whatever - they are creepy crawly bottom feeding bugs
OP Comments:
re: the "We have 1028 Days Left" protester at the French Open:
https://i0.wp.com/fresno24.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/GettyImages-1400864166-scaled.jpg
As we all know climate change is as much of a hoax as COVID19™, I stumbled across this meme, where Dr. Dolores Cahill described a grim future.
However, Dr. Cahill's predictions of ... yikes... I don't even want to think about the devastation... does roughly coincide with the "1028 days" warning to the world, from the French Open.
/prayers and peace be with all, in these times of evil leaders
give it time... you'll see them eventually.
So... you're saying... there should be no #chemtrails on hot days?
Because that's easily disproven.
my distrust of Elon and that still stands :)
pretty high bar.
honestly, how many people do you trust? more or less than 5?
i trust that elon is human - no angel. but neither am i, to be honest.
i judge ppl by actions as best i can, and so far, i don't have any itchy issues with any of the moves he's made.
i can't say the same thing about basically every other billionaire.
"Highly Reactive Chemicals" in Atmosphere
aka #chemtrails ?
Hydrogen is a better option.
It's a valid point.
But... the thing I like about EV is that electricity is the great "common denominator", so to speak.
For example, I can make electricity out of anything (solar, wind, thorium, hydrogen, petrol, uranium, wood, coal, "zero-point", etc.). Whereas, I can't make hydrogen out of wind, or coal.
Know what I mean?
At that level, EV seem smart from an industry perspective - "stable" - not going to have to retool the manufacturing infrastructure (every few decades?). Globally and locally, there will always be a way to produce electricity.
Right? Hmm. It's an interesting consideration for me - no matter how inefficient they are, currently. Improvements will come, I do believe.
There is probably a market for both EV and Hydrogen V - reasons why I would want to own both.
But let me finish with this: unless modern society implodes (and I give that a ~20% chance right now, and we are reduced to campfires and savagery again), the future is EV. Because once we have basketball-sized fusion devices (or Tesla's global power grid is realized), batts will no longer be necessary -- just lots of on-demand E!
Thanks for the communication. #cheers
PS. I was always impressed that Elon named his car company "Tesla" and not "Franklin". Millions of people around the world talk about the genius of N. Tesla now.
The current infrastructure can not support electric cars.
simple market mechanisms ( supply / demand ) will resolve.
Charge time makes reuse or extended use compromised.
meh - great for around the town.
Consumer Reports has annually stated design quality is inferior, substandard.
I honestly have no idea what that means - inferior to what?
No one needs to go 0 to 60 in 2.3 seconds unless you are on a race track.
1.1 seconds:
Who said anything about need? It's called fun.
Constant high acceleration shortens life of car and requires more costly repairs.
So don't do "ludicrous" mode all the time. Problem solved.
Resources consumed exceeds the defined metric of success of conversion.
the same could be said about private jets, and yet they are more popular than ever. What's your point? Are you some kind of environmentalist?
Life of vehicle shorter and less reliable and less user repairable.
Very true.
Far more dangerous in a collision.
Debatable.
Shd ayh go on?
I'm not convinced, so perhaps you should...
shitty useless cars
hahahah
fastest (0 - 60 in 2 seconds) , safest cars on the market.
for what it's worth, i would take you more seriously if you didn't use so much hyperbole.
Yes.. yes its his fault too.
Probably more our fault for letting the government take our money in the first place.
lol nah they won't be.
Pfizer will make sure there is plenty of Alien Vaccine for us, tho.
sometimes because they’d refill.
doesn't mean oil is regenerating.
could be that existing oil is just shifting to fill the emptiness left by the first pumping.
i.e., not new oil - just shifting from one location to another
right?
or do you know for a legit FACT that it's literally "new oil" (created within the last few years) ?
Earth's core makes it
-
how ? do we know the specific process, or are you just presenting your assumption?
-
at what rate (i.e., faster or slower than humans consume it) ?
3. is there any downside to burning tons and tons and tons of oil (for cars, industry , etc.) ?
I'm not an expert on this subject. but where there's smoke... the "peak oil" thing always smacked of "muh climate change" control via memes
yup, i get it... thank you.
in the wilderness for free
if you can find them
we're not talking about any ol' insect. we are talking about some very specific "bugs".
gold is free in the wilderness, too!
We eat crawdads, snails and fucking eggs.
Get over it.
SS:
The false flag / psyop alien invasion is going to be fucking epic.
#popcorntime
He is also stealing from you and me.
Stealing?
Is it Elon's fault that your government is giving-away your money?
Elon filled-out some paper-work, and your government cut a check. Elon stole nothing that your government hadn't already stolen from you.
I would suggest your grievances are with your government - not with Elon, who has simply managed to prove himself a good manager of capital: electrifying the auto industry and putting humans at the door-step of mars.
If you are going to continue allowing your government to steal money from you in the first place, you should at least hope they give the money to someone like Elon - instead of Bill Gates (who has just managed to cause a bunch of pandemics with his "grants"), or bailing-out the banksters (for the xth time).
#BillGatesForPrison
XP,
From this link you provided:
It says both this:
Abiogenic hypotheses generally reject the supposition that certain molecules found within petroleum, known as biomarkers, are indicative of the biological origin of petroleum. They contend that these molecules mostly come from microbes feeding on petroleum in its upward migration through the crust,
...and then this:
Modern geologists think that commercially profitable deposits of abiotic petroleum could be found, but no current deposit has convincing evidence that it originated from abiotic sources
So.... abiotic oil exists, but the oil we have used to fuel industry is has not been abiotic.
Is that what you understand, too?
is feeling the phone in your hand "thinking"?
yes, but fine - I get your point.
So you are equating work to simply "net expensed energy"?
Seems to be missing a lot of nuance, in my opinion.
And more to the point: what's your point?
Are you saying that Elon doesn't deserve the success he has - basically - because he pays other people to do the heavy lifting?
Do you think Elon should have done it all by himself?
Or maybe, at least it would more "fair" if he shared most of his wealth with his employees?
Like, the person who carries the trash (from one pile to another pile) should get paid more (like a LOT more - like 1000x more) than the engineer who doesn't work at all - just sits there and designs the rockets.
Thoughts?
97% hydrogen and carbon with traces of elements like oxygen, sulfur, nickel, vanadium, and some others making up the rest.
do we know the source of the hydrogen?
everything else sounds like "soil"
Wow you must really hate Elon to be pushing this narrative as aggressively as you are.
https://time.com/5400025/does-thinking-burn-calories/
While the brain represents just 2% of a person’s total body weight, it accounts for 20% of the body’s energy use
smart people work hard, too.
but i'll give you this: dumb people work harder.
regenerates how...?
regenerates from what... ? from dirt? what are the ingredients?
Well, which would you rather clean and maintain:
https://communities.win/c/projectfortyseven/p/15IETEz15c/elons-tiny-box-homes-/c
or
https://www.adondevivir.com/noticias/casas-unicas/los-10-secretos-esconde-la-millonaria-mansion-donde-vive-bill-gates/
thoughts?