KungFuTzu was a man born in China sometime around 500bc. Soon after, a system of justice and mercy was being developed by a wise man, Mo Tzu.
This system of justice and mercy had many of the hallmarks of not just Christianity, but science too, with the first known description of the first law of motion coming from Mo Tzu nearly two thousand years before Newton would pen The Principia:
Mozi tried to replace what he considered to be the long-entrenched Chinese over-attachment to family and clan structures with the concept of "universal love" (jiān'ài, 兼愛). In this, he argued directly against Confucians who believed that it was natural and correct for people to care about different people in different degrees. Mozi, by contrast, believed people in principle should care for all people equally. Mohism stressed that rather than adopting different attitudes towards different people, love should be unconditional and offered to everyone without regard to reciprocation, not just to friends, family and other Confucian relations.
'The cessation of motion is due to the opposing force... If there is no opposing force... the motion will never stop. This is as true as that an ox is not a horse.'
He is the first to describe the physical principle behind camera, also known as camera obscura.
As Rome canonized their govern-mentus (mind control) of the masses through the council of Rome, so too did the ancient Chinese dynasties select the far more manageable kungfutzu-nism as their state religion, and attempt to wipe out the heresy of universal love. For more insight into what remains of Mo Tzu’s golden legacy, refer to this post:
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/12hRCKFvut/lao-tzu--laozi-is-an-honorific-o/c/
There is a tangible difference between the world where what Chang does is acknowledged fact and the ones where it is suppressed heresy. If everyone could begin to remember, our journey to unity could begin in earnest
Motion corrupts and destroys creation. Holding onto that which was; ignores sustenance of that which is. Want for what was; instead of need for what is.
Where is his history (bloodline)? Where are the consequences of his actions right now? What did he set into motion?
Set into motion; corrupted by motion; transmuted back to base motion.
And yet here we are in alleged 2021 talking about offered information; allegedly suppressed by the few who control infrastructure of all fictitious communication.
Information cannot be suppressed for those who comprehend that ALL information is freely offered at any given moment through motion.
Motion defines direction for the "journey"; ONEs struggle within to resist the temptation of the direction (towards an end; death) is what creates "unity" with those who choose to do the same.
That which was doesn't fit into that description, because that which was is within those who are.
Still living a small, clan based life in china/indonesia. Within you, me, and everyone inspired to seek by seeing a video of him, which I know for a fact numbers in the thousands, much less the hundreds of thousands who seen the video and thought “...maybe”
Nature, adaptation, and memory, go hand in hand in hand.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fearful-memories-passed-down/
Thank god for that, I feel it’s been quite productive
Adherence to the need to sustain self.
Ignorance towards self sustenance by wanting that which others created. His act of "creating" is what offers inspiration, while holding onto the "created" represents the temptation to want information.
Free will of choice represents the transmutation of inspiration (perception) into information (comprehension) within ONEself. You're magnetic and need to channel the electric flow that sustains you, within yourself, through transmutation of inspiration into information. Growing the seed of ALL comprehension within ONE; expanding magnetic sustenance through channeling electric flow through ONEself; not by claiming information from another ONE.
FACT, noun [Latin factum, from facio, to make or do.] - "reality; truth; as, in fact". That's reality defined by reason (the conflict between truth and false) aka fiction in ignorance of motion. Meanwhile the reality based connotation (to make or do) shows those with eyes to see the contradiction...ALL makes; ONE acts (to do) upon it.
Suggestion of want set into motion creating exponentially increasing want. Meanwhile video refers to see; sensing; perception, and what supplies ALL information to ONEs perception..not another ONEs offered "video".
Yes, but nature (motion) demands adaptation (from ONE), while memory tempts ONE to ignore adaptation to ALL motion by ignoring that which is for that which was. There's a difference between active remembering (ONE choosing self inflicted loss) and passive accumulation of memory through conscious adaptation to motion (ONE choosing to adhere to gain). In other words...memory is a benefit from adherence to self sustenance within the ever changing moment (an ever expanding operating ground for conscious adaptation), while reflection upon that which was, while ignoring to physically adapt to that which is, represents the temptation of remembering.
You would have all the memories within your mind, if you physically adhere to need over want, while the growth of that mental memory creates more responsibility for you to not fall for the growing temptation to fall into the "memory-hole". Adding to this comes our corruption of ego, based on our belief in "words", which now allows us to idolize the so called "past" by applying reason (truth versus false) onto self inflicted loss (past memories), which the parasites obviously also corrupt through endless suggestion (nostalgia; photos of your loved ones; ceremonial remembrance of the fallen; history; video and so on).
The temptation is massive; the responsibility over self even bigger; and our parasites are selling the temptations to cloud (lack of comprehension) our responsibility over self within ignorance by free will of choice).
Consent to false authority over self; leading to the lull of temptation breeding ignorance...meanwhile the majority of mankind consented by free will of choice, to restrict their spirit (to breathe), with a suggested mask (slave muzzle aka compliance to both false authority and self destruction).
How does ONE get from your response to mine? Implication (if/then) instead of reason (truth versus false)...then again; comprehension is based on free will of choice.
Wouldn’t it help get your point across if people physically were aware of mans potential? I.e. that it is literally possible to channel “electricity” (chi) into a magnetic field YOUR free will of choice has generated? You might say something like “they can understand ALL by studying a rock and saying what can I learn from this” but you gotta admit this video speeds the process up exponentially (imo atleast)