are still to this day ALWAYS mounted high (for better line of sight and to prevent tampering) and pointed down.
soooo those wouldn't have footage OF THE SKY on them...
sooo... which cameras are you thinking?
perhaps a camera mounted on the exterior wall, which again would be pointed fucking down, and (here's the best part) would have captured about .0000004 seconds of film as a plane moving at over 500 miles per hour passed under the camera.
that camera?
the camera that would have been fucking obliterated. or at the very least blinded, a fraction of second after the plane entered the cameras view?
that camera?
did you think that footage was gonna crack the case wide open?
this whole "release the footage" dogshit is one of the more retarded aspects of 9/11 conspiracy theory.
it's fucking enraging and embarrassing at the same time.
They took the camera footage because they don't want people to see what is on them. If there was no reason to take it because they were not pointing in the correct directions and at the right time, they wouldn't have taken it. They didn't take security tapes from New Jersey gas stations pointing toward Canada. They didn't take tapes from every business in DC that had a camera, either. And they have never given the owners of the tapes their property back, because "National Security." Who are you trying to fool here? Me or yourself? If you're trying to shill, you need to do way better than that.
they took the camera footage because it was the largest attack on american soil... it's called gathering evidence.
just because they didn't share the intimate details of the forensic audit of every single second of area security camera footage... doesn't mean they are hiding a multi camera shoot of DB cooper flying patriot missiles into giant barrels of thermite paint.
they always take the footage hoping something is on there.
they even take ATM cameras.
also... who in the fuck is asking for the camera footage back? unless they had a camera pointed at the sky, AND WHY IN THE FUCK WOULD THEY, there is not a god damned thing on them.
you show me the interview or even the claim from a credible witness that says "i have a security camera pointed at the sky that captured the video of the (insert whatever the fuck you think it was) and the government won't give it back".
i'll wait.
USE CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS... what in the fuck is a more likely scenario here?
the fact that you won't even entertain the most simple and basic explanation for the whole thing should be a fucking alarm clock blaring into your ears that something is very very wrong with your theory.
seriously... what is more likely...
cameras are never pointed at the sky to record nothing 99.99999999999 % of the time.
or...
whatever the fuck you have convinced yourself into believing.
"pentagon footage"
exactly what are you expecting here?
like... are you expecting dozens of camera feeds all over the perimeter of the building capturing the object that hit the pentagon?
and because you don't have access to this footage you're assuming what?
missiles? drone? aliens?
What exactly are you saying happened if not a plane flew into the pentagon?
...
Feel free to answer, or don't, it doesn't matter much.
Either way lack of footage isn't evidence of something, it's exactly the opposite... it's nothing.
Look, i don't know how old you are or what happened to you... but just a refresher... this happened in 2001.
There wasn't cameras everywhere like there are today.
I'm certain there was plenty of cameras setup at the doors/entrances, there are probably cameras setup in the hallways too...
but exactly how many cameras did you expect them, in 2001, to dedicate to pointing up at the sky?
cameras are mounted high for good line of sight and to prevent tampering, this means they are therefore pointed down into the room...
nobody installed cameras on the floor pointed up, that would be 2 extra chromosomes retarded.
THE ONLY REASON we even have the bullshit footage we do have... is because there was a tiny little bullshit camera mounted on the numberpad of a security gate that took stills. that camera was designed to take your picture while you're in your car using the keypad... if someone had been at the gate at that time we wouldn't even have gotten that "footage" because a fucking car would have been blocking it.
again... what exactly were you expecting?
1080p w/ sound?
of the sky?
We are talking about the Pentagon here. The base of military power in the West. A large target for foreign infiltration. It’s not crazy to assume it’s covered in cameras watching every angle of it’s exterior.
seriously though... 2001... and you expect them to have had dedicated cameras pointing towards the sky.
Come on man you know thats just silly.
Beyond that you're also assuming all those businesses that the FBI/cops sized footage from would have also had cameras pointed skyward...
There was nothing on the cameras as should be expected because there would have been ZERO reason to point cameras at the sky.
Quite frankly, if they would have said "hey lookie here we've got perfect security cam video of the plane flying into the pentagon"...
THAT is when you should have been suspicious...
...again because cameras don't work that way.
They didn’t need to be pointed at the sky to show a flying object penetrating the outer wall. They have had security cameras for decades guy. Banks had security cameras recording 24/7 since the 90s. The military would have the budget and tech to include cameras to protect their headquarters in 2001...
holy shit...
guy...
whats the exact scenario you're envisioning here?
where are these camera angles that you're so sure existed in 2001...
detail them.
we've already established that cameras would be mounted inside the building, in hallways and at entrances... but as we've already covered those cameras are still to this day ALWAYS mounted high (for better line of sight and to prevent tampering) and pointed down.
soooo those wouldn't have footage OF THE SKY on them...
sooo... which cameras are you thinking?
perhaps a camera mounted on the exterior wall, which again would be pointed fucking down, and (here's the best part) would have captured about .0000004 seconds of film as a plane moving at over 500 miles per hour passed under the camera.
that camera?
the camera that would have been fucking obliterated. or at the very least blinded, a fraction of second after the plane entered the cameras view?
that camera?
did you think that footage was gonna crack the case wide open?
this whole "release the footage" dogshit is one of the more retarded aspects of 9/11 conspiracy theory.
it's fucking enraging and embarrassing at the same time.
They took the camera footage because they don't want people to see what is on them. If there was no reason to take it because they were not pointing in the correct directions and at the right time, they wouldn't have taken it. They didn't take security tapes from New Jersey gas stations pointing toward Canada. They didn't take tapes from every business in DC that had a camera, either. And they have never given the owners of the tapes their property back, because "National Security." Who are you trying to fool here? Me or yourself? If you're trying to shill, you need to do way better than that.
thats ridiculous bullshit.
they took the camera footage because it was the largest attack on american soil... it's called gathering evidence.
just because they didn't share the intimate details of the forensic audit of every single second of area security camera footage... doesn't mean they are hiding a multi camera shoot of DB cooper flying patriot missiles into giant barrels of thermite paint.
they always take the footage hoping something is on there.
they even take ATM cameras.
also... who in the fuck is asking for the camera footage back? unless they had a camera pointed at the sky, AND WHY IN THE FUCK WOULD THEY, there is not a god damned thing on them.
you show me the interview or even the claim from a credible witness that says "i have a security camera pointed at the sky that captured the video of the (insert whatever the fuck you think it was) and the government won't give it back".
i'll wait.
USE CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS... what in the fuck is a more likely scenario here?
the fact that you won't even entertain the most simple and basic explanation for the whole thing should be a fucking alarm clock blaring into your ears that something is very very wrong with your theory.
seriously... what is more likely...
cameras are never pointed at the sky to record nothing 99.99999999999 % of the time.
or...
whatever the fuck you have convinced yourself into believing.
Shill any harder and you're gonna have a stroke dude.
Take your ignorance to reddit. We know you.
you don't "know me" larper faggot.
fuck reddit, and fuck you.