Well, belief based self restriction of comprehension is a tough nut to crack, because anything contradicting the beliefs of the ignorant will be perceived by them as an attack against their perceived reality.
Notice how easy it is to make others consent to believe anything, but getting one to question his own beliefs is when they fight back to preserve that which allows them to keep shirking responsibility over self?
Your prejudice manifests purely for the same reasons -- to shirk responsibility for yourself by vilifying the other. It's a convenient and two-dimensional ruse just barely obfuscated by the pompous and impenetrable nature of the horseshit you trot out here.
Good vs bad; truth vs false; us vs them; believer vs non-believer...you consenting by free will of choice to believe in one OR the other side creates the opposite. These are dualities representing the offer to gain consent towards division (simple divide and conquer through suggestion).
Within the reality of motion "opposites must coexist, because they're defined by each others coexistence". When your inception was set into motion; the life in between was defined by the pre-defined consequences of inception...death. If you make the choice to step to the left; the balance in between is defined by the right you came from.
As for the so called jews; an idol utilized to hide anti human behavior. It is the direct consequence of the many ignoring self; for the few to exploit that weakness against all others, which within coexistence means they're fucking everything up for themselves as well. Selfish breeds selfishness which represents the corruption of creation through motion, and since selfishness is a temptation based on ONE choice of ignorance; both the few and the many ignore self in the process aka the self restriction of comprehension.
Now let me confuse you some more...I'm on countless platforms talking about these things; spanning multiple languages, and the one thing I'm getting called the most is "jew"; just for pointing out contradictions within beliefs. How does that fit into your us vs them narrative?
I'm glad it helped you because it certainly didn't help anyone else.
Well, belief based self restriction of comprehension is a tough nut to crack, because anything contradicting the beliefs of the ignorant will be perceived by them as an attack against their perceived reality.
Notice how easy it is to make others consent to believe anything, but getting one to question his own beliefs is when they fight back to preserve that which allows them to keep shirking responsibility over self?
Your prejudice manifests purely for the same reasons -- to shirk responsibility for yourself by vilifying the other. It's a convenient and two-dimensional ruse just barely obfuscated by the pompous and impenetrable nature of the horseshit you trot out here.
vilifying the other
Good vs bad; truth vs false; us vs them; believer vs non-believer...you consenting by free will of choice to believe in one OR the other side creates the opposite. These are dualities representing the offer to gain consent towards division (simple divide and conquer through suggestion).
Within the reality of motion "opposites must coexist, because they're defined by each others coexistence". When your inception was set into motion; the life in between was defined by the pre-defined consequences of inception...death. If you make the choice to step to the left; the balance in between is defined by the right you came from.
As for the so called jews; an idol utilized to hide anti human behavior. It is the direct consequence of the many ignoring self; for the few to exploit that weakness against all others, which within coexistence means they're fucking everything up for themselves as well. Selfish breeds selfishness which represents the corruption of creation through motion, and since selfishness is a temptation based on ONE choice of ignorance; both the few and the many ignore self in the process aka the self restriction of comprehension.
Now let me confuse you some more...I'm on countless platforms talking about these things; spanning multiple languages, and the one thing I'm getting called the most is "jew"; just for pointing out contradictions within beliefs. How does that fit into your us vs them narrative?
You're giving yourself far too much credit, you don't confuse me at all.