I'm trying to find out what more experienced people think about this site. Controlled disinformation campaign or reasonably reliable repository of information?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Yup, member the ole' Great Debate civil war that happened on /r/con about AE911Truth years ago? 99.9% controlled opposition, imo. Nuclear 9/11 and/or DEW is far more closer to the truth of what actually happened on that day.
We have pics of them with busbars. (shaped container for demo explosives).
It was a controlled demolition. The buildings were all wired.
"Take it down"
Nano-thermite cannot turn the buildings to dust. They were used only as plan b declass if the plebs rose up and started asking too many questions. That's were we are at right now. In reality, it's far more likely that the buildings were actually taken down by a subterranean nuclear device (ie. Nuclear Controlled Demolition). Look into Dimitri Khalesov. He had a 3+ hour presentation about his theory backed by evidence and facts.
Nope. Just plain old welded busbar and industrial explosives. I've seen the proof. I saw the results replicated.
Did you know there was a FEMA plan in place to rig all the biggest buildings in case they needed to take them down?
They all fell at freefall speed and photographic evidence shows floors blowing out in sequence.
weird voting ITT. The 9/11 truth brigade is here too.
Yup, noticed that, as well.