Sidney Powell's layers: ""Claims that Dominion was involved in an orchestrated voter fraud effort were so outrageous that “reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact.” Well, well, well... - Conspiracies

Sidney Powell's layers: ""Claims that Dominion was involved in an orchestrated voter fraud effort were so outrageous that “reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact.” Well, well, well... (www.forbes.com)

posted 3 years ago by ZyklonBen 3 years ago by ZyklonBen +3 / -6

11 comments

11 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (11)

sorted by:

▲ -5 ▼

– ZyklonBen [S] -5 points 3 years ago +1 / -6

How will the Qult spin this one?

permalink save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– Questionable 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

From the top comment of r/conspiracy that's how.

It's a motion to dismiss. In a defamation case, Dominion will have to show they've actually been damaged by her comments. If Powell's theories are so outrageous then the lawsuit would be dismissed.

She's arguing that if her theories are so crazy and defamatory then Dominion couldn't have been harmed because they're so crazy that no reasonable person would believe them, and thus, Dominion could not have suffered harm. The article is written quite cleverly.

Dominion either has to accept that her theories are believable enough, as in actually possible, in order for them to be defamed. So which is it, Dominion?

Insane, absurd conspiracy theories that couldn't possibly be true? Or worthy of a defamation suit?

This is how civil lawsuits work.

Please feel free to share your thoughts on this. ??

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

▲ -1 ▼

– ZyklonBen [S] -1 points 3 years ago +1 / -2

Please feel free to share your thoughts on this.

i think that it is hilarious that you take the word of some random people as gospel as if they were qualified lawyers with intimate knowledge of the case.

Whatever confirms your bias, right?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– Questionable 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

"i think that it is hilarious that you take the word of some random people as gospel"

And you unironically wish for me to trust your words on this matter? If so, you've gone about this all wrong.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -2 ▼

– ZyklonBen [S] -2 points 3 years ago +1 / -3

No, you do not need to trust my words at all. This is why I posted the link to the article that contains the statement by the lawyers.

What kind of fucking stupid question is this?

permalink parent save report block reply

... continue reading thread?

▲ 1 ▼

– axolotl_peyotl 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1

u/#mackey

permalink parent save report block reply