200 Proofs the earth is not a spinning ball. Free Ebook PDF
(docs.google.com)
Comments (43)
sorted by:
You should look into how aeronautical gyroscopes work. They do not care about whether you spin them, tilt them, rotate them etc. They create their own centrifugal force before the airplane leaves the runway so that they stay true to their orientation no matter what. Also, to say an airplane would not need to adjust it's flight angle is also ludicrous. The angle of the wings does not conform to the globe ?
"It will be fixed as if by a spoke". Lmao no dude. The engine pushes air molecules over the wings, which is what creates the lift. Gravity has nothing to do with this, a plane can cruise at 13,000 feet, 30,000 feet, 40,000 feet. The angle of the wings will determine which direction the plane will fly, and if the engine does not provide enough force of air over the wings then the plane will stall.
Did you miss the part about how a gyroscope works?
Gyroscopes don't care about gravity https://www.bitchute.com/video/achO9bfvIHqG/
Holy shit you're stupid.
You ASSUME I've never been to a beach, been on an airplane, or been on a mountain. All three are false. I live 20 minutes from the sea so I can go there and look anytime and it's flat. No you cannot see the curve. Sometimes you will see convex or concave refraction depending on your viewing angle and water vapor in the air (sometimes upwards curve, sometimes downward... Take a magnifying glass and look through it different angles to understand this).
National Propaganda Radio. Nice. Pendulum in the sand debunked, ships with telescopes disappearing debunked tested myself can see clear across the water 6+ miles six feet above the water can see the beach line which should of been unviewable from 3.8 miles, would need to be at an elevation of at least 25 feet for that experiment. The Earth is flat.
Somehow, I'm not going to worry about what the idiots at NPR say. Being as they're the same people who will tell you (with a straight face) that Richard Levine is a woman.
There are zero flat earth Biden supporters and tons of Qtards that fall for flat earth.
Make of that what you will.
Excuse me,but "Qtards" actually BAN flat earthers on GA.win
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XEy2jh7Z-o
Correct. It isn't trully flat.Differences are hard to spot but are real.
Mostly wrong.,ask somebody who studied geodesy. In fact they are studying hyperbolic geometry too. Of course the difference is small, just 1 degree per 111,2 km so sometimes is easier is to not include this corrections in most cases. less than difference hair for a mile is not so big thing.
Escape speed is much higher than 500 mph.
why satellites and space fall to atmosphere after long time ? Flat-earthers are imbeciles not understanding basic physics. Centripetal force you fools.
Again prove flath-earthers not know physics. Helicopters and hot-air baloons are moving with atmosphere. However those idea of travelling wouldn't be so stupid if you would leave atmosphere and wait indeed.It is currently just not affordable only as achieving escape speed require much more fuel.
Learn the physics and do the math flat-earth imbeciles...
Again physic,physics,physics. Atmospheric refraction.
I don't fucking care to debunk whole those flat-earth idiocy,but it is really funny to point some of it.
It isn't about cold,it is about earth magnetic field and space radiation what would interfere with navigation both in Antarctica and Arctica. https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRFrnWq3OBZM89w_IoiNIQ3lxRENBjvSNRgubfX5_4kWSV3ZNx9eVAV1tObxgnj3HHmAms&usqp=CAU Moreover: nowhere to land if something gets wrong.
Things about planes - they travel mostly over land. Traveling over see is not good - nowhere to land if something will fail.Most flights are done over land because of that. Or on routes where you can turn to land area and land on it.
Also - it is about money and infrastructure. For example: Why Santiago to Sidney not trough new Zealand ? https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/south-american-airline-latam-pulls-back-from-new-zealand-as-it-overflies-auckland/VQELIDMAV6ZDCREJKJRGYNFH2U/
Planes have to be refuelled.
Again no even basic understanding of physics. Both attract themselves,but are also rotating. Centrifugal force opposes here gravity.
But explaining something than somebody don't like to have explained has no sense... However it is good lolcontent and good prove how uneducated and not knowing basic physics are flat-earthers.
You don't seem to understand, the pilot would still have to be pointing the nose slightly down to avoid gaining altitude. A plane is not curved to suit the curvature of the earth. It's funny you try so hard but your arguments are paper thin and based on lies. I could go through every single point you've made and destroy it. I wouldn't be having this argument if it was so easily debunked.
No,you not understand basic physics you ignorant. It is same like with problem of cannon shot:
The thing is: plane moves in and with atmosphere during earth rotation. It is like going in bus or riding in car. You feel force if bus/cars slows or fastens.Only then.
If bus or car would neither fastens or slows you would can feel nothing. because Force = mass * acceleration (second Newton's law of motion)
According to first Newton's law:
So If earth move with constant speed you - being on earth - cannot differ it from earth not moving.
So:
1st: Curvature of earth is too small to be noticeable on those plane even if it would be curved XD - it isn't of course because it don't need it.
Second thing is physics you don't know. Do you even know why satellites not fall on earth ? https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-47b3736d882ae905ca2db1e0f78a888d.webp like on a string
In case of plane there is also difference of pressures over and bellow wings,but without trust it would fall like a stone.
Me say you not knowy english very good.
I bet NASA told you they fall all the time for these reasons. You're being gullible they literally create a math equation to support every lie. Hubble does not exist, it is project sophia which is a boeing 747 modified.
Again, they literally make up math to support their lies. I can create math equations to support the earth is a triangle pyramid and it will make logical sense.
That's just bullshit. They can fly across the Pacific ocean fine but can't fly over a pole lmao. Should research gyroscopes they are 100% mechanical nothing to do electronic, and they function with or without a curve and maintain their level.
Give me a NASA budget and consider it done
I could do it. Give me a NASA budget and also give me a collective of universities at my disposal as think tanks to craft the math formulas as needed and it is completely possible. Also, you do realize there are absolutely no real pictures not Earth from space right? Like, literally there's zero real pictures of earth from space. You must just really like balls bro.
Which mathematical theory from ancient times do you want debunked first?
Oh you are right I am not english native speaker.Sorry.So ?
Try XD If you know math so well like you know physics it would be funny.
Modern plane navigation and other things are more complicated than "hey,you shall have some gyroscope" XD Modern plane have so much electronics that if not meet some storm nor any crisis situation pilots are needed mostly to start and land.
You would literally shit yourself if you would have to understand how to land, understanding completely avionic is maybe even beyond my capabilities man. Modern plane contains huuge boxes of electronics,risking some bit will flip (you probably not know even what I am talking about) might be deadly.
Yeah no they still use mechanical gyroscopes. There is no true electronic gyroscopes they all malfunction during free fall but a mechanical one does not. You should go dig really hard into this because it is the truth.
All cee8hooz points are easily explained away. They're based on NASA assumptions and math systems created to support the globe model. I
Nasa assumptions... When Isaac Newton lived there were no fucking NASA. When Galileo lived,when Copernicus lived - too,there were no fucking NASA. And when Aristotle lived - of course in his times there were no fucking NASA !
All of them lived when there were no only no fucking NASA - there were no USA too - all of them died before American independence war !
Kurwa... It stops to be funny seeing how idiotic your behaviour is.
Not all math systems these people make are false, just the ones that ASSUME or attempt to prove the shape of the earth are..
The Earth is not a globe. There's plenty of real evidence to support this. Mintaka of Orion STAYS FIXED to the equator 90° no matter the day or time or month.. would love to hear your explanation on this lmao..