Does nature (reality) communicates itself to the ones within through words, or do the ones within all reality brand it with words, while ignoring the ever changing nature of reality?
Does a "bird" comprehend being a "bird" without the word (cause everybody knows that the bird is the word...) and does a bird comprehend reality to the point where it can function within all reality...without the word "bird"?
I question that myself sometimes. Their movement. I also wonder about raccoons. I moved to the pacific NW 8 years ago been wondering why the crows here are so big and my boss tells me the other days those are ravens. Then I think back to that one nursery song rhyme thing.
Reminds me of a scene in a Woody Allen movie where he tells his shrink that dogs and cats were put here on Earth to spy on us. I often think that might be true.
The pigeon bombers with the mechanical pecking. In WW2 they needed bombs which hit stuff. Bombs missed badly especially at sea. So they proposed a pigeon guided bomb. Because pigeons can be trained to deliver messages. Infact with a row of lights a pigeon will always select the lit up light if it offers a reward at 100 percent with simple training. So they put three pigeons into a bomb and they would peck at a lit up screen of the target guiding the bomb on to it through its other engineering. The radio control was short range from a plane being shot at. Enter the pecking pigeon. Similar to the first dog in space. Except dogs were more hazardous. The pigeon was never used in the end. The training takes longer than the demand of dropping bombs. The pigeon is real messy. The shit corrodes the mechanics. Storing the bombs with the birds getting them to location.
But there is a pigeon guided bomb. Because pigeons bomb everything.
Have they made mechanical birds yes it goes back to Archimedes Owl. Are all pigeons robots, no, not the one's in pigeon pies, but they can be turned into bombs.
Does nature (reality) communicates itself to the ones within through words, or do the ones within all reality brand it with words, while ignoring the ever changing nature of reality?
Does a "bird" comprehend being a "bird" without the word (cause everybody knows that the bird is the word...) and does a bird comprehend reality to the point where it can function within all reality...without the word "bird"?
I question that myself sometimes. Their movement. I also wonder about raccoons. I moved to the pacific NW 8 years ago been wondering why the crows here are so big and my boss tells me the other days those are ravens. Then I think back to that one nursery song rhyme thing.
Reminds me of a scene in a Woody Allen movie where he tells his shrink that dogs and cats were put here on Earth to spy on us. I often think that might be true.
na they're just fluffy bouncing balls. The government poisons our water so we are hallucinating and seeing birds instead of the fluffy bouncing balls
The pigeon bombers with the mechanical pecking. In WW2 they needed bombs which hit stuff. Bombs missed badly especially at sea. So they proposed a pigeon guided bomb. Because pigeons can be trained to deliver messages. Infact with a row of lights a pigeon will always select the lit up light if it offers a reward at 100 percent with simple training. So they put three pigeons into a bomb and they would peck at a lit up screen of the target guiding the bomb on to it through its other engineering. The radio control was short range from a plane being shot at. Enter the pecking pigeon. Similar to the first dog in space. Except dogs were more hazardous. The pigeon was never used in the end. The training takes longer than the demand of dropping bombs. The pigeon is real messy. The shit corrodes the mechanics. Storing the bombs with the birds getting them to location.
But there is a pigeon guided bomb. Because pigeons bomb everything.
Have they made mechanical birds yes it goes back to Archimedes Owl. Are all pigeons robots, no, not the one's in pigeon pies, but they can be turned into bombs.