Has someone a valid explanation for this?
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (96)
sorted by:
You didn't answer my question about dependent variables so I assume you're conceding that point.
And you misunderstood my other question, so I'll rephrase. Would the TECHNIQUE sustain past the point at which the device is no longer insulated with atm? i.e. it can only work once. Boosters on the Lander fired repeatedly so I ask again, do you think this method is sustainable?
It is. There are literally hundreds of examples of other people don’t no the same experiments. Their problem in that video was the type of ignition they were using...NASA doesn’t use hobby rocket hotwires run with a 9v battery.
And I didn’t “concede” anything..,I ignored it because it’s both a straw man and to one stupid to address.
You know what? Believe what you want.,,I sincerely don’t give a fuck. We’ll just laugh and shake our heads I guess. 4% are unsaveable after all.
Physics don’t care about your feelings son. ??♂️
Cya
Your schooling has gone to your head. You can't have a discussion with anyone who thinks outside of your dogma without calling them names, and you don't realize you've been indoctrinated like all of your peers in a politicized industry.
At no point did I ever bring emotion into the argument. However you're constantly telling me how you're feeling and how I should be feeling. So in the most polite way possible, I hope you continue to enjoy the smell of your toilet.
?