if NIST does not contact Woods and ignores her account, it contravenes the Data Quality Act, which requires NIST to issue information that is objective and unbiased. Failing to contact a witness whose account categorically contradicts the claim made by NIST would demonstrate NIST’s bias and would thus make the agency vulnerable to legal action.
If, on the other hand, NIST contacts Woods to confirm her account, Walter foresees that NIST will have little choice but to retract its claim that “there were no witness reports” of a loud explosion — unless NIST pressures Woods into altering her story.
“This could be the first big step toward forcing NIST to reverse its conclusion altogether,” Walter says.
Yes, that's great. Nowhere in that article, or that video does it tell us what 'NIST' is. Are we to guess? Use words. This isn't hard. I am doing it now.
Yes, that's bad: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Well known in the 9/11 truther community, but it's certainly lazy journalism to not write with newcomers always in mind, such as by providing hyper links and definitions in parentheses upon initital mentions of acronyms. To be honest, the architects and engineers for 9/11 truth may not be all they seem, and their work should be followed with caution. Very likely they are controlled opposition.
Article: https://www.ae911truth.org/news/747-newly-discovered-eyewitness-account-puts-nist-in-a-corner-on-wtc-7-explosions
Yes, that's great. Nowhere in that article, or that video does it tell us what 'NIST' is. Are we to guess? Use words. This isn't hard. I am doing it now.
Yes, that's bad: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Well known in the 9/11 truther community, but it's certainly lazy journalism to not write with newcomers always in mind, such as by providing hyper links and definitions in parentheses upon initital mentions of acronyms. To be honest, the architects and engineers for 9/11 truth may not be all they seem, and their work should be followed with caution. Very likely they are controlled opposition.
Thank you.