Has someone a valid explanation for this?
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (96)
sorted by:
Go ahead. You aren’t here to learn, nor consider you might not understand what you think you do..you’re here to argue. And the hilarious part is that you’re arguing against at least one scientist...it’s mind boggling. There’s been several people tell you what you’ve got wrong, but you’re absolutely certain you’re right.
I’m not part of some conspiracy designed to cover up space being fake...I’m sharing the benefit of my 12 years of university and 29 years of work in the field. What do you do? You know..,since you’re obviously smarter than anyone here ?
Appealing to authority eh? Science is about peer review, reproduceable results, isolating control and variables. If the best you can do is a couple of DIY guys on youtube, I think that says something.
Tell me, what was each experiment's dependent variable? Was there more than one? Should there be?
I watched the video, and they couldn't get it to work until the guy "sealed" the device to maintain atmospheric pressure.. so how much of that little bit of thrust was due to that? Could it sustain the thrust?
It did sustain. There’s 2400 FPS video there...with the scale and everything....and “little bit of thrust”? That scale was in pounds genius...that’s a substantial amount of thrust ??♂️
And yeah, I directed you to something that suits your level of intellect. I mean come on, you’re actually arguing against not only me, but the most basic of the laws of physics.
You asked for an example, I gave you two that even the slowest kid in class cold understand...yet here we are.
You think you’re right? Take it up with Newton.
I’m out ??
You didn't answer my question about dependent variables so I assume you're conceding that point.
And you misunderstood my other question, so I'll rephrase. Would the TECHNIQUE sustain past the point at which the device is no longer insulated with atm? i.e. it can only work once. Boosters on the Lander fired repeatedly so I ask again, do you think this method is sustainable?
It is. There are literally hundreds of examples of other people don’t no the same experiments. Their problem in that video was the type of ignition they were using...NASA doesn’t use hobby rocket hotwires run with a 9v battery.
And I didn’t “concede” anything..,I ignored it because it’s both a straw man and to one stupid to address.
You know what? Believe what you want.,,I sincerely don’t give a fuck. We’ll just laugh and shake our heads I guess. 4% are unsaveable after all.
Physics don’t care about your feelings son. ??♂️
Cya