Specifically addresses the insurrection act with its own article. First line of article, “In the literal sense, the Insurrection Act does not exist.” Lin Wood, being a lawyer, should know this which means he is purposefully lying.
However, I do think it is interesting that it is addressed in October. Shows there is some discussion in the military. The article concludes, “Since our nation’s founding, Congress has seen fit to support the need for emergency powers for the President to confront “insurrection, domestic vio- lence, unlawful combinations, or conspiracies.” The article generally supports the use of military domestically by the president.
I don't know what your game is or what kind of horrible writers they're using for that publication but the Insurrection Act is literally a thing.
The article is making a strange argument that it "doesn't exist" because it's based on a collection of laws and precedent, but that's not unusual for legislation.
You showed a code not the mythical Insurrection Act. The publication is published by Gen Milley. It’s the highest level open source periodical for the joint force. It is written by senior level officials in the DoD.
My point was to show that Trump does have the authority to use the military and it seems to be on the minds of leaders. I especially liked that it called out conspiracies. But people like Lin Wood claiming Trump signed some act that has a specific proper name is lying. No act exists by that name. He is acting like he has all this evidence and insider info but does not.
Latest issue of Joint Chiefs Quarterly Publication
Specifically addresses the insurrection act with its own article. First line of article, “In the literal sense, the Insurrection Act does not exist.” Lin Wood, being a lawyer, should know this which means he is purposefully lying.
However, I do think it is interesting that it is addressed in October. Shows there is some discussion in the military. The article concludes, “Since our nation’s founding, Congress has seen fit to support the need for emergency powers for the President to confront “insurrection, domestic vio- lence, unlawful combinations, or conspiracies.” The article generally supports the use of military domestically by the president.
I don't know what your game is or what kind of horrible writers they're using for that publication but the Insurrection Act is literally a thing.
The article is making a strange argument that it "doesn't exist" because it's based on a collection of laws and precedent, but that's not unusual for legislation.
Here...
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/253
You showed a code not the mythical Insurrection Act. The publication is published by Gen Milley. It’s the highest level open source periodical for the joint force. It is written by senior level officials in the DoD.
My point was to show that Trump does have the authority to use the military and it seems to be on the minds of leaders. I especially liked that it called out conspiracies. But people like Lin Wood claiming Trump signed some act that has a specific proper name is lying. No act exists by that name. He is acting like he has all this evidence and insider info but does not.