Because something cannot come from nothing. So, who created God and who created the entity that created God, and who created the entity that created the entity that created God? See how this works?
I should note, I do believe in Intelligent Creation. I'm just not one to say: "There is only God", because that implies a single Creator, and most likely of Abrahamic religious origin. Which, I do not believe in.
So, who created God and who created the entity that created God, and who created the entity that created the entity that created God? See how this works?
What is needed to create? Information to create out of. Energy is that, and what creates energy? Motion. What creates motion? Energy. Energy represents the self sustenance of ALL information, and you are ONE potential within it.
I do believe in Intelligent Creation
INTEL'LIGENT, adjective [Latin intelligens.] - "Endowed with the faculty of understanding or reason". Comprehension (understanding) represents ONEs choice based processing of ALL perceived (input) information.
Does ONE need to believe to perceive information? No, ONE needs to adhere and adapt to it constantly,but ONE can also choose to ignore this, and since nature abhors a vacuum, ONEs ignorance of reality will be substituted for ONEs selfish belief in fiction, which represents assumed information in ignorance of motion.
Question the act of believing within a reality based on motion to comprehend the contradiction of that. ALL form within motion is based on the same function "self sustenance" within motion, and motion also defines the laws of nature for all within motion; the fundamental rules representing the only thing within a system based on constant change that cannot change...the rules that define how motion operates.
Within motion ONE can only perceive "physical" consequences of actions set into motion, yet ONE can "mentally" fully comprehend what defines the barriers of creation within motion. Your inception and your death were set into motion, but you can only physically perceive your life in between, yet are fully capable to comprehend both your inception and your death, because you are alive; because you are within motion.
Physical and mental need to be in balance with each other. ONE needs to mentally choose to adhere to the physical perceived reality to gain mental comprehension of what the physical perception means. That's how ONEs potential increases through comprehension to the potentiality offered by ALL information (energy in motion).
I'm just not one to say...
Correct, because that would be a proclamation of ONE about his assumptions about what ALL means. We cannot define reality, for ALL information is already predefined. It is ONEs comprehension that is lagging behind (unused potential).
Question why nature doesn't use words to brand information, and yet all other lifeforms perceive and comprehend what nature communicates to them. Words represent idols, and us believing them, gives others the power to act in the name of these idols to define our (fictitious) comprehension of reality.
They put a SPELL on us with words. Language represents a corruption of communication. Perceiving information as inspiration to our senses, by consequences of actions set into motion, represents reality based communication...instinctive communication. Our reasoning is about word based definition we believe in; our ego aka inner monologue is a fictitious corruption of communication.
They call it talmudic reasoning not because of what's written in the so called talmud, but because the way it's written represents an ongoing fictitious dialogue. They teach each other to control the human reasoning process by exploiting our ignorance of reality.
I do not believe in
That represents you choosing to oppose those who believe, which puts you in a conflict between believers vs non-believers, which are both defined by the same idol; offered to them by a (((3rd party))) who now controls both sides of the conflict (of every conflict).
They offer fiction...one side believes fiction; the other side opposes fiction; both sides are defined by fiction, while ignoring reality for it. Both believers and non-believers consent to their wants, while ignoring their needs. It is that collective ignorance that our parasites are exploiting.
Pro-life or pro-choice don't matter, because both of them consent to the idol called "abortion", which allows those who offered it, to sacrifice human life for blood. They control both sides, while protecting the idol the sides are fighting about. It's the act of believing that represents ONEs ignorance of ALL reality; not what ONE believes or not believes in; that's just the sales pitch (the offer) to gain consent by ONEs free will of choice.
Who created God?
If God is creator how could he have been created?
Because something cannot come from nothing. So, who created God and who created the entity that created God, and who created the entity that created the entity that created God? See how this works?
I should note, I do believe in Intelligent Creation. I'm just not one to say: "There is only God", because that implies a single Creator, and most likely of Abrahamic religious origin. Which, I do not believe in.
So, who created God and who created the entity that created God, and who created the entity that created the entity that created God? See how this works?
What is needed to create? Information to create out of. Energy is that, and what creates energy? Motion. What creates motion? Energy. Energy represents the self sustenance of ALL information, and you are ONE potential within it.
I do believe in Intelligent Creation
INTEL'LIGENT, adjective [Latin intelligens.] - "Endowed with the faculty of understanding or reason". Comprehension (understanding) represents ONEs choice based processing of ALL perceived (input) information.
Does ONE need to believe to perceive information? No, ONE needs to adhere and adapt to it constantly,but ONE can also choose to ignore this, and since nature abhors a vacuum, ONEs ignorance of reality will be substituted for ONEs selfish belief in fiction, which represents assumed information in ignorance of motion.
Question the act of believing within a reality based on motion to comprehend the contradiction of that. ALL form within motion is based on the same function "self sustenance" within motion, and motion also defines the laws of nature for all within motion; the fundamental rules representing the only thing within a system based on constant change that cannot change...the rules that define how motion operates.
Within motion ONE can only perceive "physical" consequences of actions set into motion, yet ONE can "mentally" fully comprehend what defines the barriers of creation within motion. Your inception and your death were set into motion, but you can only physically perceive your life in between, yet are fully capable to comprehend both your inception and your death, because you are alive; because you are within motion.
Physical and mental need to be in balance with each other. ONE needs to mentally choose to adhere to the physical perceived reality to gain mental comprehension of what the physical perception means. That's how ONEs potential increases through comprehension to the potentiality offered by ALL information (energy in motion).
I'm just not one to say...
Correct, because that would be a proclamation of ONE about his assumptions about what ALL means. We cannot define reality, for ALL information is already predefined. It is ONEs comprehension that is lagging behind (unused potential).
Question why nature doesn't use words to brand information, and yet all other lifeforms perceive and comprehend what nature communicates to them. Words represent idols, and us believing them, gives others the power to act in the name of these idols to define our (fictitious) comprehension of reality.
They put a SPELL on us with words. Language represents a corruption of communication. Perceiving information as inspiration to our senses, by consequences of actions set into motion, represents reality based communication...instinctive communication. Our reasoning is about word based definition we believe in; our ego aka inner monologue is a fictitious corruption of communication.
They call it talmudic reasoning not because of what's written in the so called talmud, but because the way it's written represents an ongoing fictitious dialogue. They teach each other to control the human reasoning process by exploiting our ignorance of reality.
I do not believe in
That represents you choosing to oppose those who believe, which puts you in a conflict between believers vs non-believers, which are both defined by the same idol; offered to them by a (((3rd party))) who now controls both sides of the conflict (of every conflict).
They offer fiction...one side believes fiction; the other side opposes fiction; both sides are defined by fiction, while ignoring reality for it. Both believers and non-believers consent to their wants, while ignoring their needs. It is that collective ignorance that our parasites are exploiting.
Pro-life or pro-choice don't matter, because both of them consent to the idol called "abortion", which allows those who offered it, to sacrifice human life for blood. They control both sides, while protecting the idol the sides are fighting about. It's the act of believing that represents ONEs ignorance of ALL reality; not what ONE believes or not believes in; that's just the sales pitch (the offer) to gain consent by ONEs free will of choice.
How can you be a reasonably intelligent, spiritually-attuned person and still fall for braindead antisemitic tropes?