Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

28
Has someone a valid explanation for this? (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 4 years ago by penisse 4 years ago by penisse +37 / -9
96 comments download share
96 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (96)
sorted by:
▲ 0 ▼
– p8riot 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

Appealing to authority eh? Science is about peer review, reproduceable results, isolating control and variables. If the best you can do is a couple of DIY guys on youtube, I think that says something.

Tell me, what was each experiment's dependent variable? Was there more than one? Should there be?

I watched the video, and they couldn't get it to work until the guy "sealed" the device to maintain atmospheric pressure.. so how much of that little bit of thrust was due to that? Could it sustain the thrust?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TenDaysDark 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

It did sustain. There’s 2400 FPS video there...with the scale and everything....and “little bit of thrust”? That scale was in pounds genius...that’s a substantial amount of thrust ??‍♂️

And yeah, I directed you to something that suits your level of intellect. I mean come on, you’re actually arguing against not only me, but the most basic of the laws of physics.

You asked for an example, I gave you two that even the slowest kid in class cold understand...yet here we are.

You think you’re right? Take it up with Newton.

I’m out ??

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– p8riot 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

You didn't answer my question about dependent variables so I assume you're conceding that point.

And you misunderstood my other question, so I'll rephrase. Would the TECHNIQUE sustain past the point at which the device is no longer insulated with atm? i.e. it can only work once. Boosters on the Lander fired repeatedly so I ask again, do you think this method is sustainable?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TenDaysDark 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

It is. There are literally hundreds of examples of other people don’t no the same experiments. Their problem in that video was the type of ignition they were using...NASA doesn’t use hobby rocket hotwires run with a 9v battery.

And I didn’t “concede” anything..,I ignored it because it’s both a straw man and to one stupid to address.

You know what? Believe what you want.,,I sincerely don’t give a fuck. We’ll just laugh and shake our heads I guess. 4% are unsaveable after all.

Physics don’t care about your feelings son. ??‍♂️

Cya

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– p8riot 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

Your schooling has gone to your head. You can't have a discussion with anyone who thinks outside of your dogma without calling them names, and you don't realize you've been indoctrinated like all of your peers in a politicized industry.

At no point did I ever bring emotion into the argument. However you're constantly telling me how you're feeling and how I should be feeling. So in the most polite way possible, I hope you continue to enjoy the smell of your toilet.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy