KungFuTzu was a man born in China sometime around 500bc. Soon after, a system of justice and mercy was being developed by a wise man, Mo Tzu.
This system of justice and mercy had many of the hallmarks of not just Christianity, but science too, with the first known description of the first law of motion coming from Mo Tzu nearly two thousand years before Newton would pen The Principia:
Mozi tried to replace what he considered to be the long-entrenched Chinese over-attachment to family and clan structures with the concept of "universal love" (jiān'ài, 兼愛). In this, he argued directly against Confucians who believed that it was natural and correct for people to care about different people in different degrees. Mozi, by contrast, believed people in principle should care for all people equally. Mohism stressed that rather than adopting different attitudes towards different people, love should be unconditional and offered to everyone without regard to reciprocation, not just to friends, family and other Confucian relations.
'The cessation of motion is due to the opposing force... If there is no opposing force... the motion will never stop. This is as true as that an ox is not a horse.'
He is the first to describe the physical principle behind camera, also known as camera obscura.
As Rome canonized their govern-mentus (mind control) of the masses through the council of Rome, so too did the ancient Chinese dynasties select the far more manageable kungfutzu-nism as their state religion, and attempt to wipe out the heresy of universal love. For more insight into what remains of Mo Tzu’s golden legacy, refer to this post:
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/12hRCKFvut/lao-tzu--laozi-is-an-honorific-o/c/
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/12hRCKFvut/x/c/4Dx42GFfYEW
To boil it down, this seems to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the persistence of motion brought about by free will of choice beyond the vessel. Both in terms of inexplicable action at a distance and the remnant of spirit after life. Hope you don’t mind a copy paste, depending on what it elicits from you I’ll be better able to respond with particulars
'In nomine' aka 'in the name of 'aka 'through the lens of' aka on video (I see). How can ONE see when he consents to the false authority of another ONE offering the lens to see through?
The "medium" (middle aka balance) consented to is what creates imbalance within ONEself by doing so. They used the term "medium" as the sleight of hand to show the contradiction. This is all us operating within the allegory of the cave; within fiction; in ignorance of reality.
ONE cannot get information from another ONE; only inspiration to build (transmute) inspiration into information comprehended within ONEself.
As for motion brought about through free will...a) motion establishes momentum, which represents balance, which then requires choice of action, and b) what you perceive as motion represents the consequences of actions set into motion. The motion we physically perceive is within the ONE momentum of the ALL motion we mentally comprehend out of.
Lack of comprehension within ONE, exploited by another ONE, offering the temptation to want that information.
Let me rephrase that...the remnant of self (blood); sustained by adherence to ALL (to breathe aka spirit); through the choice of action by ONE (life).
Already read and watched in before.
Did mimicking anything from that offer created similar results? What I see is spectacle (complexity) used to obfuscate simplicity (alchemy). Helping others through the power of self through the consequences of ONEs actions in adherence to ALL....ALL represents the base; the ONEs the ingredients, and ONEs free will of choice over action what transmutes the outcome (steering the pot).
There is a tangible difference between the world where what Chang does is acknowledged fact and the ones where it is suppressed heresy. If everyone could begin to remember, our journey to unity could begin in earnest
Motion corrupts and destroys creation. Holding onto that which was; ignores sustenance of that which is. Want for what was; instead of need for what is.
Where is his history (bloodline)? Where are the consequences of his actions right now? What did he set into motion?
Set into motion; corrupted by motion; transmuted back to base motion.
And yet here we are in alleged 2021 talking about offered information; allegedly suppressed by the few who control infrastructure of all fictitious communication.
Information cannot be suppressed for those who comprehend that ALL information is freely offered at any given moment through motion.
Motion defines direction for the "journey"; ONEs struggle within to resist the temptation of the direction (towards an end; death) is what creates "unity" with those who choose to do the same.
That which was doesn't fit into that description, because that which was is within those who are.
Still living a small, clan based life in china/indonesia. Within you, me, and everyone inspired to seek by seeing a video of him, which I know for a fact numbers in the thousands, much less the hundreds of thousands who seen the video and thought “...maybe”
Nature, adaptation, and memory, go hand in hand in hand.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fearful-memories-passed-down/
Thank god for that, I feel it’s been quite productive