I was so upset at first that trump set us up on the 6th Jan to get our guns. But now I'm questioning if it's a good thing, once the forced vaccine start. I don't want to many people around my with guns, once the taxing normal people out of cars, plains and then food, I don't want to many people to have guns then. Did trump do this to help us in the dark winter coming.?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (178)
sorted by:
Dude, seriously, what’s your fascination with Trump? What exactly beyond repeatedly supporting the NRA and warning us Joe was coming for guns did he do? How was Jan 6 a super secret plot to steal guns when no protestors were armed and they were explicitly told not to bring weapons by organizers.
I get it, you hate Trump because you are so outraged someone actually had the balls to call out career politicians for their hypocrisy, and he failed to fix it because organizations like the DNC, GOP with help from the CIA, FBI and media managed to keep the guy tied up in partisan legal accusations for 4 years, and instead of being pissed off that these groups preferred frivolous legal charges over allowing a duly elected president to actually work to the betterment of the USA, you are angry that Trump said stuff that the press didn’t like.
This is a .win site, so who did you expect political support to weigh in favour of? Jill Stein maybe?
Honestly, if you are going to go on and on and on about Trump with daily posts, make supporting statements and provide sources otherwise your arguments come down to sad feelings and personal outrage. It’s tiring.
I would love to argue second amendment and Trump with you all day long but for fucks sake my dude, if you are going to say Trump plotted all the secret disarmament with the DNC at least provide a quote, executive order, or something to support your claim, or else I’m just going to assume you are a democrat pretending to be a conservative in order to post threads demonizing the right like a wolf in sheep’s clothing. You aren’t that are you?
He's a shill, don't bother.
He's a Jew pretending to be Christian, to demoralize the people here. Basically, an archon, and not a witty one either.
Just read through his history. I recommend you do that with most accounts before you dive in with any long replies.
It's a troll. Downvote and move on. It's begging for validation for its nonsense and replies feed it.
He never did this. He only ever supported gun confiscation. Not that the NRA is any better in that regard; they helped write the NFA.
And did what about it? Nothing.
his owners told him not to.
Literally not how the law works.
He seems more angry that Trump did absolutely nothing he promised to do, violated the law dozens of times, and refused to do his fucking job even when explicitly ordered to by the Constitution.
Okay.
Yes, because only Jew Party A would ever hate a member of Jew Party B. There are no other options and you can’t hate both. Ever. Because jews said so. You have to pick a side. Because they said so. They can’t both be held to account.
What right? Call the RNC “right” again; I dare you.
Except this isn't true. Lets look at the trends from our friends in the press shall we?
Trump and the NRA meet at the Whitehouse - CNN Sept. 2019
"I love the NRA, I love the second ammendment" - Newsweek, May 2016
The NRA and the Trump Campaign Appear to Be Flouting Election Laws. Again. - MSN.com Sept. 2020
Trump says he believes NRA will 'get there' on background checks - CNN Aug, 2019
Donald Trump: NRA Puppet - Third Way (Third Way is a national think tank that champions modern center-left ideas.) Aug. 2020
NRA Endorses Donald Trump for President - ABC, May 2016
Trump is at the NRA today. It didn’t used to be a Republican ally. Washington Post, April 2019
So which is it? According to all the "sanctioned" media, Trump and the NRA have been besties since at least 2016.
As I said, in the actual comment you are replying to: " he failed to fix it because organizations like the DNC, GOP with help from the CIA, FBI and media managed to keep the guy tied up in partisan legal accusations for 4 years"
Except this isn't true either. From his own site, here is a list of accomplishments and I'm sure you could fact check all day and please do because I'm too lazy to bother with it. One definite concrete promise made and kept was renegotiating NAFTA, which I think you may have forgotten about. Also the renegotiation with China. But check the list I supplied, because I'm sure there is plenty more examples.
Wow, that quote is pretty damning. I really hope The Hill didn't take the quote out of context like the media has done repeatedly over the guys terms. Oh wait... they did...
Here is the actual quote:
After Vice President Mike Pence referenced gun violence restraining orders, Trump stated, “Or, Mike, take the firearms first, and then go to court. Because that’s another system. Because a lot of times, by the time you go to court, it takes so long to go to court, to get the due process procedures. I like taking the guns early. Like, in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida, he had a lot of firearms — they saw everything. To go to court would have taken a long time. So, you could do exactly what you’re saying, but take the guns first, go through due process second.”
Not touching that comment with a 10' pole thanks.
If you recall, from the comment you replied to, I stated - " he failed to fix it because organizations like the DNC, GOP with help from the CIA, FBI and media managed to keep the guy tied up in partisan legal accusations for 4 years"
psst. the GOP is the traditional term used for the RNC, it means "Grand Old Party".
Sorry, this is my mistake. I should’ve been more clear. You’re conflating “supporting the NRA” with “supporting the Constitution and natural law,” so I ignored your claim and explicitly replied regarding Trump’s (lack of) support for gun ownership itself. I then continued explaining that the NRA helped write the NFA, showing that they have no intention whatsoever of supporting the Constitution and natural law.
I’ve no doubt that he supports the NRA, since they’ve never done anything but acquiesce to gun confiscation.
Yeah, and I replied to that, too.
the DNC, GOP with help from the CIA, FBI and media managed...
THEY. HAVE. NO. LEGAL. AUTHORITY. TO. DO. THIS.
He had every single fucking right under the Constitution to arrest them all, for treason, and KILL THEM. THE DATA IS FUCKING PUBLIC. IT HAS BEEN PUBLIC FOR FIVE FUCKING YEARS. THEY OPENLY ADMITTED TO LYING FROM THE VERY BEGINNING. He did nothing. He didn’t even PRETEND to fight back. Fuck off with your retarded commie narrative. I’m not falling for that shit.
ZERO DEPORTATIONS.
ZERO ARRESTS OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.
Translation: “I don’t care about truth; I’m too lazy and stupid to think for myself, so I’ll go right ahead and keep worshipping the narrative created for me by foreigners who are literally exterminating my people from the face of the Earth.”
The USMCA is literally just NAFTA again. Have you read the damn thing? It contains 70% of the text of the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Why are you listening to what your enemies tell you?
But nothing happened there. The trade deficit just got worse. China did absolutely fucking nothing that the little piece of paper told them to do. And Trump did nothing to punish them.
Yep, literally exactly what I said the quote was. Expands it a little, even, where he gives his PERSONAL PREFERENCE for stealing guns outside the law (“I like taking the guns early.”). What’s the problem, yid? Can’t handle seeing unquestionable truth that destroys your narrative?
Translation: “I have absolutely no argument against what you said and am too weak, pathetic, cowardly, and brainwashed to talk about anything that my masters tell me not to talk about, so you’re wrong because I say so ha ha I win now. IGNORE REALITY. IGNORE REALITY. IGNORE REALITY.”
Thanks, yeah, fuck off. Don’t bother replying again. Both parties are owned by the same people. They all vote identically. One narrative is passed, always, by everyone. There is never any resistance. THERE IS NEVER ANY REPEAL OF THESE LAWS ONCE PASSED. One message. One narrative. One plan. They do exactly what their owners say, every time, on every issue. Learn what controlled opposition is.
When the House or Senate of the United States Congress–a body notorious for its partisanship, real and pretend–passes a bill or resolution 435-0 or 100-0 in favor of the jewish people or Israel… several bills and statements, in fact; a whole slew of them… that looks something suspiciously like “total control.”
You don’t have an argument. No one gets elected in the United States without worshipping jews. They openly brag about it. End of fucking story.
Except I don’t care about things that:
The Republican Party is not “right-wing,” “conservative,” or “traditionalist.” Words have definitions. Objective truth exists. Their voting history shows they are internationalist, interventionist, socialist, universalist, anti-protectionist, and anti-white. You want to run through the goddamn voting history? Or can I save my time and effort since you’re already too damn brainwashed by this false dichotomy to give a shit about what the truth is. I really don’t want to take an hour, pull something together, and have you keep spamming zionist neoconservative civic nationalist talking points.
Psst, I don’t give a shit. Read the RNC platform sometime (fun fact: to be in the Republican Party, you have to abide by the platform). And who runs the committee? Three goddamn guesses.
Of course you don't.
You are a Jew pretending to be Christian.
You lie at every opportunity.
Goal posts shifted - check.
"I love the NRA, I love the second amendment" Newsweek, May 2016 in case you missed it. Or perhaps you missed one of the many many rallies where he repeated this statement. I'm beginning to think facts don't matter to you.. but lets push on and see, shall we?
Do you have any idea what you are actually saying right now? The DNC and GOP are the two largest parties to occupy Congress and Senate(the legislative branch). It is the duty of CONGRESS to make laws, NOT THE DUTY OF THE PRESIDENT TO RULE BY EXECUTIVE ORDER DECREE.
Furthermore, it is the duty of the Department of Justice to enforce the laws created by CONGRESS and these laws are ruled on by the COURTS (the judicial branch).
Your problem lays with the Legislative and Judicial branches bud, nor the Executive branch under Trump. But you know this, which means either you are intentionally trying to straw man Trump into blame or facts don't matter to you... but lets push on, shall we?
See my previous point.
See my previous point.
Glass houses and stones, amiright?
But lets push on...
It's gotta be hard shift these goal posts so much. In your previous comment you said "He seems more angry that Trump did absolutely nothing he promised to do, violated the law dozens of times, and refused to do his fucking job even when explicitly ordered to by the Constitution."
Did he, or did he not, promise to renegotiate NAFTA and trade deals with China? Did he, or did he not actually do this?
You actually linked an article about the trade deficit worsening... during 2020. Seriously? Maybe you might be able to think up another reason, why, in 2020 the trade deficit with China worsened?
Except, context matters doesn't it? (this is why I said the quote was out of context) Trump was commenting on Restraining Orders and not general gun ownership. And here you are on Conspiracies.win actually using The Hill as a source. But facts again... and you...
Wow.
You --> Facts --> not friends.
That much is clear.
So is repeatedly telling someone to kill themselves lawful there, law expert?
Yep. Scream for me, paid shill.
You know how the law works because you are Jewish, correct?
Very Christian of you!
Consent by free will to believe anything offered; creates a conflict of reason (truth versus false), which represents all sides of every conflict; controlled by those who made the offer.
TallestSkil has picked a side. Pretty sure it's the side of Satan, hence the innumerable lies.
Nature doesn't lie; it doesn't offer corrupt information; it offers predefined inspiration to our senses, which when consented to by free will of choice creates comprehended information within ourselves.
Those who choose to ignore adherence to nature; to the source of ALL information (reality), they will instead "believe" the offers of other ONEs within ALL. This is why every belief requires consent by free will of choice to the offer of others. The act of believing (not what one believes) represents ONEs ignorance of ALL reality; which is what makes what ONE believes into fiction.
Belief in the fiction of truth creates the fiction of lies, which creates the conflict of reason (truth vs false) ...a fictitious conflict defined by a ONEs chocie to consent to believe another ONE.
"in nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti"...who is it that speaks "in the name of" (in nomine) the father; the son, and the holy ghost? It is your consent to believe those who make the offer, that afterwards gain the authority to act in the name of everything you choose to believe in. They are the ONEs who define the good side to unquestionable (deities) and the bad side to blamed (Satan).
In the middle of unquestionable authority and boogeymen to blame, sits who? ONEself; the ignorant who shirks responsibility over self onto the false authority, while justifying it by casting blame on the offered boogeyman.
This represents control over ignorance through suggestion.
I can’t tell if you’re on several different types of psychotropics at once or if you’re just a GPT-3 Markov bot that doesn’t have a handle on its content yet.
If I could understand what you’re saying, I’d say that you’re pretty damn close to what I’m saying, though.
Look, it's the fake Christian again!
What restricts comprehension of what nature offers your perception? The beliefs you consent to; which are all offered to you by others. If you believe (anything; doesn't matter what) then you perceive reality through the lens of those beliefs (fiction).
Yes, but you're stuck at the so called jews, which prevents you from questioning what those few, who call themselves jews (among endless other brands) are exploiting to control the many. talmudic reasoning maintains the conflicts of reason (based on believing in truth versus false) aka both sides of every conflict in this world, by suggesting (offering) both sides contradictions to what they're reasoning about.
Reason (truth versus) false represents fiction based on the act of believing. That's not how nature works. Meanwhile the talmud teaches to not use reason, but implication instead (if/then), which is in adherence to motion (nature aka reality).
Implication represents adaptation to motion; belief represents stagnation of comprehension.
Imaging you been dwelling in a swamp. Would you do better than Donald Trump?
I don't hate trump at all he was amazing to watch but it's the machine I'm trying to make people aware off . One guy said trump raped a 13 year old and I called him out for making up stuff..
People keep persisting in the "he raped a 13 year old" myth. So much so, I've created a nice little article which tries to clarify whether or not he did and from what I could tell it was a made up story pushed by a never Trump republican and a Jerry Springer producer, who used a meth addict as a victim.
But thanks for the reasonable reply, and sorry if I've come off strongly, but after 4.5 years of made up bullshit (see other comments in this thread from people who still believe these narratives) I figured I wouldn't have to be subjected to any more mindless TDS horse crap on conspiracy pages anymore. I guess I was wrong on that, but at least you aren't an asshole and thats pretty cool.
Cool. Thanks will have a look at it Saved to read when I have time it's pretty interesting and deep look.
Here you go you dishonest faggot:
https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Lawsuit.pdf
Well boys. That's it. u/ScutFarkus just FactChecked me. I guess that's the entire argument down the drain.
Oh wait... isn't that a link to the 3rd lawsuit withdrawn by the defendant?
I'm pretty sure that's the third lawsuit because the first one was thrown out of court because it contained lies and false facts.
And it's definitely not the second withdrawn lawsuit because that was filed by a real estate lawyer, and contained an affidavit from an anonymous source and was laughed at by lawyers and the courts.
So you must be fact checking me using the third lawsuit which was withdrawn by "fame whoring" (quote by Kathy Griffen) lawyer Lisa Bloom. The reason this was withdrawn was because Jonson claimed she feared her safety over online threats... except she was filing the suit anonymously through her lawyer.
Following the court ordered Status Conference, Katie Johnson then submitted photos of herself to the Daily Mail for £50,000.... which is a little weird when one is terrified for their safety that they would drop their rape allegation lawsuit, but still submit portrait photos of yourself to a massive British newspaper.
The Daily Mail commented " 'Katie Johnson's account had been believable and compelling right up until the last minute. 'But new information emerged that suggested she had not been telling the truth.'Ultimately it was discovered that Donald Trump's name had been inserted into this, he was not involved whatsoever. After that she had no credibility.'"
But you don't care about any of this at all. I know this because everything I wrote is in the linked article I wrote and you are too fuckin lazy to spend 15 minutes reading the entire thing. Sorry, not lazy... probably too stupid because you went to a Fact Checking website for evidence and somehow felt like it would be valid evidence on this forum.
So... go fuck yourself and don't waste my time anymore.
That's funny, because you are honestly a faggot. Your constant projection proves as much!