If you think about it, in the 1870s civil war the US government lost.
The US government was PRO slavery. The Constitution was PRO slavery. The Supreme Court was PRO slavery.
The side supporting the government lost. The ones fighting against the government won, and got to write history to make it sound better.
Lincoln was Anti Slavery, but he was elected popularly by third party because the established parties were pro slavery. He did it twice, too, because his first third-party ticket was already against him by the second election.
The government hates outsiders, and the government always loses wars against people. If won't make the same mistake again, it will listen to instead of fighting Americans.
Well, part of it was slavery. But yeah, saying the war was fought over slavery as if that were the only issue is an inaccurate and grossly over simplified view of the war.
A war would break out somewhere else prior to civil war in America. Full stop with the fantasies.
In war obstruction is solved with there is another enemy to fight and insurrection to it is quite treasonous. Especially when your citizens are killed fighting it.
Why would you entertain insurrection it is often because you aren't in war.
Nothing a good war doesn't solve. Only today they're not fighting the enemy they're fighting you. The enemy is too scary and they must have thought they can solve it by making you all sick instead. No wonder there is insurrection.
Did they account for China taking advantage of the chaos and stepping in? Cuz that's what would happen
If you think about it, in the 1870s civil war the US government lost.
The US government was PRO slavery. The Constitution was PRO slavery. The Supreme Court was PRO slavery.
The side supporting the government lost. The ones fighting against the government won, and got to write history to make it sound better.
Lincoln was Anti Slavery, but he was elected popularly by third party because the established parties were pro slavery. He did it twice, too, because his first third-party ticket was already against him by the second election.
The government hates outsiders, and the government always loses wars against people. If won't make the same mistake again, it will listen to instead of fighting Americans.
Lincoln wasn't anti-slavery though he just used that to help support the war. Believe it or not the war had very little to do with slavery.
Well, part of it was slavery. But yeah, saying the war was fought over slavery as if that were the only issue is an inaccurate and grossly over simplified view of the war.
A war would break out somewhere else prior to civil war in America. Full stop with the fantasies.
In war obstruction is solved with there is another enemy to fight and insurrection to it is quite treasonous. Especially when your citizens are killed fighting it.
Why would you entertain insurrection it is often because you aren't in war.
Nothing a good war doesn't solve. Only today they're not fighting the enemy they're fighting you. The enemy is too scary and they must have thought they can solve it by making you all sick instead. No wonder there is insurrection.
I don't think this study is related to our current situation.
Just the "US government"? Loses to who, for what? In what scenario?
Again, against who?