PRETENSE, noun. [Latin proetensus, proetendo.] - "a holding out or offering to others something false"
Does nature offer false information? No. So how could ONE within ALL offer something false? Could it be that ONEs choice of ignoring nature; causes corruption of comprehension within ONEself to believe in the sattes of truth/false?
moron
Latin moror - "to delay, stop, hinder". ALL is within motion; ONE cannot delay, stop or hinder" the motion of ALL; only corrupt ONEself through ignorance by free will of choice.
Can existence be without meaning? If the intent/function of ALL existence is self sustenance; then how could anything/anyONE within have no meaning? Could this once again be an act of ignorance of ONE within to believe in meaninglessness aka nothing within everything?
Sounds like the usual inversion at play.
You're
Passing judgment onto others; while ignoring sole authority over self.
out of us
Speaking in the name of others; while ignoring sole authority over self.
outro
Doesn't making yet another Intro contradicts that? Could it be free will of choice allowing you to do it anyway?
A'CHING, participle present tense - "being in pain; suffering distress".
Lesson here...suggested digital text can cause perceived pain and suffering. Imagine ONE would weaponize words as suggestion to cause that within others. Maybe "spell-craft" would be a fitting term for such a devious scheme...
no one cares
If one proclaims in the name of others, while pretending, without consent, to be the authority above them; then what are the implications for the ONE doing it?
Again...
...the outro made an intro because of free will of choice.
I doubt that you can hear me.
PRETENSE, noun. [Latin proetensus, proetendo.] - "a holding out or offering to others something false"
Does nature offer false information? No. So how could ONE within ALL offer something false? Could it be that ONEs choice of ignoring nature; causes corruption of comprehension within ONEself to believe in the sattes of truth/false?
Latin moror - "to delay, stop, hinder". ALL is within motion; ONE cannot delay, stop or hinder" the motion of ALL; only corrupt ONEself through ignorance by free will of choice.
Intro: free will of choice
Outro: adherence to self sustenance or ignorance
No one cares about your little dictionary gimmick. Your posts are meaningless drivel. You're boring the shit out of us, incel.
Literally a made-up post-WWII propaganda term for deception... https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=gimmick&year_start=1500&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3#
Can existence be without meaning? If the intent/function of ALL existence is self sustenance; then how could anything/anyONE within have no meaning? Could this once again be an act of ignorance of ONE within to believe in meaninglessness aka nothing within everything?
Sounds like the usual inversion at play.
Passing judgment onto others; while ignoring sole authority over self.
Speaking in the name of others; while ignoring sole authority over self.
Doesn't making yet another Intro contradicts that? Could it be free will of choice allowing you to do it anyway?
Again, no one cares. Your gimmick is so achingly autistic.
More stolen propaganda terms... https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=autistic&year_start=1500&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3#
A'CHING, participle present tense - "being in pain; suffering distress".
Lesson here...suggested digital text can cause perceived pain and suffering. Imagine ONE would weaponize words as suggestion to cause that within others. Maybe "spell-craft" would be a fitting term for such a devious scheme...
If one proclaims in the name of others, while pretending, without consent, to be the authority above them; then what are the implications for the ONE doing it?
...the outro made an intro because of free will of choice.