Just like wtc 7 ?
(youtu.be)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (7)
sorted by:
This is precisely why the buildings in New York were demolished. They did NOT want skyscraper dominoes.
I think the take away should be .. the bottoms of the buildings were blown up. But the rest of the structure didn't just collapse into oblivion. It offered actual resistance. So much so the collapse stopped and they just fell over instead.
These are failed demolitions. You seem to be arguing that this proves buildings can't be demolished properly.
No. Buildings can be demolished just fine. NIST in their explanation of wtc7 only described collapse initiation. They failed to explain why the rest of the building collapsed into the ground at essentially free fall speeds. Well in these videos we have collapse initiation caused by controlled demolition. But since they either didn't wire the whole building or some charges failed the collapse actually stops, which is a similar outcome to what you would expect. Wtc7 was a complete anomaly that violates the basic laws of physics if you try apply the 'official' story to it.
Thank you for that explanation!