Because something cannot come from nothing. So, who created God and who created the entity that created God, and who created the entity that created the entity that created God? See how this works?
I should note, I do believe in Intelligent Creation. I'm just not one to say: "There is only God", because that implies a single Creator, and most likely of Abrahamic religious origin. Which, I do not believe in.
So, who created God and who created the entity that created God, and who created the entity that created the entity that created God? See how this works?
What is needed to create? Information to create out of. Energy is that, and what creates energy? Motion. What creates motion? Energy. Energy represents the self sustenance of ALL information, and you are ONE potential within it.
I do believe in Intelligent Creation
INTEL'LIGENT, adjective [Latin intelligens.] - "Endowed with the faculty of understanding or reason". Comprehension (understanding) represents ONEs choice based processing of ALL perceived (input) information.
Does ONE need to believe to perceive information? No, ONE needs to adhere and adapt to it constantly,but ONE can also choose to ignore this, and since nature abhors a vacuum, ONEs ignorance of reality will be substituted for ONEs selfish belief in fiction, which represents assumed information in ignorance of motion.
Question the act of believing within a reality based on motion to comprehend the contradiction of that. ALL form within motion is based on the same function "self sustenance" within motion, and motion also defines the laws of nature for all within motion; the fundamental rules representing the only thing within a system based on constant change that cannot change...the rules that define how motion operates.
Within motion ONE can only perceive "physical" consequences of actions set into motion, yet ONE can "mentally" fully comprehend what defines the barriers of creation within motion. Your inception and your death were set into motion, but you can only physically perceive your life in between, yet are fully capable to comprehend both your inception and your death, because you are alive; because you are within motion.
Physical and mental need to be in balance with each other. ONE needs to mentally choose to adhere to the physical perceived reality to gain mental comprehension of what the physical perception means. That's how ONEs potential increases through comprehension to the potentiality offered by ALL information (energy in motion).
I'm just not one to say...
Correct, because that would be a proclamation of ONE about his assumptions about what ALL means. We cannot define reality, for ALL information is already predefined. It is ONEs comprehension that is lagging behind (unused potential).
Question why nature doesn't use words to brand information, and yet all other lifeforms perceive and comprehend what nature communicates to them. Words represent idols, and us believing them, gives others the power to act in the name of these idols to define our (fictitious) comprehension of reality.
They put a SPELL on us with words. Language represents a corruption of communication. Perceiving information as inspiration to our senses, by consequences of actions set into motion, represents reality based communication...instinctive communication. Our reasoning is about word based definition we believe in; our ego aka inner monologue is a fictitious corruption of communication.
They call it talmudic reasoning not because of what's written in the so called talmud, but because the way it's written represents an ongoing fictitious dialogue. They teach each other to control the human reasoning process by exploiting our ignorance of reality.
I do not believe in
That represents you choosing to oppose those who believe, which puts you in a conflict between believers vs non-believers, which are both defined by the same idol; offered to them by a (((3rd party))) who now controls both sides of the conflict (of every conflict).
They offer fiction...one side believes fiction; the other side opposes fiction; both sides are defined by fiction, while ignoring reality for it. Both believers and non-believers consent to their wants, while ignoring their needs. It is that collective ignorance that our parasites are exploiting.
Pro-life or pro-choice don't matter, because both of them consent to the idol called "abortion", which allows those who offered it, to sacrifice human life for blood. They control both sides, while protecting the idol the sides are fighting about. It's the act of believing that represents ONEs ignorance of ALL reality; not what ONE believes or not believes in; that's just the sales pitch (the offer) to gain consent by ONEs free will of choice.
Intelligent represents comprehension, which is choice based processing of perceived information...perceived by all our senses as inspiration.
Reason (rhetoric) represents language based translation of incoming information, a language consented to by choice to the offer of another, while ignoring reality being the source that offers all information (as inspiration to our senses) to allow us build our comprehension of what all perceived means.
Reason is corruption of comprehension. Our ego (inner monologue) is based on the idolatry of "word" (hence rhetoric) based assumptions about a reality that does not use words (brands; idols) to communicate information, because inspiration is being communicated as the consequences of actions set into motion.
I build comprehension on adaptation to inspiration, and do not consent to reason.
spiritually-attuned
SPIR'IT, noun (Latin spiritus, from spiro) -" to breathe". All life is demanded to adherence to self sustenance by upholding life over death through the spirit contract. Try to use your will to end your life by holding your breath and you will learn that neither your mind; nor your body are in charge of that instinctive bond between ONE and ALL.
For us to exist as form within motion demands us to be within balance (momentum of motion aka resistance to forward motion). So we are collectively "spiritually-attuned" within a state of balance, which is what then allows the ONEs to have free will of choice within ALL.
braindead
That's deliberate contradiction in terms - life/death
antisemitic
Definition of Semite... a) a member of any of a number of peoples of ancient southwestern Asia including the Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs b) a descendant of these peoples c) a member of a modern people SPEAKING a Semitic language.
Definition of Semitism...a) Semitic character or qualities, b) a characteristic feature of a Semitic language occurring in another language c) policy or predisposition favorable to jews.
Definition of anti-Semitism...a) hostility toward or discrimination against jews as a religious, ethnic, or racial group.
So let's look into the historical revisionism of that one...first they gave themselves entry into a host by language alone, secondly they wrote themselves into a favorable position within that host, lastly they use the dying host as a shield to protect themselves against everything else.
That being said...there's no such thing as a jew in nature; it's an idol, based on endless stolen identities that hides anti-human behavioral traits, because all other human life is targeted from within the shield of that idol. That parasitic behavior is btw the consequence of the majority of mankind selfishly claiming ownership over that which nature offer free for all aka ONEs choice to ignore adherence to self sustenance within ALL.
The few exists because of the ignorance of the many. Control over the many is defined by ignorance of each over self being ONE limited potential within ALL unlimited potentiality.
trope
TROPE, noun [Latin tropus; Gr. to turn.]. Motion defines direction for all within it to be from beginning towards end. That's the reality that all rhetoric is used to create allegories out of aka the alchemical ritual of transmutation.
Perhaps, though I am still stuck on the notion of energies or vibration frequencies that I do not understand, that exist in a state that cannot be created or destroyed and I imagine that to be intelligent design.
I highly suggest checking out Alan Watts. I live my life by the premise that I am a creator for the Creator(s) created me. Knowing is not the purpose (IMO), what we create in this experience is the purpose ;)
Because something cannot come from nothing. So, who created God and who created the entity that created God, and who created the entity that created the entity that created God? See how this works?
I should note, I do believe in Intelligent Creation. I'm just not one to say: "There is only God", because that implies a single Creator, and most likely of Abrahamic religious origin. Which, I do not believe in.
scenario: history is reset & we forget it all.
I've wondered about this reset theory all my life. I also wonder if it ties into deja vu.
So, who created God and who created the entity that created God, and who created the entity that created the entity that created God? See how this works?
What is needed to create? Information to create out of. Energy is that, and what creates energy? Motion. What creates motion? Energy. Energy represents the self sustenance of ALL information, and you are ONE potential within it.
I do believe in Intelligent Creation
INTEL'LIGENT, adjective [Latin intelligens.] - "Endowed with the faculty of understanding or reason". Comprehension (understanding) represents ONEs choice based processing of ALL perceived (input) information.
Does ONE need to believe to perceive information? No, ONE needs to adhere and adapt to it constantly,but ONE can also choose to ignore this, and since nature abhors a vacuum, ONEs ignorance of reality will be substituted for ONEs selfish belief in fiction, which represents assumed information in ignorance of motion.
Question the act of believing within a reality based on motion to comprehend the contradiction of that. ALL form within motion is based on the same function "self sustenance" within motion, and motion also defines the laws of nature for all within motion; the fundamental rules representing the only thing within a system based on constant change that cannot change...the rules that define how motion operates.
Within motion ONE can only perceive "physical" consequences of actions set into motion, yet ONE can "mentally" fully comprehend what defines the barriers of creation within motion. Your inception and your death were set into motion, but you can only physically perceive your life in between, yet are fully capable to comprehend both your inception and your death, because you are alive; because you are within motion.
Physical and mental need to be in balance with each other. ONE needs to mentally choose to adhere to the physical perceived reality to gain mental comprehension of what the physical perception means. That's how ONEs potential increases through comprehension to the potentiality offered by ALL information (energy in motion).
I'm just not one to say...
Correct, because that would be a proclamation of ONE about his assumptions about what ALL means. We cannot define reality, for ALL information is already predefined. It is ONEs comprehension that is lagging behind (unused potential).
Question why nature doesn't use words to brand information, and yet all other lifeforms perceive and comprehend what nature communicates to them. Words represent idols, and us believing them, gives others the power to act in the name of these idols to define our (fictitious) comprehension of reality.
They put a SPELL on us with words. Language represents a corruption of communication. Perceiving information as inspiration to our senses, by consequences of actions set into motion, represents reality based communication...instinctive communication. Our reasoning is about word based definition we believe in; our ego aka inner monologue is a fictitious corruption of communication.
They call it talmudic reasoning not because of what's written in the so called talmud, but because the way it's written represents an ongoing fictitious dialogue. They teach each other to control the human reasoning process by exploiting our ignorance of reality.
I do not believe in
That represents you choosing to oppose those who believe, which puts you in a conflict between believers vs non-believers, which are both defined by the same idol; offered to them by a (((3rd party))) who now controls both sides of the conflict (of every conflict).
They offer fiction...one side believes fiction; the other side opposes fiction; both sides are defined by fiction, while ignoring reality for it. Both believers and non-believers consent to their wants, while ignoring their needs. It is that collective ignorance that our parasites are exploiting.
Pro-life or pro-choice don't matter, because both of them consent to the idol called "abortion", which allows those who offered it, to sacrifice human life for blood. They control both sides, while protecting the idol the sides are fighting about. It's the act of believing that represents ONEs ignorance of ALL reality; not what ONE believes or not believes in; that's just the sales pitch (the offer) to gain consent by ONEs free will of choice.
How can you be a reasonably intelligent, spiritually-attuned person and still fall for braindead antisemitic tropes?
reasonably intelligent
Intelligent represents comprehension, which is choice based processing of perceived information...perceived by all our senses as inspiration.
Reason (rhetoric) represents language based translation of incoming information, a language consented to by choice to the offer of another, while ignoring reality being the source that offers all information (as inspiration to our senses) to allow us build our comprehension of what all perceived means.
Reason is corruption of comprehension. Our ego (inner monologue) is based on the idolatry of "word" (hence rhetoric) based assumptions about a reality that does not use words (brands; idols) to communicate information, because inspiration is being communicated as the consequences of actions set into motion.
I build comprehension on adaptation to inspiration, and do not consent to reason.
spiritually-attuned
SPIR'IT, noun (Latin spiritus, from spiro) -" to breathe". All life is demanded to adherence to self sustenance by upholding life over death through the spirit contract. Try to use your will to end your life by holding your breath and you will learn that neither your mind; nor your body are in charge of that instinctive bond between ONE and ALL.
For us to exist as form within motion demands us to be within balance (momentum of motion aka resistance to forward motion). So we are collectively "spiritually-attuned" within a state of balance, which is what then allows the ONEs to have free will of choice within ALL.
braindead
That's deliberate contradiction in terms - life/death
antisemitic
Definition of Semite... a) a member of any of a number of peoples of ancient southwestern Asia including the Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs b) a descendant of these peoples c) a member of a modern people SPEAKING a Semitic language.
Definition of Semitism...a) Semitic character or qualities, b) a characteristic feature of a Semitic language occurring in another language c) policy or predisposition favorable to jews.
Definition of anti-Semitism...a) hostility toward or discrimination against jews as a religious, ethnic, or racial group.
So let's look into the historical revisionism of that one...first they gave themselves entry into a host by language alone, secondly they wrote themselves into a favorable position within that host, lastly they use the dying host as a shield to protect themselves against everything else.
That being said...there's no such thing as a jew in nature; it's an idol, based on endless stolen identities that hides anti-human behavioral traits, because all other human life is targeted from within the shield of that idol. That parasitic behavior is btw the consequence of the majority of mankind selfishly claiming ownership over that which nature offer free for all aka ONEs choice to ignore adherence to self sustenance within ALL.
The few exists because of the ignorance of the many. Control over the many is defined by ignorance of each over self being ONE limited potential within ALL unlimited potentiality.
trope
TROPE, noun [Latin tropus; Gr. to turn.]. Motion defines direction for all within it to be from beginning towards end. That's the reality that all rhetoric is used to create allegories out of aka the alchemical ritual of transmutation.
Your posting gimmick is so pretentious and contains zero insight. Can you define “retard” for me?
Perhaps, though I am still stuck on the notion of energies or vibration frequencies that I do not understand, that exist in a state that cannot be created or destroyed and I imagine that to be intelligent design.
I highly suggest checking out Alan Watts. I live my life by the premise that I am a creator for the Creator(s) created me. Knowing is not the purpose (IMO), what we create in this experience is the purpose ;)
Cool then enjoy hell, faggot
this is why con.win is my home.