It's a long shot but human females are born with all the eggs they are ever going to produce so potentially, we might not see the effects for nearly two decades.
Tons of women complaining about early and extended bleeding with their periods after getting the shot. I wonder how much of that is their eggs sloughing out and their fertility vanishing.
Tony “The Rat” Fauci acts quite sure that it won’t alter DNA, but nobody knows.
‘David Baltimore, a virologist at the California Institute of Technology who won the Nobel Prize for his role in discovering RT, describes the new work as “impressive” and the findings as “unexpected” but he notes that Jaenisch and colleagues only show that fragments of SARS-CoV-2’s genome integrate. “Because it is all pieces of the coronaviral genome, it can’t lead to infectious RNA or DNA and therefore it is probably biologically a dead end,” Baltimore says. “It is also not clear if, in people, the cells that harbor the reverse transcripts stay around for a long time or they die. The work raises a lot of interesting questions.”‘
I know. The point is that people like Fauci act like you are scientifically illiterate for suggesting that mRNA could be incorporated into your genome.
Dr. Doug Corrigan has written about why the vaccine could be more problematic than infection in this regard:
The vx package insert also advises people of reproductive age to have a consultation w/ a fertility clinic if they plan on having children.
And while their at it, to freeze their gametes ... for no real reason.
Of course fertility treatments are not normally covered by employer insurance (at least in the U.S.).
10.4.1. Male Participant Reproductive Inclusion Criteria
Male participants are eligible to participate if they agree to the following requirements during
the intervention period and for at least **28 days after **the last dose of study intervention
I will say that I have done many clinical trials. I made a good tax free living doing it for a couple years.
What I am seeing here is standard language in any clinical trial paperwork, especially if its focus is an experimental drug. This in itself is not significant.
It's not likely indicative that it will change your DNA, but that a side effect of the Antibodies it gives you is potential reproductive damage.
There are a ton of ways you can damage some one's reproductive system permanently, and any potential offspring, without modifying DNA.
Always fun to see Children of Men coming true
I'm going to end up like Michael Caine in that movie, with my own small cabin in the woods growing weed and hiding from the man.
It's a long shot but human females are born with all the eggs they are ever going to produce so potentially, we might not see the effects for nearly two decades.
Tons of women complaining about early and extended bleeding with their periods after getting the shot. I wonder how much of that is their eggs sloughing out and their fertility vanishing.
Guess we'll find out in the next year or so.
Do you think I put myself at risk of vaccine exposure by having sex with a vaxxed girl??
There's no risk of you having sex
Well you put your USB drive in to a computer that has malware
My thought exactly. How do we know for sure that internal physical contact like that doesn’t pose a risk??
Tony “The Rat” Fauci acts quite sure that it won’t alter DNA, but nobody knows.
‘David Baltimore, a virologist at the California Institute of Technology who won the Nobel Prize for his role in discovering RT, describes the new work as “impressive” and the findings as “unexpected” but he notes that Jaenisch and colleagues only show that fragments of SARS-CoV-2’s genome integrate. “Because it is all pieces of the coronaviral genome, it can’t lead to infectious RNA or DNA and therefore it is probably biologically a dead end,” Baltimore says. “It is also not clear if, in people, the cells that harbor the reverse transcripts stay around for a long time or they die. The work raises a lot of interesting questions.”‘
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/12/coronavirus-may-sometimes-slip-its-genetic-material-human-chromosomes-what-does-mean
I know. The point is that people like Fauci act like you are scientifically illiterate for suggesting that mRNA could be incorporated into your genome.
Dr. Doug Corrigan has written about why the vaccine could be more problematic than infection in this regard:
https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2020/11/27/will-an-rna-vaccine-permanently-alter-my-dna/
https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2021/02/15/breaking-study-sheds-more-light-on-whether-an-rna-vaccine-can-permanently-alter-dna/
What is a WOCBP
Women of child bearing potential
Oh lol thanks... I was like what is bp mean after women of color.... I've been indoctrinated nooooo
“Male condom” Wait what’s a female condom? Lol
Diaphragm?
It's what Caitlyn Jenner wears when he fucks his lesbian partner.
Had to just connect the dots on that and holy shit you are onto something
Outrageous! This is big trouble.
Test Subject: "Absolutely outrageous!"
Scientist: "Here's $10,000 for your services."
Test Subject: "WOO-HOO!!!"
PDF link, please?
No log in, direct download when you click:https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf
That's better!
Thank you!
One that doesn't require google or Facebook?
The vx package insert also advises people of reproductive age to have a consultation w/ a fertility clinic if they plan on having children.
And while their at it, to freeze their gametes ... for no real reason.
Of course fertility treatments are not normally covered by employer insurance (at least in the U.S.).
That’s not what it says. It says, in layman’s terms, it doesn’t want women who could get pregnant during the period of the study (28 days).
Men, it says exactly:
10.4.1. Male Participant Reproductive Inclusion Criteria
Male participants are eligible to participate if they agree to the following requirements during the intervention period and for at least **28 days after **the last dose of study intervention
Lay woman's terms
I will say that I have done many clinical trials. I made a good tax free living doing it for a couple years.
What I am seeing here is standard language in any clinical trial paperwork, especially if its focus is an experimental drug. This in itself is not significant.
Watch for a rise in female infertility within the next few years and the news media labeling it as an "unexplained rise" in their headlines.
28 days
Can I get a link to the full document?
https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf