Are visible observations not part of science?
Aside from cost and need for location tracking, the fisheye lense distortion makes straight lines look curved and vice versa
No problem. I agree to disagree. Interesting to see people showing the curvature of earth with fisheye lenses. Makes it look concave and convex. Anyways, the current scientific explanation is that what we can observe came from nothing ("big bang"), humans eventually evolved from the elements that spawned from the bang over billions of years, and we are on a spinning spheroid hurling through "space". Seems legit... Jk it's a fabrication of reality to me. There may be some tidbits of truth and deception in the current narrative. And there may be tidbits left out entirely.
I'm not a scientist or anything... However, can't trust the scientific explanation. Can't believe the festering freemasonic, occult, satanist cabaal that spoon feeds the population what they should know as "fact" or "the current thing"
GENESIS 1:14 - 18. They are lights. Modern scientific explanation is deceiving
Yeah, humans can travel through the impenetrable firmament because science said so!
Basically right. I can't accept it from a freemason either. And it kinda contradicts the bible. So I am torn at the moment
Lol some people go a little too far. Either way, I'm not 100 % convinced flat or globe. I've been taught the regular narrative but it doesn't really resonate with me as I think critically about where we are and what we are and what we are told is fact. It's a journey and there are haters on both sides. I'm in the middle... Some things make sense for flat and some things make sense for globe in my mind.
And there we have it. He does call the nasholes social criminals for what it's worth
Don't stars appear to spin consistent with the procession of their daily cycle? So north of the equator, they appear to spin counterclockwise when looking north. South of the equator, they appear to spin clockwise when looking south. If that is correct, then the stars are all moving across the sky in the same direction?! One would have to be in the south of the equator looking north to observe a counter clockwise apparent motion of the stars. Is this correct/does this make sense?
He also doesn't say anything pro globe...
Wouldn't this be a straight line on a flat earth? Like the ww2 air map of the world... I've noticed the curves of flight paths are actually straight shots when using maps with the north pole at the center and the south pole surrounding all the continents and oceans.
And they crashed into the firmament,... What a loss... Maybe humanity will get into space next time XD
Believe what you want to, I was indoctrinated in the current government approved curriculum too and am pretty familiar with it. I just can't bring myself to believe what these occult satanist Freemasons say is true. It's up to you if you wanna believe it. I'm not fully with flat earth but I'm skeptical of the current narrative. One thing I hold onto is the firmament that God created to separate the waters below from the waters above. A solid firmament that declares His handywork. How NASA penetrates it to go to "space"? Beats me. Can't bring myself to take their CGI as fact and religiously follow it.
I agree, wikipedia isn't a solid source but it does have some useful information. That's why I said for what its worth (which is apparently not a lot)
Ok so I'm an asshole and my intelligence has been insulted by a simple math problem. I took college math all the way to calc 2. And I have made yt videos although not on this subject. Sorry man but I don't think this is a fruitful conversation anymore. I try to keep it a civilized adult conversation. Hey, we are all taught the same standard stuff in k-12 and I remember most of it. Heck, I remember when Pluto was the 9th planet but scientists agreed to change that. The shape of the earth is a touchy subject and sometimes people can't get their opinions out without confrontation or insults. I'll try to refrain from commenting on your stuff. GG man, have a good day.
And that's the mainstream science narrative. We all have seen where the woke mainstream has brought us.
That's what we have been forcefully spoonfed the last 500 years. People believed otherwise prior. And NASA is full of Freemasons/occultists. Trust the government?
I don't have to do anything. We are bouncing ideas and having conversation. Getting to the truth, hopefully. Using documents, literature and research. Trust the gov? That's up to you. One thing I always consider is geocentrism has been around a lot longer than heliocentrism. Trust NASA' doctored images from Freemasons and occultists? Its up to you. I've never been high up enough to see what it really looks like and i'd assume you haven't either. Besides CGI and other crap we are forcefully fed. Also water is always flat and level hence "sea level".
Just like gravity is just a theory, not a fact or truth although an effect is measurable, it is just a theory
Also coriolos is a "inertial or fictitious force that appears to act on a mass..."
For what it's worth, wikipedia article on coriolis says that water does not drain different directions above or below the equator.
I personally think that the smarter every day channel is paid off or shills for the current narrative. Not to attack you or anything but I can almost see right through that dude. 9 out of 10 scientists agree because the truthers are shunned, demonized or outright killed. Just my opinion.
Dang man I usually get a's and b's :( Well aren't we taught that the earth is tilted on its axis? So in the globe earth model wouldn't one hemisphere have more sunlight and heat than the other regardless of the equator? Also if the earth is an oblate spheroid, wouldn't the part of the globe that jets out further be closest to the sun? One last thing: wouldn't the sun rays heat be kinda negligible between the northern and southern hemisphere since we are so far away and apparently receive the rays at a similar angle and intensity? Just some food for thought. And I realize that these things are elementary and taught to humans at an early age and well agreed upon by "scientists" since the heliocentric model was adopted around 500 years ago.
The globetards like to push the current theory supported by occult institutions. Lol... What if both trains of thought are wrong and we are all duped? In the end (revelation 6:14) the sky will recede like a scroll.