Nope the sheeple argument doesn’t work especially if they want the total population down get rid of majority of sheep first the easy ones. Bolsheviks killed their revolutionists in the beginning when they were done with them the useful idiots. Also an argument I prefer is vaccines end up making us sicker which means more money for pharma.
For those who had the same idea, these are the counter arguments:
-It is possible that not all the vaccines are real, some might be placebo, this means they can keep the right amount of sheeple they need.
-The jewish rabbis in control might be going for thinning the herd to as low as 500 million, that means getting rid of A LOT of people which includes most of the sheeple. Later they can have other ways to deal with those who refuse the vaccine.
-There are a lot of possibilities for what the vaccines are for.
*Vaccine introduction could be a boil the frog strategy, where those initial vaccines do not kill that many, but later when years pass and people are not fighting them that much and resistance dies down, they start killing more and more
*Vaccines could be about an identification, could be about facilitating control through some sort of radio waves.
*Vaccines could be about only culling the weak and the elderly or shortening their life spans and not 100% lethal.
-Also a possibility is that the economic fallouts for those who do not want to vaccinate means they will be culled in the long term. Can't have a family if you cannot find a job because you refuse to vaccinate.
Most importantly of all, anyone who gets the jab is giving away all of his sovereignty to government (to the jew) and is giving government the ability to decide what to do with his life.
lmao what an idiot
he doesnt have any argument other than it lets him ignore the whole issue.
Nor does anyone believe the shots are a certainty of death.
the primary profit motives are just ignored
Nope the sheeple argument doesn’t work especially if they want the total population down get rid of majority of sheep first the easy ones. Bolsheviks killed their revolutionists in the beginning when they were done with them the useful idiots. Also an argument I prefer is vaccines end up making us sicker which means more money for pharma.
Burr cucked so hard. One minute he is calling out Hillary for dressing as a yak at eyes wide shut parties now he is berating who he once was.
He got scared straight
For those who had the same idea, these are the counter arguments:
-It is possible that not all the vaccines are real, some might be placebo, this means they can keep the right amount of sheeple they need.
-The jewish rabbis in control might be going for thinning the herd to as low as 500 million, that means getting rid of A LOT of people which includes most of the sheeple. Later they can have other ways to deal with those who refuse the vaccine.
-There are a lot of possibilities for what the vaccines are for. *Vaccine introduction could be a boil the frog strategy, where those initial vaccines do not kill that many, but later when years pass and people are not fighting them that much and resistance dies down, they start killing more and more *Vaccines could be about an identification, could be about facilitating control through some sort of radio waves. *Vaccines could be about only culling the weak and the elderly or shortening their life spans and not 100% lethal.
-Also a possibility is that the economic fallouts for those who do not want to vaccinate means they will be culled in the long term. Can't have a family if you cannot find a job because you refuse to vaccinate.
Most importantly of all, anyone who gets the jab is giving away all of his sovereignty to government (to the jew) and is giving government the ability to decide what to do with his life.
lmao what an idiot he doesnt have any argument other than it lets him ignore the whole issue. Nor does anyone believe the shots are a certainty of death.
the primary profit motives are just ignored