As a woman that owns property, I agree. Actually the argument is a sound one. Property owners actually have a stake in their area, county, state whatever. They have skin in the game, so these policies, good or bad, directly effect the worth of that stake. Which is how it used to work way back when this was still a republic
Landowners only? What's to stop the billionaires from buying all the land in the next 100 years then never letting it get out of their family? Then only the billionaires can vote. Landowners only is AMAZING for the rich and the elite.
But you said with someone else you agree. Do you not see the obviously slippery slope here? You don't think poor people have any stake in the game and shouldn't have a say?
What's to stop rich people from bussing in a bunch of poor immigrants who will vote for them ? You know like what they're literally doing now with our bs voting system.
My point is there is not a system we could dream up that an psychopathic oligarchy won't corrupt.
So ima stick with the founding fathers original idea that you shouldnt vote if you don't have skin in the game. Just on principle alone.
As a human being and a citizen of your country, you LITERALLY have your skin in the game. IT's such a stupid idea in my opinion. As if policy doesn't affect anyone but the well off land owners.
No, it's a completely stupid idea. Something like 95% of the land in the US is owned by old rich white men. I can start to see why you'd want this. Makes me wonder about your morals, then again, you do love you some Trumplestiltskin.
I'm going to have to butt in here with an "well, actually..." because all of Germany didn't embrace weimar. Very much the way liberals control cities and fall all over themselves to prove how "metropolitan" they are by embracing things like "Desmond is amazing".
Contrast that with Joe biden praising the jews for making our children gay with their jew media.
The Nazis FOB after taking berlin was actually a famous gay club. Look at weimars encouraging sex with children and compare that with the talmud.
Women shouldn't vote. The current state of affairs is my argument
Landowners ONLY.
As a woman that owns property, I agree. Actually the argument is a sound one. Property owners actually have a stake in their area, county, state whatever. They have skin in the game, so these policies, good or bad, directly effect the worth of that stake. Which is how it used to work way back when this was still a republic
Am woman landowner. Agree!
Landowners only? What's to stop the billionaires from buying all the land in the next 100 years then never letting it get out of their family? Then only the billionaires can vote. Landowners only is AMAZING for the rich and the elite.
What a dumb idea.
I meant that's not my idea that was the founding fathers original concept. So you can take it up with them.
But you said with someone else you agree. Do you not see the obviously slippery slope here? You don't think poor people have any stake in the game and shouldn't have a say?
Ridiculous.
What's to stop rich people from bussing in a bunch of poor immigrants who will vote for them ? You know like what they're literally doing now with our bs voting system.
My point is there is not a system we could dream up that an psychopathic oligarchy won't corrupt.
So ima stick with the founding fathers original idea that you shouldnt vote if you don't have skin in the game. Just on principle alone.
As a human being and a citizen of your country, you LITERALLY have your skin in the game. IT's such a stupid idea in my opinion. As if policy doesn't affect anyone but the well off land owners.
I never said it was working, but landowners only is truly stupid at this point in time.
No, it's a completely stupid idea. Something like 95% of the land in the US is owned by old rich white men. I can start to see why you'd want this. Makes me wonder about your morals, then again, you do love you some Trumplestiltskin.
(((Edward Bernays))) who came up with the campaign was the nephew of pervert and cocaine addict (((Sigmund Freud))).
freedom
Free + Dominant = contradiction in terms. Hidden in plain sight.
Or how they broke up the family units by convincing us that single mothers are "heros" and abortions are "empowering"?
Just remind them how a whole nation embraced Weimar Germany and the Nazis to save them from death.
That was literally set up to happen. Americans even bankrolled Hitler.... that shit is a while huge conspiracy too.
I'm going to have to butt in here with an "well, actually..." because all of Germany didn't embrace weimar. Very much the way liberals control cities and fall all over themselves to prove how "metropolitan" they are by embracing things like "Desmond is amazing".
Contrast that with Joe biden praising the jews for making our children gay with their jew media.
The Nazis FOB after taking berlin was actually a famous gay club. Look at weimars encouraging sex with children and compare that with the talmud.
Nothing changes.