For example, the infinite set of all integers (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,...etc) is smaller than the infinite set of all real numbers (1.02, 5.00000005656737, 10,6743674673546, etc.) even though both sets are infinitely large.
Infinity isn't really a number so much as a concept. Conceptually, it doesn't really make any natural sense to subtract from it. You can therefore arbitrarily define the result to be whatever is most convenient for your purpose. You could say it's 0, or NaN, or a hippopotamus.
1.Infinity is not a number but philosophical concept. Zero is not a number too in fact, but mathematicans would argue about that zero...
It is impossible to calculate that as we not know nature of those infinities. It can be everything,as those infinities can differ from themselves any way...
I think you might get "zero" if you would be able to prove those infinities have completely identical nature,otherwise you will get some number or +/- infinity.
minus (motion causing loss and self segregation of potentiality)
Infinite (ONE potential (magnetic momentum) within ALL potentiality (electric motion) representing self sustenance of energy...the source of ALL information.
MATH, noun- "a mowing; as in aftermath".
See, consequences of actions within motion; not calculation, for there can be only ONE...ONEself aka ALL is ONE in energy.
Math aka calculation represents the inversion of ALL predefined reality. It tricks the ONE (through suggestion by another ONE) to "add, subtract, multiply or divide" ONEself, which then creates plurals of the singular that deceive ONE to ignore ONEself within ALL.
Ever hear of the Void or the Abyss? It's like the anti-bonding orbitals of reality.
infinity minus infinity is still infinity.
Also, there are different sizes of infinity.
For example, the infinite set of all integers (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,...etc) is smaller than the infinite set of all real numbers (1.02, 5.00000005656737, 10,6743674673546, etc.) even though both sets are infinitely large.
That, what you are saying is very true. Now a riddle. How many wrong numbers of Pi are possible ( i.e. 4.141...)? It should be easy for you.
A riddle for you...can Pi encode our entire universe?
Your universe is not my universe. There is not a common universe.
As long as you are not plugged to net and sit in the basement maybe.
It is not a joke by the way.
Ah, but there is. If I punched you in real life, you would feel it. Unless you are in a different universe, which you aren't.
Only time will tell (Dylan).
Dylan is a Satanist.
But if you can tell me how the mathematical constraints of your universe differ from mine, I'd love to hear it!
Here the answer: Infinite minus 1.
Infinity isn't really a number so much as a concept. Conceptually, it doesn't really make any natural sense to subtract from it. You can therefore arbitrarily define the result to be whatever is most convenient for your purpose. You could say it's 0, or NaN, or a hippopotamus.
u/RightSideFunding:
1.Infinity is not a number but philosophical concept. Zero is not a number too in fact, but mathematicans would argue about that zero...
I think you might get "zero" if you would be able to prove those infinities have completely identical nature,otherwise you will get some number or +/- infinity.
Infinite (potentiality aka electric energy)
minus (motion causing loss and self segregation of potentiality)
Infinite (ONE potential (magnetic momentum) within ALL potentiality (electric motion) representing self sustenance of energy...the source of ALL information.
See, consequences of actions within motion; not calculation, for there can be only ONE...ONEself aka ALL is ONE in energy.
Math aka calculation represents the inversion of ALL predefined reality. It tricks the ONE (through suggestion by another ONE) to "add, subtract, multiply or divide" ONEself, which then creates plurals of the singular that deceive ONE to ignore ONEself within ALL.