One piece is a worldwide best selling manga and popular anime. The main antagonists of the show are called the world Government. Sound famieler, certain groups may want to establish one here. The world government inthe show has been shown to cover up their atrocities and change history for their benefit. One of their atrocities is destroying the inhabitants of an island because a group of historians and archeologists there may uncover secret history they kept buried. This secret history is known as the void century, and it is essentially a 100 years of history which the world government has buried. It is speculated that this history tells the truth of the world governments founding a d not their propaganda. It is not hard to believe that certain events in our history may have been lied about or altered. Certain events may have been covered up for all we know. We know that the truth of the 2020 election won't be covered in history, and the Trump presidency will be deemed a failure without observing the good he has done. O e of the most interesting things is the rich and powerful of their world can buy and sell slaves at an auction house run by traffickers. That sounds like pizzagate to me. Also, certain families live outside the law in the One Piece world. They are known as the Celestial Dragons and are the descendants of the WGs original founders. They can kill and enslave whoever they want with no consequences. Sounds like some of our elites today. Do you think the author to this series is exposing the real world in his work? One of the characters watching the rich and powerful buy slaves at an auction house said, "this is like a miniature version of the world in here." Who's world, his or ours?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
Have you ever considered a book or anything like that? Maybe in the form of a dialogue? Really appreciate your words there, some great insight to be had for anyone willing to read.
The seeming contradiction in writing a book, I think I observe, is that what you’re conveying is both intimately personal and the most abstract thing conceivable... it’s a universal conversation had with one person, lucky if a few souls more see it, much less to have just the right context to learn from it...
It’s funny, over the last few years I’ve found myself adopting a rhetorical approach to debate, where I would induce a person to ask the obvious question in response to my statement with the “attached” obvious answer. This worked great half the time and annoyed them the other half lol
About language I’m reminded of a quote:
Jesus said: If the flesh came into existence because of the spirit, it is a marvel. But if the spirit (came into existence) because of the body, it is a marvel of marvels. But as for me, I wonder at this, how this great wealth made its home in this poverty.
Have you ever considered a book
Inspiration over information. Submitting information binds me to it; which inhibits inspiration.
or anything like that?
Yes; adaptation to inspiration, which I'm doing right now, and usually I write a lot while doing so, and yet others always "want" more.
Maybe in the form of a dialogue?
I do this as exercise for myself, while representing the consequences thereof in my responses. Distance yourself from the false perception of one and one communication and instead work with the information that inspires you. I cannot tell you anything "new" for I'm merely a vessel for ALL that already is; ONE that is less restricted than many other ONEs, but in the end it's the inspiration ONEself uses to sustain self by comprehending more of ALL.
Really appreciate your words there, some great insight to be had for anyone willing to read.
We all could be like this; it's just selfish ignorance preventing it (and the parasitical consequences thereof).
intimately personal
It isn't tho. Intimacy refers to friendship, with ship representing the vessel within motion, which represents a bond based on adherence to self sustenance. Meanwhile, friend means "one not hostile". The whole friendship deception aims at tricking us to form bonds not based on adherence to self sustenance, but on ignorance; on temptations; on wants, which is why so many friendships "sink".
the most abstract thing conceivable
ONE can perceive ALL that can be. Abstract means "to separate" which represents your chocie to further separate that which motion already segregated for your perception in form of inspiration to your senses.
If you're honest then your beliefs contradicting it is what inspires you to perceive it as abstract. You value based on fiction.
to have just the right context to learn from it
Reality (ALL) represents that which ONE is woven (context) into. To learn (comprehend) requires to choose to not ignore. The choice is free; the consequences thereof cost aplenty.
induce a person to ask the obvious question in response to my statement with the “attached” obvious answer
Prediction about consequences of actions set into motion becomes easy if the other ignores motion, hence a parasite exploiting us all for it.
If the flesh came into existence because of the spirit, it is a marvel. But if the spirit (came into existence) because of the body, it is a marvel of marvels.
Mind and body represent coexistence within ONE, while spirit (spiro; to breath) represents ONEs contract within ALL to uphold life over death aka the demand to adhere to self sustenance within motion.
"patri et filii spiritus sancti" represents just that...father (ALL); son (ONE), holy spirit (contract between ALL and ONE)...it's the "in nomine" (in the name of) that allows another (((one))) to subvert it through an offered contract of belief (faith), which tricks ONE to ignore ALL.
But as for me, I wonder at this, how this great wealth made its home in this poverty.
Poverty (want of convenient means of subsistence) is the consequence of ignoring ones need to sustain self, which in this case represents ONEs responsibility of self in form of the act of evaluation of ALL offered. It's the belief in false value that a) devalues self and b) gives others the power to define value and therewith devalue all others.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4L87pRqRrYE
Hey weird thing, I watched this video maybe like 8 years ago (different upload) and recently rediscovered it. I was hoping it might inspire you to share some of your thoughts on the mechanistic explanations (possible, not proclaimed) that you think could be at play. I saw it with new eyes given what you said about our vessels in motion, thought you might like it/have heard of the theory before