Flat earth gets downvoted like no other. This is literally the mother of all conspiracies. Mix of Deepstate troll farms and heavily indoctrinated Normies who can't see through the lies. That is all.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (124)
sorted by:
Look, more copypasta from the fake Christian!
Skimming over can't answer all questions driving. Ice wall keeps it all in the water. How can an atmosphere exist besides a vacuum of space without a solid barrier, it can't. Satellite's question there is so much proof of the impossibility of this I suggest you watch one of my previous posts of international flat earth conference about the impossibility of light from the sun and moon he discusses the ISS, go learn. NASA, always over budget and behind schedule despite any cuts. 300+ billion per year hardly a cut. Coriolis effect not taken into account for military sniping or artillery despite the claims, and toilets flow both ways despite the claims go test this yourself in your sink it is a farce. Old claims it were a sphere from back in the day were not necessarily of bad faith, just theories, there were also sun worshippers way back in the day that could of wanted to create a mathematical model to support the sun as being the center. Other "Planets" are not like earth they are self illuminating luminaries with no Land there, and there is no proof they are actually spheres either. They do not receive sunlight from our sun, it is impossible based on how bright they appear, also in that video linked. I'll try to get back to your other questions
My sense of morality begrudgingly tells you not to endanger yourself. I don’t expect a quick answer; I just want a real one.
Covered that; how’d they prevent all water from disappearing before they formed?
Gravity.
Or you could look up at sunset.
Just answer.
Maybe they should stop cutting the budget and changing the plan every four years, then.
It is, though.
Did; flowed one way.
And were proven true.
Why.
Their physical motion proves it.
Which explains why they have phases… right?
Learn literally anything about the inverse square law.
Again, don’t rush.
Wow, you've given up, but follow NASA budgeting now?
That's really weird!
You should actually learn the inverse square law and you'll see what I'm saying about the impossibility of the brightness of the self luminous planets that don't receive sunlight. Go learn and apply it correctly. Will get back to you though on the rest of your points just wanted to state that real quick.
It doesn’t work when your “sun” is only a couple miles across. It does when it’s ~950,000 miles across, though.