by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess they will need to hide in an embassy before being jailed indefinitely awaiting extradition to India.

▲ 3 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't knock it. Free, anonymous forums have the potential to create "hiveminds" that can be used for good.

▲ 6 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes, the election was stolen. Everything else is garbage to discredit that idea and to divide conservatives against each other.

▲ 5 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is how laborers in China eat lunch! Saw it with my own eyes.

Damn that's heartbreaking. Kindergartners .

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wonder which rules (if any) they would site if asked.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

The point of course being that it was a shill comment to dilute the issue brought up by this post.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who are these women? I'm curious about how they are used in propaganda.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let me explain the sleight of hand. Take a (slightly) complex fact like Jews comprising both an ethnicity and a religion and then distil it into absolutes. You can then argue that because Jews follow Judaism, they are not an ethnic group, because Judaism is not an ethnic group. You could just as easily argue that Jews are not a religious group, because their ethnic heritage is not a religion.

The whole point is to set up the argument that Jews are not a people and therefore not a legitimate target for genocide because (according to the person advancing these arguments) genocide must target a people.

The whole things falls apart when you realize, as u/pkvi kindly pointed out, that the Jews are both an ethnic and a religious group. The argument is a false dichotomy: Being part of an ethnic group does not preclude being part of a religious group, even if they share the same name.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnoreligious_group

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've seen this again and again. One of the tasks of shills is to drain the enthusiasm out of opposition political movements. "Your vote does not matter" is an old, old standby. You will even hear, "It is better if we do not vote at all because..." If you care at all about your country, do not fall for it.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

That sounds like a tactic Democratic Party operatives would try. I'll try to find a link to that post.

▲ 4 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 4 points ago +4 / -0

The trial is being kept quiet because they are afraid that powerful people could get implicated.

▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

u/axolotl_peyotl must be directly over the target for this trash to appear.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is sometimes true, but not always. They can also ban garbage and also allow good sources of information.

They could even ban something to lend credence to it in a backhanded way, but that would be sophisticated.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is the word for someone who follows Judaism? (eg: Buddhist for someone following Buddhism). It can't be "Jew" according to you, since that is an ethnic group, and not a religious one.

False dichotomy. Are you trying to play the "they are not a people" game?

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for proving my point.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was recently in contact with a family in southern Germany. One spouse who got the shots came ill, went to the doctor and was not tested for COVID-19. The homemaker (who has not had social contact because of not getting the shots) came ill afterward, was told that a COVID-19 test was required when visiting the doctor, and was tested positive.

So what's happening there is that doctors are deliberately not testing people who have gotten the shots while testing every patient who has not. The purpose is to pervert the data and conceal the fact that they do not work to prevent infection.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would not even go so far as to advocate vague language for planning illegal activities.

▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Note that the plank will take people in the audience with it when it falls.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't see any problems with this so far.

▲ 2 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 2 points ago +2 / -0

The more comments try to scare others about something, the more inclined I am to believe in its legitimacy.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 1 point ago +1 / -0

How are the two images related?

▲ 5 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 5 points ago +5 / -0

False premise. The illogic here is obvious.

by pkvi
▲ 3 ▼
SuicideTruthbomber 3 points ago +3 / -0

The only people who would target groups of people to discourage voting are shills.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›