3
xolotltlaloc 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Earth is flat and we know it.

you're not very convincing.

nigger

and you said the N word ?! :o shame on you.

12
xolotltlaloc 12 points ago +12 / -0

The biggest issue with "the flat earth" theory is that it assumes general physics is wrong. and not wrong by a little. like basically totally completely fundamentally incorrect.

that's a really tough sell.

you see... because of this open source body of knowledge known (in english) as "general physics", we can sit on our asses and mash away at the internet.

the same general physics predicts microwaves, F35's, submarines, skyscrapers, oh... and Earth is a globe.

suddenly - because a few retards discover "CGI" - they jump to the most logical conclusion: space is fake!!! ...and general physics is completely wrong - it's the only logical conclusion. :/

hmmm....

i saw the other day that AI is now generating realistic porn. somehow there's an association there - fake news, etc. it's only going to get worse, and retards are gonna start spinning out all over the place.

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

you think general physics is in you tool house? you don't apply fundamentals math to anything. or can you?

is that supposed to be english?

bad bot

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

so you aren't getting paid to push this nonsense?

you actually believe 1 + 2 = 7

?

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

i know... everyone is on it except you and me! :o

it's like we are living in pleasentville bro!

/you poor thing - for your sake, i hope you are getting paid to peddle this hysteria

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

PS, fuck you sleeper:

hahaha you're not very good at insulting people.

Your argument -> "pOp ScIeNcE mAgAzInE sAyS

no, my argument is... the internet works, because of our knowledge of general physics. agreed?

and... the same general physics we (humans) use to design rockets, satellites and digital imaging - oh, and that the Earth is a globe.

YOUR argument is... the basis for human civilization (general physics) is wrong - because you believe some photos you see on the internet are CGI. :)

fuck you -- as you sit there mashing away on the internet (built with general physics) ... fuck you again - you fat cunt.

2
xolotltlaloc 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dude, I checked out all sources and I would call out all of it.

ok so you believe that each one of those companies:

  • is lying about their satellites

  • is really just using planes

  • knows the truth - that the earth is flat

.... because you think it it looks like CGI.

and therefor, general physics as we know it is completely wrong -- you say -- with a completely straight face -- as you sit there mashing away on the internet -- built with general physics.

riiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

Wish I could point it out in person.

no thank you.

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

ozcams razor: you're an idiot

cheers bro - go play somewhere else

by pkvi
2
xolotltlaloc 2 points ago +2 / -0

CoVID failed?

yes

Is that before or after the shutdown, 100,000 businesses lost, totalitarian rules, experimental drugs in billions of people, countless dead from the experiment...

after - i didn't say it wasn't a bloody battle, but we won.

if they won, the lockdowns and mandates would still be in place, and most people wouldn't be on their 6th booster.

Ukraine failing? Is that before or after the another 14B of your $ going there?

after. i never said it wasn't costly. if they won, it would have been 100 billion.

FBI Raid failing? Is that before or after the nothing happens

nothing will happen to trump. their raid will be exposed as fraud, we won.

There is no semblance of winning when the best you have is "look we were right".

the best we have is... it would have been at least "double worse" if they had it their way.

The only winning is actual resistance that causes the people apologizing to be terrified and publicly panicking instead of casually going about their day as if 'oh well' or 'meh' or 'we got those suckers'.

Hold yourself to a higher standard.

fair point

2
xolotltlaloc 2 points ago +2 / -0

Please provide any images of space you believe are real.

here are 4 other private satellite imaging companies:

take your pick... choose your satellite... order specific images... or even live sat video, in some cases.

don't believe me? place an order - satellite imaging on demand.


ps. let me guess... all fake - even though they claim to use satellites, they use planes, not satellites - it's a huge hoax. everyone is in on it... is that about right?

by pkvi
5
xolotltlaloc 5 points ago +5 / -0

Are we winning yet, patriots?

That's a pretty broad / ill-defined / troly question. But OK, I'll bite:

Yes, we patriots are winning yet ;)

Russia Russia Russia™ - failed - exposed the rats #winning

Covid-19™ - failed - exposed the rats #winning

Ukraine™ - failing - exposing the rats #winning

FBI Raid™ - failing - exposing the rats #winning

i mean... with respect - name a major battle we "patriots" (people who love the constitution of the USA) have lost - apart from the 2020 elections, which was stolen.

have we won yet?

ohh.... "have we won yet" -- ok well... that's a different question.

no, we have not won - yet.

but we are pretty clearly and consistently #winning


ps. i'll give you this -- we patriots are always on defense, though, because - in my opinion - we patriots are not putting forth any realistic alternatives to the fascist opportunities presented by the WEF et al. we only win because they continuously shoot themselves in the foot. i.e., we win by default ;)

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

That looks real to you?

maybe a bit overproduced, but yes - the images of Earth are legit - not Hollywood CGI.

whatever. you don't like ISS - fine...

here are 4 other private satellite imaging companies:

take your pick... choose your satellite... order specific images... or even live sat video, in some cases.

don't believe me? place an order - satellite imaging on demand.


ps. let me guess... all fake - even though they claim to use satellites, they use planes, not satellites - it's a huge hoax. everyone is in on it... is that about right?

elon's reusable rockets are going to put folks like you out of business - you'll be accessing the internet via skylink, and claim super fast carrier pigeons are actually being used. lol

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

So says the guy assuming flat earth is wrong

"presuming" would be more accurate. and there is a LOT on which to base that presumption.

it's not like i woke-up one day, watched a youtube video, and declared the open source body of knowledge that is generally referred to as "general physics" to be false. :D

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, just one account.

who cares, you are all the same

gulible sucker

hahaha yes... one of us is.... cheers ;)

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

hi again - multiple accounts ? classy.

I sent you videos that proves you are just wrong and you don't acknowledge them.

fuck you ok ... one second... i'll go find your fucking videos and watch your bullshit... fuck you again....

.

.

...some time later (fuck you for wasting my time)

.

.

  1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rE3QOj6t48c

ok so basically neal degrass tyson says some shit about some parachute jump (which one?) and some shit about wide angle lenses.

firstly, he specifically calls the earth a ball. #oops

and he was only speaking to the lunacy that someone in a balloon can float into space.

secondly, fuck you and fuck neal degrass tyson - both of you are stupid cunts.

  1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lLmW5Y8BFw

ahh yes.. the ol' "but but horizon" bullshit.

this video is so full of half-truth nonsense - it's a brilliant psyop. fuck you and your extremely dangerous / treasonous pysop.

  1. https://youtu.be/xFqzMhoZi5o

for fuck sake... you guys have a fucking "institute" now??

congratulations. nicely played.


ps.

let me ask you something...

do you know how the internet works?

SPOILER: as all processes in the known universe, "the internet" works according to the laws of a collection of knowledge commonly known as -- in english -- "general physics".

general physics is great, because you can use this collection (it's all open source) of time-tested knowledge to successfully predict clever inventions like the internet, skyscrapers, microwaves, F-35's, etc.

oh, and general physics predicts Earth is a globe.

but you're saying that this time-tested body of knowledge (general physics) is all wrong....

...and you base this theory on the simple fact that "the photos from ISS don't look real to me".

hmmm...... fuck you cunt.

and also fuck you thrice more.

good luck with your institute... i suggest you guys target the evangelicals... I believe the St. James bible says the Earth is flat... right after it told the perfectly factual story about Jesus turning water into wine.

fuck you and your sick psyop cult.

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Alright well have fun going to the iss

since you mention the ISS....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86YLFOog4GM

...what part of these images don't look real to you?

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

i actually disagree with GP on this one. the photo does not appear to be photoshopped. but who cares? the FBI has an aberrant track record.

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Someone who makes a comment to a post to get a rise on people.

... said the flat earther :)

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

if you had any indisputable ammunition you would have fired it off 6 hours ago.

you mean other than all the links to nasa and iss and google maps?

fuck off

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you haven't found anything irrefutable by now

you mean other than all the links to nasa and iss and google maps?

fuck off

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'll accept anything that looks real

hahaha... "looks real" ?? lol.... according to you? who thinks the earth is flat? ... fuck off :)

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

it changes shots every 2 minutes.

so? you think that live snapshots every 2 minutes somehow disqualifies the digital images?

like i said... you keep redrawing the goal post.

so... you win - good job. peace out.

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't care if it's nasa, space x, russian, or Chinese.

wait... you will accept photos from nasa, spacex etc... or you won't ?

i'm a little confused.

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Digital pictures are fine.

ok so... digital is OK but no nasa.

Now quit arguing semantics

hahah... nah mate you keep redrawing the line.

i give you a photo, you say it can't be nasa.

can it be russian government photos, or no government photos - only phots fm privately owned satalites?

i am just trying to understand the rules of your little mind game.

what say you?

1
xolotltlaloc 1 point ago +1 / -0

of course it's computer generated... you think think they send-up film? and then what... drop it back down for development at the walgreens ?lol!

how about the mobile phone cam... you have... for selfies...

all your selfies are fake because they are computer generated - not kodak film - is your pitch ?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›