No. I don't agree. When everybody in your nation doesn't wear them. Why are there some people using them to make a statement. In private worship fine. Otherwise integrate. It is written into the Koran, when in Rome. Respect is mutual. There is no respect for somebody dressing like that, they culturally lack respect, on the other shoe obey the national laws. Instead they have imposed on another's nature. It is ridiculous. It is archaic logic. It is not religious scripture. It became converted into religion as an excuse, for both guardianship and marital status, because it lacks trust.
I don't believe in a protest that they should be banned. It defeats the point of a protest.
on the one hand, i see some clear security reasons to ban all masks.
but i figure: that's like banning guns (i.e., only criminals will have them).
i.e., criminals will still wear masks.
conclusions: allow all voluntary face coverings. ban all mandated face coverings (i.e., cults can't force people to wear masks by decree).
it seems so obvious.
No. I don't agree. When everybody in your nation doesn't wear them. Why are there some people using them to make a statement. In private worship fine. Otherwise integrate. It is written into the Koran, when in Rome. Respect is mutual. There is no respect for somebody dressing like that, they culturally lack respect, on the other shoe obey the national laws. Instead they have imposed on another's nature. It is ridiculous. It is archaic logic. It is not religious scripture. It became converted into religion as an excuse, for both guardianship and marital status, because it lacks trust.
I don't believe in a protest that they should be banned. It defeats the point of a protest.