Awesome list! I think the hi res image is another great way to archive sources, since the posts on social media including good old Reddit have gotten removed left and right.
And yesterday, Henry Kissinger, a 97-year-old former US diplomat, said the United States will have to reach an understanding with China on a new global order to ensure stability or the world will face a dangerous period like the one which preceded World War One.
Mar 26, 2021 -- U.S. needs new understanding with China or it risks conflict, Kissinger says
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-china-kissinger-idUSKBN2BI2MK
Hm, he probably knows it sounds like a threat, right?
Jeez. This is like saying there's no clear evidence that the building 7 was brought down by controlled demolition.
The mayor of Oakland, California at the centre of this story is Libby Schaaf and this one is not her first time to reap national protests.
①
On Jan 17, 2018, she said that she's willing to go to jail fighting against the ICE' major sweep in Northern California. [LINK 01]
②
And on Feb 24, 2018, she tweeted about the upcoming ICE operations in the Bay Area, which could be a public notification to illegal immigrants in the Oakland area. [LINK 02]
③
According to Thomas Homan, the acting director of the ICE at that time; more than 800 criminal illegals in Northern California were able to avoid arrest due to Libby Schaaf's warning. [LINK 03]
④
On the aforementioned tweet, she said "Interested residents should consult the website http://www.centrolegal.org/acilep/ to understand their rights and options in the event they face detention or know someone who needs legal representation."
⑤
Not surprisingly, Centro Legal de la Raza (http://www.centrolegal.org/acilep/) is connected to George Soros' Open Society Foundation (OSF). [LINK 04]
According to the PDF linked earlier, in 2017 OSF's Communities Against Hate initiative donated $100,000 to Centro Legal de la Raza.
⑥
With other East Bay organizations, Centro Legal de la Raza has formed the Alameda County Immigration Legal & Education Partnership (ACILEP). ACILEP has received over $1 million in tax-payer funds, with the Alameda County Board of Supervisors allocating $750,000 and the City of Oakland allocating $300,000. [LINK 05]
⑦
Forget about Libby Schaaf. People like her can't act or speak a thing without a political support which comes with financial supports. Ask what a so called globalist like George Soros would want? And why?
Of course.
Like I said earlier in my comment;
many things are pointing that the virus, the one they call "novel coronavirus" or "covid-19," has not been completed for the use. A dud if you may. The outcome that said virus was supposed to cause or the 2020 pandemic is the polished theatrics of scripted versions, and its data on patients & casualties are obviously manufactured.
All of those for three or four legit objectives from their perspectives, I can give them that.
Still,
although the latest iteration of coronavirus was a dud, what I've found supports the idea that it's correct to theorize they have been developing a new version of coronavirus as well as many factions were aware of it well before 2019 Summer.
Note: I realized my second comment came off not as clear as I wanted. I edited the comment so it can read clearer and closer to what I really meant.
Pleasure! :)
Edited to make this comment read clearer and closer to what I really meant
I'm guessing you're referring to the widespread conception about the 2020 pandemic which is that there's no so called covid-19 virus, and that the patients & casualties are of something else such as other respiratory diseases.
The first part is a possibility and we can see the second part is what's really going on.
But,
I tend to believe there is a new version of coronavirus they were manufacturing: It's just they had to use the "not completely developed" one (which turned out to be a flop) because, going off schedule, it had to be the beginning of 2020.
Long ago I heard these rumours that they wanted to weaponize "Middle East respiratory syndrome–related coronavirus," a.k.a MERS or MERS-CoV.
And the following is what I found:
①
While investigating on MERS-CoV in June 2012, Ali Mohamed Zaki, an Egyptian virologist, isolated and identified a previously unknown coronavirus from a patience's lungs. [LINK 01] [LINK 02]
②
On behalf of Dr. Ali Mohamed Zaki's request, Ron Fouchier, molecular virologist at Erasmus University Medical Center and Ian Lipkin, epidemiologist at Columbia University started working on the virus, and they found two things: Early research suggested the virus is related to one found in the Egyptian tomb bat, and the virus isolated from a bat looked to be a match to the virus found in humans. [LINK 03] [LINK 04] [LINK 05]
③
On May 04, 2013; by the WHO's request, the virus was transferred from Erasmus MC at Rotterdam, Netherlands to Canada's a National Microbiology Laboratory facility at Winnipeg, Manitoba. For this one, unfortunately there's no publicly available source.
④
On Nov 16, 2015; an Italian TV channel, TG Leonardo, Rai 3, and other outlets such as Nature Publishing Group reported that Chinese lab experimented with a "bat x rat SARS-like pulmonary disease supervirus." In the report, scientists claim "this research is too risky" and said scientists requested China and the WHO to stop the research. But China did not. [LINK 06 - Minute from 04.55 to 07.09] [LINK 07] [LINK 08]
⑤
On Jan 2018, China's first level-04 bio lab put into operation. And it's in Wuhan, Hubei. [LINK 09]
⑥
Although Canadian authority retroactively said it's no relation to COVID-19 virus, Canada's CBC news reported on Aug 02, 2019 that a Canadian scientist who is a Chinese national sent deadly viruses to the Wuhan bio lab without the Public Health Agency of Canada's knowledge, months before RCMP was asked to investigate. This unauthorized shipment may have been a part of the RCMP investigation into the researchers who were evicted from the National Microbiology Laboratory. [LINK 10]
Many things are pointing that the virus itself has not been completed for the use. Originally they were planning to use it around 2024, and it was the tool to make the mass to accept the vaccination, which in turn was disguised clinical trials of their technologies thru CRISPR. The technologies that would be able to greatly enhance their longevity, mood, and cognitive abilities.
However,
in 2019 they really had to do something. They couldn't tolerate any more deviations from their intended courses of ... geopolitics. (I'll skip talking about this point since it's going get tediously longer.)
And they realized you don't need a pandemic. You'd only need a pandemic fear in order for the mass to accept the vaccination.
I once saw a post here saying, I am paraphrasing, "Virus is a hoax but vaccine is not." The sentiment is I would say 75% right.
Edited to Add :
I guess this was bound to happen: They found that no matter how hard they push people down, they couldn't generate enough of the mass acceptance for the vaccination. And they are also expecting heavy resistance against vaccine passport programs. So, they're looking into new opportunities of building this vaccination into more of your norms.
Mar 23, 2021 -- Moderna Eyes Dual Covid-19, Flu Vaccine [LINK]
It's amusing in some way.
If Gab creates its own cryptocurrency, those people in the machine will just meddle with/at the exchange or at the other transactions. But I agree with the idea that Gab should go with the digital currency route since those coins have become mainstream.
Of course, that is correct from the mainstream views held by the mainstream academia.
However, since we are gathered here on this particular board, here's a tin foil hat version:
①
During 1950s
The wealthiest faction of top-tier bankers: Gentlemen, in this rate we will have the society where any peasants can generate success, join higher rank guilds, and subscribe the fruits of life. And we just can't continuously have wars either. Before it's too late, we must look for a society or a nation and run a test how far autocracy can prevail. We're not just looking to build an updated version of medieval feudalism. This is an aspirations of world domination.
②
1960s-70s
????
"Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose." — David Rockefeller [LINK]
③
At the beginning of 1970s
George HW Bush: (To those wealthiest of top-tier bankers) Hey guys. I'm not sure you remember me but I'm a Bush's son. Union Banking Corporation? Haha, I'm great. Thanks. Anyway, I just admire what you guys are doing, so would love to be any help of some kind. Thanks in advance!
④
1970s-80s
See what had happened with George HW Bush and what he was doing especially in related to China and the US foreign policy mechanisms.
⑤
At the end of 1980s
All the parties involved: This is a critical period for our project. One thing we cannot allow is the westernization of this great society. Hence we would need to educate Chinese people before proceeding any further. Any thoughts?
Jiang Zemin: I got an idea. And I guarantee that your objective will be fulfilled. In return, instead of Li Peng, let me work as the General Secretary of the CCP.
Tiananmen Square Massacre ensued.
⑥
At the beginning of 1990s
Said bankers to the Bushes, the POTUS, & the other willing factions in the US bureaucrats (and also possibly to the military complex of Israel): Now you're going to bring China into the world's mainstream and also going to rapidly enrich the nation financially. This should be accompanied by you helping to furnish the nation with top technologically advanced measures. And it should be for every possible layers. Why? Hm. I now know who the ignorants are. It's because China is going to be our next new hub: The nation would be most capable and it should admired. So all the other nations will willingly apply China's systems to their own. What do YOU get in return? Money & power, of course. If successful, you can finally sit with us.
⑦
1990s
-
Selling the US's & UK's intelligence analysis and military technology & classified information has started to flourish.
-
1 USD to CNY: 5.8 → 8.8 > Asian financial crisis
-
Although there were many other nations that offered the similar or same labour cost as China's such as Indonesia and Thailand, many many businesses (almost all businesses in fact) started to move the factory to China even with forced technology transfer.
⑧
2000s
China became a member of WTO on Dec 11, 2001
Thanks! ^^
My guess is that they selected his Emmy winning pompous mug because he's the most well known out of those five. If you need to push one of your relatives down the stairs to make a scene, pick a popular one. In the same logic, I would have picked the pretty face from Cali, but I guess he hasn't outlived his usefulness yet.
Ah, I see. (In my opinion) There is this machine existed at the top, not a couple of puppet masters in the background. However, if you are looking for what are the current projects by the lieutenants of Cede & Co. and its connected arms such as Depository Trust Company and Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation; you might want to look into what JPMorgan Chase, BlackRock, and players like Michael C. Bodson are up to these days. Probably my research is too short, but it is pointing that nowadays they are all so enthusiastic for this thing called ESG Score, a monarchic rule to control livestock & agriculture industry and other private businesses.
Just being curious: Are you looking for certain connections on Citadel - Point72 - DTCC? Or on Clinton Foundation - SEC - CIA? Cede & Co. itself isn't that much. Think (power) transformers: like the Wikipedia page says, it is the entity that processes transfers of stock certificates on behalf of Depository Trust Company, the system that is used by the US national market system.
You don't have to go into that level to see their so called endgame.
All the globalist want is not much and it's not that complicated: They want to control us more effectively. And they just can't stand we have human rights as they do. "What have the normies contributed to better this world? And even if so, how much?", they asked themselves. Their answer was totalitarianism. That's why there is the current version of China, and the rest of the world is heading to become China.
What kind of economic and social systems we'd have, they don't care. And such as carrying out mass migration or normalizing deviance & depravity; those are all simply divide & conquer tools. They would need to dismantle our social norms in order to push us into more quickly accepting "we will own nothing and be happy."
Tidbit #1: You've probably heard about forced technology transfer (FTT). Because of the practice alone, moving the manufacturings to China, which George HW Bush had started to actualize since his vice days, doesn't really make sense from every business perspectives, except regarding direct labour costs. And even if you want to run your factory there, let's say, for over five to ten years, you would need to think about what not being able to purchase the necessary site & building in China means. Then, why it had to be China? Why those cliques in the US helped China to become a WTO member despite the terrible optics at that time caused by Tiananmen Square Massacre? Weren't there any other third world nations where the "a cent per hour" labour cost was offered? [In case you'd want the source for the graph in the family photo op above.]
Tidbit #2: The previous US administration put hefty tariffs & sanctions on China's semiconductor and IT industry. Did you know so called the US Business Roundtable hated those tariffs & sanctions or any turbulence in the US-China trade? They have been adamantly against the US placing China's tech companies such as Huawei and Hikvision on the blacklist, and behind the curtain they have been trying to help China's semiconductor industry. I am wondering why. Read here about the mainstream take on why Goldman Sachs is siding with China regarding Huawei.
And see what Tsinghua Unigroup, a.k.a the symbol of rising Chinese semiconductor industry, is. See who are on its advisory board. And where the previous US administration push them to. [1] [2] [3] [4] This is why Wall Street and Billionaires backed the Biden ticket on the last election. [5] [6]
"Now, the nonstarter is, for Russia, the idea that Assad stays in power and continues to control means there’s a guarantee that there will never be peace or security in that country, because so many—so many, you know, bottles have been broken here, man. I mean, there’s no way he can put that together."
— Joe Biden, Jan 23, 2018. During the discussion of the CFR's Foreign Affairs article he coauthoured, "How to Stand Up to the Kremlin: Defending Democracy Against Its Enemies."
The whole panel discussion is worth reading (or listening to) if you're interested in what this Obama 2.0 administration will be up to in terms of geopolitics in Hormuz strait. Related links are below.
It's not a super secret he's a spineless war hawk. Joe Biden was one of the seventy seven senators who voted for the Iraq War. And the current secretary of state was there too. [LINK] So, people who voted him into the office, how many there you are, remember: This is what you voted for.
Related Links
Panel Discussion: Jan 23, 2018 -- Foreign Affairs Issue Launch with Former Vice President Joe Biden
https://www.cfr.org/event/foreign-affairs-issue-launch-former-vice-president-joe-biden
Article: Jan/Feb 2018 -- How to Stand Up to the Kremlin: Defending Democracy Against Its Enemies
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2017-12-05/how-stand-kremlin
Ikr? In fact the tinfoil hat me is suspecting that the next step is the fed's trying to collapse the US dollar supremacy (as they play both teams).
Like the CNBC article says, they said not all but most would be restored before tomorrow. But this was the water cooler talk today with combination of the following:
① although we all are familiar with the headline where Ms. Yellen criticized bitcoin publicly, she has actually insinuated that the fed is considering to adopt a "central bank digital currency," [LINK]
② the rumour is that the new US admin (the Obama clique), via a fed system, has already invested in bitcoin, and a state sponsored faction tried to hack the transaction earlier today (Not sure about this myself but it's an interesting one nonetheless),
③ another raging rumour about this month almost a trillion being laundered thru bitcoin,
④ and of course last week the CCP appears it's officially announcing to the whole world it has just started spurring on their trial of the digital yuan which would intimidate the US currency's global dominance. [LINK] This concerns Bill Gates, the Bushes, and George Soros since they are said to have deeply invested in Tencent and Ant group.
The news you'd hear from the MSM is this:
The Supreme Court declined on Monday Feb. 22, 2021, to hear a dispute over whether absentee ballots received up to three days after Election Day in Pennsylvania should have been counted in the 2020 presidential election. And they will make sure to let you know that the Trump team's voter fraud arguments stand no chance even in front of a conservative Supreme Court. (Is it? ?)
This decision has split the court and prompted dissents from three justices: Thomas, Gorsuch and Alito.
Now,
let's hear from Justice Clarence Thomas on, in my opinion, why it's embarrassing for the Supreme Court not to deal with the case.
THOMAS, J., dissenting. Supreme Court of the United States
20-542 Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Degraffenreid (02/22/2021)
[Link - PDF] [Archived Link - PDF]
A few excerpts:
Elections are “of the most fundamental significance under our constitutional structure.” Through them, we exercise self-government. But elections enable self-governance only when they include processes that “giv[e] citizens (including the losing candidates and their supporters) confidence in the fairness of the election."
...
Two years ago, a congressional election in North Carolina was thrown out in the face of evidence of tampering with absentee ballots. Because fraud is more prevalent with mail-in ballots, increased use of those ballots raises the likelihood that courts will be asked to adjudicate questions that go to the heart of election confidence.
...
In short, the postelection system of judicial review is at most suitable for garden-variety disputes. It generally cannot restore the state of affairs before an election. And it is often incapable of testing allegations of systemic maladministration, voter suppression, or fraud that go to the heart of public confidence in election results.
...
Our refusal to do so by hearing these cases is befuddling. There is a clear split on an issue of such great importance that both sides previously asked us to grant certiorari. And there is no dispute that the claim is sufficiently meritorious to warrant review. By voting to grant emergency relief in October, four Justices made clear that they think petitioners are likely to prevail. Despite pressing for review in October, respondents now ask us not to grant certiorari because they think the cases are moot. That argument fails.
...
One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us. I respectfully dissent.
https://twitter.com/SteveGuest/status/1361877221670080514?s=20
The central principle of Xi Jinping is that there must be a united, tightening control in China, and he uses his rationale for the things he does based on that. I point out to him, no American president can be sustained as a president if he doesn’t reflect the values of the United States, and so the idea that I’m not going to speak out against what he’s doing in Hong Kong, what he’s doing with the Uyghurs in western mountains of China, and Taiwan, trying to end the One China Policy by making it forceful, I say – and by the he says – he gets it.
I've been tracking what the new US admin and its military forces have been doing in terms of foreign policy and diplomatic relations. Even before the inauguration, so many things have pointed at least the very top layers of this admin & their sponsors consist of hyper pro Beijing personnel (especially those who really adore Xi Jinping's Princelings), but I thought we owe them to see what they would actually carry out.
Then, on the Feb 03 when the state department said "the US' support of the one-China policy over Taiwan has not changed," I finally stopped speculating what kind of foreign policies they would implement in the coming years. Hm. ... Maybe this state department doesn't know what supporting the one-China policy actually means.
Ah, I see. It WAS quite dispiriting.
If I insist on being rude, I'd like to suggest: When it comes to watching the state (?), do try to discard what they say. Focus on the big picture what they do entails.
ಠ_ಠ Why the helplessness? If you mind my asking.
Too many data points are indicating that what's been going on is a manipulated event in which the majority of the world's top echelons have agreed to participating.
What's interesting is,
the current leading theories say these vaccines have nothing to do with helping our bodies develop immunity to the so called covid-19 virus. (Those theories aren't concerned with so called population control either.)
Now, seemingly the virus is not what the authorities worldwide want to talk about. Clearly, the vaccine or vaccination is. -- Thing is, whether or not those pharmaceutical companies have had a chance to observe any mass hypercytokinemia and/or viral shedding syndrome* during the clinical trials, sadly the most populations would soon need to accept the vaccination.
*The rumour is Sinopharm has already been testing viral shedding syndrome with their products. And now they say they would need to "assess results from overseas Phase III clinical trials to decide whether its two-shot COVID-19 vaccine should be followed by a booster shot." [LINK] -- Since no proper investigation on the China's epicentre has been performed yet [LINK], it'd be interesting to see how the Western governments and related institutions would respond to what the Sinopharm's executive said.
Not super relevant but interesting:
Mar 02, 2021 -- COVID-19 Vaccine Can Cause ‘False Positives’ on Breast Cancer Mammograms
https://www.healthline.com/health-news/covid-19-vaccine-can-cause-false-positives-on-breast-cancer-mammograms