Current PCR Testing Produces 97% False Positives
1) DR FAUCI:
“if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more that the chances of it being replication competent are minuscule…you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle. So I think if somebody comes in there with 37/38 even 36 you gotta say it’s just dead nucleotides period.”
2) NYT
"Most tests set the limit at 40";
"Any test with a cycle threshold above 35 is too sensitive, agreed Juliet Morrison, a virologist at UC, Riverside. “I’m shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive,”
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
3) MIT
MIT confirms: its own COVID19™ tests are set to 40 amplification cycles.
https://medical.mit.edu/covid-19-updates/2020/11/pcr-test-result
4) CAMBRIDGE
As if any is needed - I already quote FAUCI, MIT and NYT -- not sure why you would need any more proof, but... here you go...
Makes sense: University of Cambridge recently found 100% false positives - during one full testing cycle - across ~4000 students:
https://twitter.com/pcrclaims/status/1336679025335545857
https://adapnation.io/cambridge-uni-exposes-the-extent-of-false-positives/
5) COURT CONFIRMATION
As if any is needed - I already quote FAUCI, MIT, NYT & CAMBRIDGE -- not sure why you would need any more proof, but... here you go...
Portuguese courts have recently cited:
"“if someone is testing by PCR ...when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most labs in EU and the US), ...the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”"
6) ANECDOTALLY CONFIRMED BY ELON MUSK:
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1327125840040169472?lang=en
7) INVENTOR OF PCR:
Still not enough? Here's the inventor of the PCR test:
8) QUARANTINES
Also quarantine would not work because hardly anybody would be released
People with a weak flu are testing positive (falsely) for SARSCOV2.
2 weeks of downtime usually clears up a cold.
9) AU/NZ
PCR tests are no different in AU/NZ:
BOTTOM LINE:
That 400,000 "COVID19™ Deaths" statistic is TOTALLY (97%) bullshit.
In truth, very very very very VERY few people are actually dying of COVID -- IF ANY!
For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 3.8 additional conditions or causes per death.
i.e., COVID19 is THE FLU -- simply breaks the camel's (already overloaded) back.
ATTN: LAWSUITS ... LET THE LAWSUITS BEGIN!
If someone sticks a penis into your body without your permission, it is #rape.
If someone sticks a knife into your body without your permission, it is attempted #murder.
If someone sticks a needle into your body without your permission, it is criminal #assault.
Mandatory #vaccines™ are a crime.
Telling someone they cannot go to work or travel until they have been vaccinated, is no different than holding a person hostage until they agree to be raped...
...in which case, the crime is upgraded to include criminal confinement and extortion (in addition to rape/criminal assault).
#changemymind
REMEMBER THIS:
The crimes of forcing someone to be "jabbed" before they can travel, are:
-
"criminal confinement"
-
"extortion"
-
and "criminal assault" (assuming a forced jab occurs)
I bring interesting / good news....
Was just listening to the latest from Tracy BEANZ
re: the TIME Magazine "cabal" article
https://youtu.be/O7nmMcygEpk?t=3269
54:29 ...and then someone else 54:31 said something pretty poignant 54:33 i'm guessing there's some big bombshell 54:35 coming out if they're trying to put 54:36 lipstick on this
This stood-out to me. Poignant, as BEANZ said.
Now I am just watching the latest from Simon PARKS:
https://www.simonparkes.org/post/8th-february-update-current-news
For context ... SKIP TO 10:30
Then 30 seconds later (@ 10:58) Simon says:
"[the whitehats in the military are demanding court authority to act against Biden - history needs to record that] we weren't staging a coup - we were staging something to save the Republic"
VS. that insane TIME® article:
"a vast, cross-partisan campaign to protect the election"
With respect to the "poignant" comment BEANZ quoted... I do believe PARKS just confirmed that sentiment to be correct!
BOTTOM LINE: the military is waiting for some formal court decisions before "the storm" (so to speak).
i.e., We are currently - at this very moment - in "the calm". With court cases in play this month, I believe we can expect the storm to hit in March or April.
So that TIME® magazine article was basically a coded warning by and for cabal members -- a "do or die" call to arms -- w/ potentially violent implications manifesting over the next few weeks.