I was so upset at first that trump set us up on the 6th Jan to get our guns. But now I'm questioning if it's a good thing, once the forced vaccine start. I don't want to many people around my with guns, once the taxing normal people out of cars, plains and then food, I don't want to many people to have guns then. Did trump do this to help us in the dark winter coming.?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (178)
sorted by:
Dude, seriously, what’s your fascination with Trump? What exactly beyond repeatedly supporting the NRA and warning us Joe was coming for guns did he do? How was Jan 6 a super secret plot to steal guns when no protestors were armed and they were explicitly told not to bring weapons by organizers.
I get it, you hate Trump because you are so outraged someone actually had the balls to call out career politicians for their hypocrisy, and he failed to fix it because organizations like the DNC, GOP with help from the CIA, FBI and media managed to keep the guy tied up in partisan legal accusations for 4 years, and instead of being pissed off that these groups preferred frivolous legal charges over allowing a duly elected president to actually work to the betterment of the USA, you are angry that Trump said stuff that the press didn’t like.
This is a .win site, so who did you expect political support to weigh in favour of? Jill Stein maybe?
Honestly, if you are going to go on and on and on about Trump with daily posts, make supporting statements and provide sources otherwise your arguments come down to sad feelings and personal outrage. It’s tiring.
I would love to argue second amendment and Trump with you all day long but for fucks sake my dude, if you are going to say Trump plotted all the secret disarmament with the DNC at least provide a quote, executive order, or something to support your claim, or else I’m just going to assume you are a democrat pretending to be a conservative in order to post threads demonizing the right like a wolf in sheep’s clothing. You aren’t that are you?
I don't hate trump at all he was amazing to watch but it's the machine I'm trying to make people aware off . One guy said trump raped a 13 year old and I called him out for making up stuff..
People keep persisting in the "he raped a 13 year old" myth. So much so, I've created a nice little article which tries to clarify whether or not he did and from what I could tell it was a made up story pushed by a never Trump republican and a Jerry Springer producer, who used a meth addict as a victim.
But thanks for the reasonable reply, and sorry if I've come off strongly, but after 4.5 years of made up bullshit (see other comments in this thread from people who still believe these narratives) I figured I wouldn't have to be subjected to any more mindless TDS horse crap on conspiracy pages anymore. I guess I was wrong on that, but at least you aren't an asshole and thats pretty cool.
Here you go you dishonest faggot:
https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Lawsuit.pdf
Well boys. That's it. u/ScutFarkus just FactChecked me. I guess that's the entire argument down the drain.
Oh wait... isn't that a link to the 3rd lawsuit withdrawn by the defendant?
I'm pretty sure that's the third lawsuit because the first one was thrown out of court because it contained lies and false facts.
And it's definitely not the second withdrawn lawsuit because that was filed by a real estate lawyer, and contained an affidavit from an anonymous source and was laughed at by lawyers and the courts.
So you must be fact checking me using the third lawsuit which was withdrawn by "fame whoring" (quote by Kathy Griffen) lawyer Lisa Bloom. The reason this was withdrawn was because Jonson claimed she feared her safety over online threats... except she was filing the suit anonymously through her lawyer.
Following the court ordered Status Conference, Katie Johnson then submitted photos of herself to the Daily Mail for £50,000.... which is a little weird when one is terrified for their safety that they would drop their rape allegation lawsuit, but still submit portrait photos of yourself to a massive British newspaper.
The Daily Mail commented " 'Katie Johnson's account had been believable and compelling right up until the last minute. 'But new information emerged that suggested she had not been telling the truth.'Ultimately it was discovered that Donald Trump's name had been inserted into this, he was not involved whatsoever. After that she had no credibility.'"
But you don't care about any of this at all. I know this because everything I wrote is in the linked article I wrote and you are too fuckin lazy to spend 15 minutes reading the entire thing. Sorry, not lazy... probably too stupid because you went to a Fact Checking website for evidence and somehow felt like it would be valid evidence on this forum.
So... go fuck yourself and don't waste my time anymore.