I was so upset at first that trump set us up on the 6th Jan to get our guns. But now I'm questioning if it's a good thing, once the forced vaccine start. I don't want to many people around my with guns, once the taxing normal people out of cars, plains and then food, I don't want to many people to have guns then. Did trump do this to help us in the dark winter coming.?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (178)
sorted by:
People keep persisting in the "he raped a 13 year old" myth. So much so, I've created a nice little article which tries to clarify whether or not he did and from what I could tell it was a made up story pushed by a never Trump republican and a Jerry Springer producer, who used a meth addict as a victim.
But thanks for the reasonable reply, and sorry if I've come off strongly, but after 4.5 years of made up bullshit (see other comments in this thread from people who still believe these narratives) I figured I wouldn't have to be subjected to any more mindless TDS horse crap on conspiracy pages anymore. I guess I was wrong on that, but at least you aren't an asshole and thats pretty cool.
Cool. Thanks will have a look at it Saved to read when I have time it's pretty interesting and deep look.
Here you go you dishonest faggot:
https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Lawsuit.pdf
Well boys. That's it. u/ScutFarkus just FactChecked me. I guess that's the entire argument down the drain.
Oh wait... isn't that a link to the 3rd lawsuit withdrawn by the defendant?
I'm pretty sure that's the third lawsuit because the first one was thrown out of court because it contained lies and false facts.
And it's definitely not the second withdrawn lawsuit because that was filed by a real estate lawyer, and contained an affidavit from an anonymous source and was laughed at by lawyers and the courts.
So you must be fact checking me using the third lawsuit which was withdrawn by "fame whoring" (quote by Kathy Griffen) lawyer Lisa Bloom. The reason this was withdrawn was because Jonson claimed she feared her safety over online threats... except she was filing the suit anonymously through her lawyer.
Following the court ordered Status Conference, Katie Johnson then submitted photos of herself to the Daily Mail for £50,000.... which is a little weird when one is terrified for their safety that they would drop their rape allegation lawsuit, but still submit portrait photos of yourself to a massive British newspaper.
The Daily Mail commented " 'Katie Johnson's account had been believable and compelling right up until the last minute. 'But new information emerged that suggested she had not been telling the truth.'Ultimately it was discovered that Donald Trump's name had been inserted into this, he was not involved whatsoever. After that she had no credibility.'"
But you don't care about any of this at all. I know this because everything I wrote is in the linked article I wrote and you are too fuckin lazy to spend 15 minutes reading the entire thing. Sorry, not lazy... probably too stupid because you went to a Fact Checking website for evidence and somehow felt like it would be valid evidence on this forum.
So... go fuck yourself and don't waste my time anymore.
I knew you’d be triggered by evidence but there was no way for me to predict that you’d be triggered THAT hard!
That was fantastic. You overachiever, you.
Per your comment history:
I think the last line speaks for itself with this agent provocateur.
You knew your trolling script was intended to trigger reactions? Is that a preprogrammed attempt to escalate more troll reactions or are the bots becoming self aware?
That's funny, because you are honestly a faggot. Your constant projection proves as much!