I'm trying to find out what more experienced people think about this site. Controlled disinformation campaign or reasonably reliable repository of information?
Comments (12)
sorted by:
I give them 5 out of 5 for info. 0 out of 5 for action.
Have a couple people infiltrated them? YES.
They have been crippled from within.
I'm sure a lot of them are well meaning, but Steven Jones is 100% controlled opposition and glows something fierce. Also Richard Gage is not who he appears to be.
I think their focus on thermite is a red herring for high tech used on 9/11 (see my related thread in the current high octane sticky).
Wtc7 you can see the charges rip through the front of the building in a sequence. 100% controlled demolition. No need for hypothetical exotic weapons.
dude they used both! that's the best way to confuse everyone! of course they had explosives, esp in the base, but they did NOT dustify the main two towers.
Check out the DEW thread in the current "high octane" sticky. The evidence is unequivocal.
Again, that doesn't mean thermite/explosives weren't used! They used em all!
I've read all the evidence and am personally not convinced by it. I put it together with no plane deliberate dis-info designed to discredit the entire movement.
Fair enough, but I just wanted to stress that the DEW hypothesis does NOT mean explosives and thermite weren't used, they almost DEFINITELY were as well.
Yup, member the ole' Great Debate civil war that happened on /r/con about AE911Truth years ago? 99.9% controlled opposition, imo. Nuclear 9/11 and/or DEW is far more closer to the truth of what actually happened on that day.
We have pics of them with busbars. (shaped container for demo explosives).
It was a controlled demolition. The buildings were all wired.
"Take it down"
Nano-thermite cannot turn the buildings to dust. They were used only as plan b declass if the plebs rose up and started asking too many questions. That's were we are at right now. In reality, it's far more likely that the buildings were actually taken down by a subterranean nuclear device (ie. Nuclear Controlled Demolition). Look into Dimitri Khalesov. He had a 3+ hour presentation about his theory backed by evidence and facts.
Nope. Just plain old welded busbar and industrial explosives. I've seen the proof. I saw the results replicated.
Did you know there was a FEMA plan in place to rig all the biggest buildings in case they needed to take them down?
They all fell at freefall speed and photographic evidence shows floors blowing out in sequence.
weird voting ITT. The 9/11 truth brigade is here too.
Yup, noticed that, as well.