Won't even be surprised if it's reverse psychology so we will actually support a CCP esque system (It's a Nationalistic-Technocrat Dictatorship if you wonder -- The exact "reverse" of the Left's "Ideology").
I often think of the way today's liberals behave as being 'culture Nazis'. They want to force everybody to their beliefs, allow no other thought. Totalitarian, plus hypocritical when they label opponents racists then scream 'kill whites'.
One of the old guys from the original 60s Black Panthers was doing an interview with Alex Jones a month ago and he kept referring to them as "Neo-Liberal Fascists" and I think that is the perfect term to describe them and people should start using it.
Left wing people project all their evil onto others, and then demand that everyone else be oppressed by some authority figure because they see all their own evil in everyone else.
Right wing people try and work on their own flaws to become better people themselves and generally resent authorities forcing them to live a certain way.
Ask Musselini. "Fascism is better called Corporatism"
When pitical parties use corporations like Twitter to silence political opponents, that is the literal definition of Fascism accord g to the actual Nazi fascists themselves
A Tifa is just useful idiot domestic terrorism. They would be attacking Twitter and Google if they exemplified their name as much as they exemplify violence
When Obama took up the "Yes We Can" slogan, I instantly thought of Mussolini's heaquarters. If you don't want to click the link, the facade of the building is covered with the word Si (and has a creepy giant Mussolini (?) head).
Every -ism is based on offer (of fiction) towards consent (by free will of choice) under the laws of nature. Every last one of these -isms (all beliefs) are in ignorance to the laws of nature, which is how the few hold control over the many. They manage the ignorance of the many through suggestions.
a) it doesn't matter whatsoever what stands before the -ism; because the contract of belief (offer/consent) represents consent by free will to the offered -ism, after which (((those))) who made the offer, gain control not only over the -ism, but over ones free will of choice. Why? Because after one consent to any belief; one adheres to the belief (defined by others), while ignoring reality.
b) your "belief" in time is defined by the aforementioned ignorance towards reality, because we are not within time (affixed states of past, present and future); we are within constant motion (inception till death). "as old as" refers to you wanting others to define that which was to you, while you ignore that which is, which together represents the few controlling the ignorance of the many.
In short...the many believe in truth vs false (a conflict); the few adhere to if/then (reality based on motion). The former is called reasoning (a corruption of comprehension based on choice of ignorance), and controlled by the latter through talmudic reasoning, which teaches their followers to corrupt reason by offering nonstop contradictions, while being taught to adapt to information based on if/then (motion).
And yes...ignorance is as old as humanity, since we are defined by the free will of choice between ignorance or adherence to self sustenance within motion.
Edit: maybe this will help you comprehend...-isms represents the industrialization of the contract of belief (mind control by consenting to ignorance of reality in favor of fiction upheld mentally as beliefs).
No shit Sherlock
It just uses the Left to do its bidding.
Won't even be surprised if it's reverse psychology so we will actually support a CCP esque system (It's a Nationalistic-Technocrat Dictatorship if you wonder -- The exact "reverse" of the Left's "Ideology").
I often think of the way today's liberals behave as being 'culture Nazis'. They want to force everybody to their beliefs, allow no other thought. Totalitarian, plus hypocritical when they label opponents racists then scream 'kill whites'.
At the same time, they all seem to have PMS.
One of the old guys from the original 60s Black Panthers was doing an interview with Alex Jones a month ago and he kept referring to them as "Neo-Liberal Fascists" and I think that is the perfect term to describe them and people should start using it.
Left wing people project all their evil onto others, and then demand that everyone else be oppressed by some authority figure because they see all their own evil in everyone else.
Right wing people try and work on their own flaws to become better people themselves and generally resent authorities forcing them to live a certain way.
Who invented fascism?
Ask Musselini. "Fascism is better called Corporatism"
When pitical parties use corporations like Twitter to silence political opponents, that is the literal definition of Fascism accord g to the actual Nazi fascists themselves
THE USA is currently fascist
Usa fascist.
Antifa attacking one courthouse.
So they're basically useless as allies right?
A Tifa is just useful idiot domestic terrorism. They would be attacking Twitter and Google if they exemplified their name as much as they exemplify violence
When Obama took up the "Yes We Can" slogan, I instantly thought of Mussolini's heaquarters. If you don't want to click the link, the facade of the building is covered with the word Si (and has a creepy giant Mussolini (?) head).
Every -ism is based on offer (of fiction) towards consent (by free will of choice) under the laws of nature. Every last one of these -isms (all beliefs) are in ignorance to the laws of nature, which is how the few hold control over the many. They manage the ignorance of the many through suggestions.
So, are you saying that fascism is as old as humanity?
When was fascism first recorded as an ideology and by who?
a) it doesn't matter whatsoever what stands before the -ism; because the contract of belief (offer/consent) represents consent by free will to the offered -ism, after which (((those))) who made the offer, gain control not only over the -ism, but over ones free will of choice. Why? Because after one consent to any belief; one adheres to the belief (defined by others), while ignoring reality.
b) your "belief" in time is defined by the aforementioned ignorance towards reality, because we are not within time (affixed states of past, present and future); we are within constant motion (inception till death). "as old as" refers to you wanting others to define that which was to you, while you ignore that which is, which together represents the few controlling the ignorance of the many.
In short...the many believe in truth vs false (a conflict); the few adhere to if/then (reality based on motion). The former is called reasoning (a corruption of comprehension based on choice of ignorance), and controlled by the latter through talmudic reasoning, which teaches their followers to corrupt reason by offering nonstop contradictions, while being taught to adapt to information based on if/then (motion).
And yes...ignorance is as old as humanity, since we are defined by the free will of choice between ignorance or adherence to self sustenance within motion.
Edit: maybe this will help you comprehend...-isms represents the industrialization of the contract of belief (mind control by consenting to ignorance of reality in favor of fiction upheld mentally as beliefs).