The (((media)))
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (74)
sorted by:
Why? Those texts are apocryphal and gnostic * Coptic* texts and not the books of the Bible. They don't deal with the Old Testament at all.
You really have no fucking clue what you are talking about do you?
Also you’re a fucking shillbot, those texts are the oldest versions we have of many of the stories they contain, and thus are closer to the truth than your trash game of telephone English translation
The Nag Hammadi texts are early Christian gnostic books and not the oldest version of the Bible.
You are probably confusing them with the Qumran Caves Scrolls.
You are hilariously uneducated.
Cmon then eisen tell us the truth about this post, tell us how a small group of traveling merchants who have been systematically oppressed every second of their lives could have risen to such heights of accomplishment in our “structurally racist” world lmfao
You believe the bible, in English, is the literal word of god? Lmfao wow eisensize you’re dumber than I figured
No. What on earth makes you think so?
You talk of apocrypha dismissively as if that’s anything other than a reason to read it. Something usually reserved for retarded unthinkers.
Why are you asking me for a quote from the Nag Hammadi texts when we are talking about the book of Job?
The Book of Job is not part of these texts. Yet you claim that the Nag Hammadi texts somehow contain the original version of the book of Job.
Why would you claim something like that? The Nag Hammadi texts are Coptic texts from the 1-3rd century A.D. Written in Coptic.
The book of Job is almost 1000 years older and was written in Hebrew. The oldest fragments were found in the Dead Sea scrolls which are 500+ years older than the Nag Hammadi texts.
Just admit that you confused the two.