This is the same government/deep state/TPTB who fired on a crowd of thousands in Las Vegas to cover up a botched arms deal. Then, proceeded to use their MSM influence to memory hole the entire event within a month.
They are stupidly powerful. If they felt threatened, seriously and legitimately threatened, they would be raising hell right now.
A ruling elite & an oppressed class of people who exist to serve those in power.
as opposed to...? every fucking -ism gets corrupted that way sooner or later. best system is a dynamic system with strange attractors where the different -isms are in stable balance and society can rest in continuous but fairly stable motion. like surfing a standing wave.
As opposed to not murdering everyone in a racist coup while screaming "equality!".
You cannot square such a cowardly ideology. There is no fucking "balance", dumbass. Do you seize only some of the means of production? Does the coup only install half a government full of bolsheviks?
You think you're smart telling everyone to get along like you're some authoritarian school teacher who's going to threaten to keep everyone in detention. It only proves how completely ignorant you are of the most basic principles of the situation we're in.
I would say that Lin Wood is calling for Trump to be a dictator and purge his political opponents like Saddam Hussein (1979 Ba'ath Party Purge), Hitler (Night of the Long Knives), Stalin (The Great Purge), Mao Zedong (Cleansing the Class Ranks), et. al. This is highly undemocratic and extremely frightening.
As if there's anything remotely democratic about the system he would be purging. If you told the Athenians, let alone the founding fathers, that an imperialistic police state which
imprisoned and tortured its own people in military black sites,
spent billions on foreign aid to nations that hate us while letting its own people starve, and
locked up huge portions of its population for decades with no hope of ever living a normal life
was a "democracy", they'd think you were mocking them.
So you are openly in favour of the American president to purge his political opponents?
Also, I would not use the ancient Athen as a good example of a democracy. Not only because only a small subset of the population could vote, but also because of the fact that they had a legal right to purge their political opponents (Ostracism). And the fact that they voted for the execution of Socrates, even though he wasn't guilty of doing any crime.
Nice way to dodge the point. Pearl-clutching and pilpul isn't an argument. Do you contend that there is anything good about the US government murdering dozens of US citizens, as in Waco? Private citizens at will, as in Ruby Ridge? Defying its own laws and constitution, as it has with gun laws? Putting its constituents last, as it has with the spending bill? Sending armed police to imprison its citizens in their own homes without due process, as it has during the lockdowns? Openly and provably committing voter fraud, as it has this past year?
If not, do you contend that there is any way of preventing or solving these problems that is achievable without the consent of those who perpetrated these acts? Because you will never get Mitch McConnell to vote for his having LESS power.
Using a list of unconnected things is not a good argument.
Even if I would admit that there isn't anything good about the US government murdering dozens of US citizens in the early 90s, how would it be solved if Donald Trump suddenly became a dictator? Or to take Trump out of the question, how would the situation be improved if the legislative and judicial branches of government would be purged and the executive branch became the only power in the country?
Also, the other things in your list is just dodging the point. For example, I could argue that Trump himself was guilty of 'putting his constituents last' with his own budget plan, but that is not the point.
The point is that you are supportive of Trump being an actual dictator by purging his political opponents. If you did not support his politics you would not want him to be a dictator, right?
Did I ever say I was a Trump supporter? Did I even say I would support him doing that? I just said that your contention that it's in any way undemocratic is simply false, or at least totally irrelevant. Like another user posted, it was in a sense "undemocratic" for the founding fathers to declare independence from Great Britain and start the American Revolution against the Crown, if you only define "democratic" actions as those you take having some kind of national vote. I do personally believe that direct executive action would be needed to solve the problems of the US government. I don't believe it has to be Trump, and in fact I'd rather it was any of a number of other people, but I'll work with what I have.
You're also operating on wild conjecture and equating it to truth. The executive branch becoming the only power in the land does not proceed from Trump removing those currently in office who are provably corrupt. There's a wild difference between saying "There's a risk A will happen if we do B", and saying "A will happen if we do B". There is some risk, negligible or non-negligible, that unilateral executive actions will lead to dictatorships. This is not a rule. There are plenty of incidences in history where unilateral and extra-legal executive actions do NOT lead to dictatorships, most famously Cincinnatus, but certainly in our own history Lincoln, FDR, and Washington
Again, pilpul and pearl clutching are not arguments. If you contend that there are ways to get rid of the injustice and corruption that has worked its way to the heart of the US government, which are not extralegal and do not rely on unilateral executive action, say them. Just saying "Well I don't know but there have to be ways" is wasting everyone's time. No one, least of all me, is going to waste hours or days brainstorming how to peacefully reform one of the worst and most corrupt governments on the planet just so you can self-aggrandize.
No, you did not say that you were a Trump supporter. But your words say that you support him "doing that". It's like with death penalty or abortion, you either support it or you don't. And you do support it.
Yes, there are some (not plenty) instances where "unilateral and extra-legal executive actions do NOT lead to dictatorships", but these are the exceptions. You list some of the greatest men in our history. Trump is not one of them. He is closer to Stalin or to Sulla.
Also, it's my belief that none of the men you listed did imprison people from the supreme court or the congress. If you imprison people to stay in power, you don't generally let someone else take power.
And let's say that Trump was not the unhinged corrupt person that he is. Let's say that he was as honest as Lincoln. If he would take this kind of action outside of war, it would just mean that someone else would make a coup later, just like Caesar did not long after Sulla. Once the floodgate is opened [...]
Of course they are. They would be in favor of Trump stabbing their mothers in the head and shiting in the wound is he said it was the best course of action.
Please, fill me in. What would be the difference between Trump purging his political opponents and (for example) Stalin purging his political opponents?
You are conflating 2 different things. Putting criminals behind bars lawfully for treason and/or fraud is not a purge. Those dictators were killing people by the millions. Do you really think Trump would have people killed for wrongthink?
Both Stalin and Hitler used the courts to turn their political opponents into convicted criminals. These political opponents (or criminals, as you call them) were being convicted for treason. Therefor, they did in fact put criminals behind bars lawfully for treason. So, are you saying that Hitler and Stalin was not guilty of purging their political opponents? I don't agree with you.
And yes, I think that there is a chance that he would, if he could. He can't do it now, because he doesn't have unlimited power. Like Stalin, Trump is very paranoid and extremely vindictive. For example of how vindictive he is, why did he fire Yevgeny Vindman?
Don't forget that those were kangaroo courts. People were killed or sent to camps. Where are the camps? Re Vindman, you cannot expect to lie and get away with it, there are always consequences. Saying that it's vindictiveness is ridiculous.
Yes, of course those were kangaroo courts. The point stand, if Trump would purge members of the Supreme Court for voting against Trump's wishes (as in John Roberts), do you really expect the courts to be anything but kangaroo courts?
Also, I could argue that Trump lies all the time and gets away with it, but that is not the point. The point is that Trump fired Yevgeny Vindman, and as far as I know his only "crime" was being the brother of Alexander Vindman. That is a clear cut example of vindictiveness.
You disappoint me. No, really. I was not even talking about the Holocaust, so why did you bring up your anti-semitic views? Do you even know what the Night of the long Knives is?
Stalin was a zionist plant. A partially mongoloid jew as to avoid suspicion. They teach children in israel that stalin was as bad as hitler to the jews which is just plain wrong. The fact stalin had a jew as a wife pokes a big hole in this little piece of propaganda.
I said nothing "anti-semitic" because the people you call jews aren't from the "semitic region".
Most people confuse the "night of long knifes" with "krystal night". Two separate events but one sounds cooler. Germany was very very nice to the jews until a young assassin killed an officer. A gay Nazi which the jews exploited their embarrassment, wiemar republic, honeypot child sex operations, yada yada yada.
You know, your blatant anti-semitism doesn’t contribute to the topic at all. If Trump would imprison Pence and the others he would definitely purge most of his political opponents, and even an person like yourself would not support that.
Hey asshole that's against free speech and wants a safe space where his bullshit can't be questioned, how about you, instead, go and get fucked by your fat Orange god?
Bro, that's ok if you stay.. But people should know you're just a clown here.. Take a look on how many downvotes you get on EVERY shit you comment, lol.. It's hillarious :) Enjoy being a persona non grata..
I see that as a desperate act.. Are you being (well) paid to fuck our liberties and future? Nothing can stop mankind to thrive. You did try before but now we're getting help. And that's how you will fail. Wonder if you're MK'd Ultra and act without any compassion, or a mercenary.. or you're just a tard.. "Soros engine" will eventually be hunted. Time is coming as elites desperate acts prove that.
Compassion! Here! Fucking HILLARYous. I was nice to everyone for two weeks and just saying my beliefs and was accosted, told to fucking kill myself, called for a hundred times, someone asked where I lived so he could come stab me, calls for me to be censored and banned.
Compassion.Hah! I have more fucking compassion in one finger than the entirety of the right wing of America.
Well, so call the authorities to call out that guy who threatened you.. Where's the proof to that? And more: Can you touch the other matters I mentioned in my comment, please?
Or that it implies that they’ve already won, so these tweets are just priming the public.
I hate to agree, but I think you are right.
This is the same government/deep state/TPTB who fired on a crowd of thousands in Las Vegas to cover up a botched arms deal. Then, proceeded to use their MSM influence to memory hole the entire event within a month.
They are stupidly powerful. If they felt threatened, seriously and legitimately threatened, they would be raising hell right now.
like staging a pandemic and trying to steal a presidency?
Dumb.... Duh dumb dumb duuuuuuuuumb!
I just went down the las vegas rabbit hole a few days ago. Definitely a hoax.
Same lame M.O. closing act of a three day festival.
A mathematically improbable number of the “survivors” just happened to congregate in California where another (fake) shooting happened
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Las_Vegas_shooting
You mean how TPTB accelerated their efforts with Iran tensions, race riots, the pandemic, global recession, and election rigging?
Yes Trump escalated things by pulling out of the Iran deal and assassinating their to general. TPTB love him. So divisive.
It’s the total opposite my dude
This video will help explain the communism and slavery part.
https://youtu.be/C1-0XKYAZII
Pence just broke with Trump.. wondering how Jan 4th-6th will be..
How so?
as opposed to...? every fucking -ism gets corrupted that way sooner or later. best system is a dynamic system with strange attractors where the different -isms are in stable balance and society can rest in continuous but fairly stable motion. like surfing a standing wave.
As opposed to not murdering everyone in a racist coup while screaming "equality!".
You cannot square such a cowardly ideology. There is no fucking "balance", dumbass. Do you seize only some of the means of production? Does the coup only install half a government full of bolsheviks?
You think you're smart telling everyone to get along like you're some authoritarian school teacher who's going to threaten to keep everyone in detention. It only proves how completely ignorant you are of the most basic principles of the situation we're in.
When the military inevitably does nothing come inauguration day, Lin Wood will call for its dismantling. Deep state generals and all that jazz.
He's bonkers; off the wall insane.
This guy believes he's the second coming of Christ (allegedly). We all know how well claiming to be the son of God works out for folks.
I would say that Lin Wood is calling for Trump to be a dictator and purge his political opponents like Saddam Hussein (1979 Ba'ath Party Purge), Hitler (Night of the Long Knives), Stalin (The Great Purge), Mao Zedong (Cleansing the Class Ranks), et. al. This is highly undemocratic and extremely frightening.
As if there's anything remotely democratic about the system he would be purging. If you told the Athenians, let alone the founding fathers, that an imperialistic police state which
was a "democracy", they'd think you were mocking them.
I see this as well. The founding fathers removed their oppressors in a very undemocratic way.
So you are openly in favour of the American president to purge his political opponents?
Also, I would not use the ancient Athen as a good example of a democracy. Not only because only a small subset of the population could vote, but also because of the fact that they had a legal right to purge their political opponents (Ostracism). And the fact that they voted for the execution of Socrates, even though he wasn't guilty of doing any crime.
Nice way to dodge the point. Pearl-clutching and pilpul isn't an argument. Do you contend that there is anything good about the US government murdering dozens of US citizens, as in Waco? Private citizens at will, as in Ruby Ridge? Defying its own laws and constitution, as it has with gun laws? Putting its constituents last, as it has with the spending bill? Sending armed police to imprison its citizens in their own homes without due process, as it has during the lockdowns? Openly and provably committing voter fraud, as it has this past year?
If not, do you contend that there is any way of preventing or solving these problems that is achievable without the consent of those who perpetrated these acts? Because you will never get Mitch McConnell to vote for his having LESS power.
Using a list of unconnected things is not a good argument.
Even if I would admit that there isn't anything good about the US government murdering dozens of US citizens in the early 90s, how would it be solved if Donald Trump suddenly became a dictator? Or to take Trump out of the question, how would the situation be improved if the legislative and judicial branches of government would be purged and the executive branch became the only power in the country?
Also, the other things in your list is just dodging the point. For example, I could argue that Trump himself was guilty of 'putting his constituents last' with his own budget plan, but that is not the point.
The point is that you are supportive of Trump being an actual dictator by purging his political opponents. If you did not support his politics you would not want him to be a dictator, right?
Did I ever say I was a Trump supporter? Did I even say I would support him doing that? I just said that your contention that it's in any way undemocratic is simply false, or at least totally irrelevant. Like another user posted, it was in a sense "undemocratic" for the founding fathers to declare independence from Great Britain and start the American Revolution against the Crown, if you only define "democratic" actions as those you take having some kind of national vote. I do personally believe that direct executive action would be needed to solve the problems of the US government. I don't believe it has to be Trump, and in fact I'd rather it was any of a number of other people, but I'll work with what I have.
You're also operating on wild conjecture and equating it to truth. The executive branch becoming the only power in the land does not proceed from Trump removing those currently in office who are provably corrupt. There's a wild difference between saying "There's a risk A will happen if we do B", and saying "A will happen if we do B". There is some risk, negligible or non-negligible, that unilateral executive actions will lead to dictatorships. This is not a rule. There are plenty of incidences in history where unilateral and extra-legal executive actions do NOT lead to dictatorships, most famously Cincinnatus, but certainly in our own history Lincoln, FDR, and Washington
Again, pilpul and pearl clutching are not arguments. If you contend that there are ways to get rid of the injustice and corruption that has worked its way to the heart of the US government, which are not extralegal and do not rely on unilateral executive action, say them. Just saying "Well I don't know but there have to be ways" is wasting everyone's time. No one, least of all me, is going to waste hours or days brainstorming how to peacefully reform one of the worst and most corrupt governments on the planet just so you can self-aggrandize.
No, you did not say that you were a Trump supporter. But your words say that you support him "doing that". It's like with death penalty or abortion, you either support it or you don't. And you do support it.
Yes, there are some (not plenty) instances where "unilateral and extra-legal executive actions do NOT lead to dictatorships", but these are the exceptions. You list some of the greatest men in our history. Trump is not one of them. He is closer to Stalin or to Sulla.
Also, it's my belief that none of the men you listed did imprison people from the supreme court or the congress. If you imprison people to stay in power, you don't generally let someone else take power.
And let's say that Trump was not the unhinged corrupt person that he is. Let's say that he was as honest as Lincoln. If he would take this kind of action outside of war, it would just mean that someone else would make a coup later, just like Caesar did not long after Sulla. Once the floodgate is opened [...]
Of course they are. They would be in favor of Trump stabbing their mothers in the head and shiting in the wound is he said it was the best course of action.
Imagine being such a coward that even when all you have to do to insult me is move your mouse two inches you STILL choose to preach to your choir.
Hahaha you dumb fucking cunt I'm on my phone. You don't need a mouse to use a phove. - posted from LG GX8 ThinQ
Omg Q nooooooooooooo!
I notice you don't deny being a coward.
Wow you sure got me there tardmuffin!
I notice you didn't deny bring a dumb cunt.
Bad analogy, you clearly don't know history.
Please, fill me in. What would be the difference between Trump purging his political opponents and (for example) Stalin purging his political opponents?
You are conflating 2 different things. Putting criminals behind bars lawfully for treason and/or fraud is not a purge. Those dictators were killing people by the millions. Do you really think Trump would have people killed for wrongthink?
Both Stalin and Hitler used the courts to turn their political opponents into convicted criminals. These political opponents (or criminals, as you call them) were being convicted for treason. Therefor, they did in fact put criminals behind bars lawfully for treason. So, are you saying that Hitler and Stalin was not guilty of purging their political opponents? I don't agree with you.
And yes, I think that there is a chance that he would, if he could. He can't do it now, because he doesn't have unlimited power. Like Stalin, Trump is very paranoid and extremely vindictive. For example of how vindictive he is, why did he fire Yevgeny Vindman?
Don't forget that those were kangaroo courts. People were killed or sent to camps. Where are the camps? Re Vindman, you cannot expect to lie and get away with it, there are always consequences. Saying that it's vindictiveness is ridiculous.
Yes, of course those were kangaroo courts. The point stand, if Trump would purge members of the Supreme Court for voting against Trump's wishes (as in John Roberts), do you really expect the courts to be anything but kangaroo courts?
Also, I could argue that Trump lies all the time and gets away with it, but that is not the point. The point is that Trump fired Yevgeny Vindman, and as far as I know his only "crime" was being the brother of Alexander Vindman. That is a clear cut example of vindictiveness.
When the jew drove Germanys finances into the ground it became a little bit more than a "political opponent".
It's like activists who burn down cities then claim to be "journalists" because they have a camera.
Typical jew shysters like the faggots who attacked Kyle Rittenhouse
You disappoint me. No, really. I was not even talking about the Holocaust, so why did you bring up your anti-semitic views? Do you even know what the Night of the long Knives is?
I wasn't speaking of "the shoah" because it didn't happen.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/TMQ1cEudc2Yg/
Stalin was a zionist plant. A partially mongoloid jew as to avoid suspicion. They teach children in israel that stalin was as bad as hitler to the jews which is just plain wrong. The fact stalin had a jew as a wife pokes a big hole in this little piece of propaganda.
I said nothing "anti-semitic" because the people you call jews aren't from the "semitic region".
Most people confuse the "night of long knifes" with "krystal night". Two separate events but one sounds cooler. Germany was very very nice to the jews until a young assassin killed an officer. A gay Nazi which the jews exploited their embarrassment, wiemar republic, honeypot child sex operations, yada yada yada.
You know, your blatant anti-semitism doesn’t contribute to the topic at all. If Trump would imprison Pence and the others he would definitely purge most of his political opponents, and even an person like yourself would not support that.
As I've said, there is no such thing as "anti-semitism". You're the one who brought up joey steel.
You don't know history and you don't know what I support.
Mother would not let Mr Pence pay with Mr Fat The Donald anymore, now Mr Wood and all of the Orange fans are calling Mr Conversion Therapy traitor.
This is what I call fucking HILLARYous.
Pence doesn't buy into Trump's bullshit now he's a traitor. Again, Hillary-ous.
Pence got a letter years ago, now didn't he. Q said "No deals for #2" years ago, didn't he? Hm.
https://qanon.news is offline on my side. I'm not into Q, but it has been like that for at least an hour or so.
qanon.pub is the main site I thought. Never used .news, but I haven't been following it all for too long.
Aha! Thx, didn't know. To all Q-haters: Qtards are good for alt news, even if you don't buy into it.
Lolenstein. Qpidity my fren, absolute Qpidity.
You're really a pain in the ass.. every comment yours is shit as fuck.. Please admins.. remove this guy here.. he thinks he is Reddit, lol
Hey asshole that's against free speech and wants a safe space where his bullshit can't be questioned, how about you, instead, go and get fucked by your fat Orange god?
Hihi you dumb cunt faggot fucker.
Bro, that's ok if you stay.. But people should know you're just a clown here.. Take a look on how many downvotes you get on EVERY shit you comment, lol.. It's hillarious :) Enjoy being a persona non grata..
Oh no downvoted from moronic Trumptard! If my love! The horror! My fee fees. Where's my chicken tendies mom?
Forget my downvoted, look how many replies I get to see my real impact, why, here you are you fucking moron feeding my Soros engine.
It's you that's fucking HILLARYous, and all you dumbass delusional right wing jerk offs in here stroking Donald straight into your mouths.
Enjoy the show! Nothing can stop what's cumming!
I see that as a desperate act.. Are you being (well) paid to fuck our liberties and future? Nothing can stop mankind to thrive. You did try before but now we're getting help. And that's how you will fail. Wonder if you're MK'd Ultra and act without any compassion, or a mercenary.. or you're just a tard.. "Soros engine" will eventually be hunted. Time is coming as elites desperate acts prove that.
Compassion! Here! Fucking HILLARYous. I was nice to everyone for two weeks and just saying my beliefs and was accosted, told to fucking kill myself, called for a hundred times, someone asked where I lived so he could come stab me, calls for me to be censored and banned.
Compassion.Hah! I have more fucking compassion in one finger than the entirety of the right wing of America.
Well, so call the authorities to call out that guy who threatened you.. Where's the proof to that? And more: Can you touch the other matters I mentioned in my comment, please?