199 days ago
Thisisnotanexit
removed comment by
BanMeIfYouHateGod -
>You're talking to him. Let's have a mock trial, shall we? You're purporting to be transparent, right? Then you should have no trouble justifying your actions. > 10 hours ago Thisisnotanexit removed
199 days ago
Thisisnotanexit
banned user
NotannAltofJG5 -
0 day nuke with reason: perma ban for constant disruption and subversion
199 days ago
Thisisnotanexit
removed comment by
JosephGoebbel5 -
Does that work in the workplace when you fire a black employee for insubordination, but give a White employee a warning?
199 days ago
Thisisnotanexit
removed comment by
JosephGoebbel5 -
Discrimination is discrimination, regardless of the type. That's no conflation at all to illustrate your arbitrary rule enforcement, especially of rules that don't exist. I'm asking if that defense ha
199 days ago
Thisisnotanexit
removed comment by
JosephGoebbel5 -
That's not an answer. If you're judging one side differently than the other for the same infractions, that's not discernment. That's discrimination.
199 days ago
Thisisnotanexit
removed comment by
JosephGoebbel5 -
You're avoiding the question on purpose because in any other scenario, it's not you who will decide if your actions were justified. You can repeat that all you want, but in the face of a jury, you're
199 days ago
Thisisnotanexit
removed comment by
JosephGoebbel5 -
You're talking to him. Let's have a mock trial, shall we? You're purporting to be transparent, right? Then you should have no trouble justifying your actions.
> 10 hours ago Thisisnotanexit removed
199 days ago
Thisisnotanexit
removed comment by
JosephGoebbel5 -
[Awaiting answers](https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARwsBQqcG/straight-from-the-last-epstein-f/c/4eZDpDfUmPa).
199 days ago
Thisisnotanexit
removed comment by
JosephGoebbel5 -
Amazing how when it's applied to the workplace, suddenly your argument crumbles...
Because it's clearly discrimination.
199 days ago
Thisisnotanexit
removed comment by
JosephGoebbel5 -
[I suppose Sam Bankman Fried should have had you as his lawyer](https://media.scored.co/post/8Rzl94BMvBMV.jpeg)...
199 days ago
Thisisnotanexit
removed comment by
JosephGoebbel5 -
In other words, you have no answers to justify your actions.
199 days ago
Thisisnotanexit
removed comment by
JosephGoebbel5 -
This is where you look not so discerning. You're running away despite saying you intended to be transparent. I linked a Scored image link that proved your argument was fallacious, and you pretend it d
199 days ago
Thisisnotanexit
removed comment by
JosephGoebbel5 -
> Let them eat cake!
This is that power lust I was talking about. Your arrogance is well documented.
199 days ago
Thisisnotanexit
removed comment by
JosephGoebbel5 -
[Your words as a legal defense](https://i.imgflip.com/aj6zlb.jpg)
199 days ago
Thisisnotanexit
removed comment by
JosephGoebbel5 -
Oh, right, because you've done a bangup job so far. You refuse to acknowledge evidence of your own actions, you refuse to justify your actions, and you flat out said you don't care...
199 days ago
Thisisnotanexit
removed comment by
JosephGoebbel5 -
Run away, Simba. Logic defeated you again. Looks like you didn't really want that trial afterall.
199 days ago
Thisisnotanexit
removed comment by
JosephGoebbel5 -
I know, but that makes no sense, seeing as all the context is right here. I highly doubt you have more people over there than here, as dead as this sub is.
But the facts are clear, and it's apparent
199 days ago
Thisisnotanexit
removed comment by
JosephGoebbel5 -
Every comment bumps it up again, and doesn't it pique curiosity why a thread would garner so many comments?
Bottom line here is you can't justify your actions, you just have an arrogant "because I s
199 days ago
Thisisnotanexit
removed comment by
JosephGoebbel5 -
> Literally no one mentions frazzledrip