Yes, that's great. Nowhere in that article, or that video does it tell us what 'NIST' is. Are we to guess? Use words. This isn't hard. I am doing it now.
Yes, that's bad: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Well known in the 9/11 truther community, but it's certainly lazy journalism to not write with newcomers always in mind, such as by providing hyper links and definitions in parentheses upon initital mentions of acronyms. To be honest, the architects and engineers for 9/11 truth may not be all they seem, and their work should be followed with caution. Very likely they are controlled opposition.
Yes, that's great. Nowhere in that article, or that video does it tell us what 'NIST' is. Are we to guess? Use words. This isn't hard. I am doing it now.
Yes, that's bad: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Well known in the 9/11 truther community, but it's certainly lazy journalism to not write with newcomers always in mind, such as by providing hyper links and definitions in parentheses upon initital mentions of acronyms. To be honest, the architects and engineers for 9/11 truth may not be all they seem, and their work should be followed with caution. Very likely they are controlled opposition.
Thank you.