The (((media)))
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (74)
sorted by:
No. What on earth makes you think so?
You talk of apocrypha dismissively as if that’s anything other than a reason to read it. Something usually reserved for retarded unthinkers.
Why are you asking me for a quote from the Nag Hammadi texts when we are talking about the book of Job?
The Book of Job is not part of these texts. Yet you claim that the Nag Hammadi texts somehow contain the original version of the book of Job.
Why would you claim something like that? The Nag Hammadi texts are Coptic texts from the 1-3rd century A.D. Written in Coptic.
The book of Job is almost 1000 years older and was written in Hebrew. The oldest fragments were found in the Dead Sea scrolls which are 500+ years older than the Nag Hammadi texts.
Just admit that you confused the two.
Are you on fucking crack? I never said the book YOU reference was in the NH scrolls, I said I don’t take interpretations from the English version, and satan isn’t called an angel, ever, not even in your quote you retard, in fact it explicitly draws a line between satan and the angels.
So, when we were talking about a quote from the Book of Job why did you ask me to find that quote in the Nag Hammadi "scrolls"?
The Nag Hammadi texts do not contain the Book of Job so how exactly could I have found it there?
Besides, those texts are written in books, not on scrolls so it is very odd that you refer to them as scrolls.
Look, I know you mixed up the Nag Hammadi texts with the Qumran scrolls.
Mistakes can happen. No shame to admit it but your insistence on being right is just pathetic at this point.