Ok so it's a threat of litigation, which is pretty standard if someone smears you. Unless she is planning to testify in some ongoing court case, which I believe she is not, then it would not be witness intimidation as she is not longer a witness.
Will, imagine if you're that corporation, and imagine for a second IF she is lying, I will say if and give her the benefit of the doubt, she had fundamentally undermined the company and irreparably damaged is reputation in a global scale.
With the kind of money they have, the truth is irrelevant. If she's telling the truth, she doesn't have the capital to go toe to toe with a giant corporation, and she likely knows it. It's either defend the truth, or lose her life savings.
Dominion knows this, which is why they are throwing these lawsuits around. If they really believed these witnesses were lying, they'd pick on somebody their own size: Donald Trump
It doesn’t work that way. If you are an employer and the employee reports fraud especially if this is regarding federal contracts or state contracts then the employer has an obligation to investigate and is blocked from retaliating, terminating, harassing, or intimidation of the employee. So the employer / dominion is taking on a huge liability by acting this way. This is how guilty employers act when covering up fraud. In fact the employer is supposed to cooperate and report the fraud themselves to the authorities as soon as they are aware. She probably has a strong case already against dominion as a whistleblower.
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/dominion-attorneys-send-brutal-letter-to-trump-campaigns-so-called-star-witness-mellissa-carone/
Ok so it's a threat of litigation, which is pretty standard if someone smears you. Unless she is planning to testify in some ongoing court case, which I believe she is not, then it would not be witness intimidation as she is not longer a witness.
Because a corporation with limitless legal resources threatening an individual with a modest salary is justice.
Justice is blind, that's the point.
Will, imagine if you're that corporation, and imagine for a second IF she is lying, I will say if and give her the benefit of the doubt, she had fundamentally undermined the company and irreparably damaged is reputation in a global scale.
She may have cost hundreds of people future work.
I would sue her ass into next week.
So now it's about who has truth in their side.
Does that make any sense?
With the kind of money they have, the truth is irrelevant. If she's telling the truth, she doesn't have the capital to go toe to toe with a giant corporation, and she likely knows it. It's either defend the truth, or lose her life savings.
Dominion knows this, which is why they are throwing these lawsuits around. If they really believed these witnesses were lying, they'd pick on somebody their own size: Donald Trump
It doesn’t work that way. If you are an employer and the employee reports fraud especially if this is regarding federal contracts or state contracts then the employer has an obligation to investigate and is blocked from retaliating, terminating, harassing, or intimidation of the employee. So the employer / dominion is taking on a huge liability by acting this way. This is how guilty employers act when covering up fraud. In fact the employer is supposed to cooperate and report the fraud themselves to the authorities as soon as they are aware. She probably has a strong case already against dominion as a whistleblower.