Current PCR Testing Produces 97% False Positives
1) DR FAUCI:
“if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more that the chances of it being replication competent are minuscule…you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle. So I think if somebody comes in there with 37/38 even 36 you gotta say it’s just dead nucleotides period.”
"Most tests set the limit at 40";
"Any test with a cycle threshold above 35 is too sensitive, agreed Juliet Morrison, a virologist at UC, Riverside. “I’m shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive,”
MIT confirms: its own COVID19™ tests are set to 40 amplification cycles.
As if any is needed - I already quote FAUCI, MIT and NYT -- not sure why you would need any more proof, but... here you go...
Makes sense: University of Cambridge recently found 100% false positives - during one full testing cycle - across ~4000 students:
5) COURT CONFIRMATION
As if any is needed - I already quote FAUCI, MIT, NYT & CAMBRIDGE -- not sure why you would need any more proof, but... here you go...
Portuguese courts have recently cited:
"“if someone is testing by PCR ...when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most labs in EU and the US), ...the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”"
6) ANECDOTALLY CONFIRMED BY ELON MUSK:
7) INVENTOR OF PCR:
Still not enough? Here's the inventor of the PCR test:
Also quarantine would not work because hardly anybody would be released
People with a weak flu are testing positive (falsely) for SARSCOV2.
2 weeks of downtime usually clears up a cold.
PCR tests are no different in AU/NZ:
That 400,000 "COVID19™ Deaths" statistic is TOTALLY (97%) bullshit.
In truth, very very very very VERY few people are actually dying of COVID -- IF ANY!
For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 3.8 additional conditions or causes per death.
i.e., COVID19 is THE FLU -- simply breaks the camel's (already overloaded) back.