1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh for fuck sakes, now you're using a book written thousands of years ago as proof? Jesus H Fucking Imbeciles. The stupidity of these types of posts are the essence of being a dumb fuck.

2
savman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Two questions to ask;

  1. Why are bubbles round and not flat?

  2. What compels flat earthers, who have zero formal education, think they are smarter than NASA space engineers?

Flat earthers and moon deniers are fucking retarded morons.

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fucking tool spreading this crap. Mother Jones uses statements by a property developer for 10+ years ago, prior to him being a politician about his bromance? Seriously? The fucking tools who write this shit are hawks who want endless war.

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, because the cost for a Saturn V rocket is exceedingly high and was impossible to keep going. You have to remember that the 70's oil embargo destroyed budgets and the public by and large forced NASA to strip budgets and focus on 're-usable' rocket technology. Thus the Shuttle.

It's easy to think you know all the answers until you realize you're projecting your own bias and idiocy into a proven fact. Man went to the moon and returned with moon rocks.

There is a laser mirror that was placed by the last Apollo mission to make measuring distance possible.

Grow up, be a man and educate yourself to one of man's greatest achievements.

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Smoke goes from ground up. This could easily be a part of the van or any number of things being propelled up and away from the explosion.

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not only is your grammar and punctuation horrible, I have no fucking idea what you just said.

2
savman 2 points ago +2 / -0

What a fuking joke. This moron dives into research that MUST uses base line studies to compare modeling on the REAL round world. Base lines are litterally, if the 'base' was flat - here is what would happen. But because the Earth is round, here is the effect... so stupid these people.

0.17: the report says right below: 'the need for linear models is...'
0:21: a dissertation from a student using a 'flat' model to prove a therory 0:22: they give three examples, the first flat, for the baseline, then round, etc. 0:25: modeling base-line for comparison.

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know, it's like; I love a conspiracy just as much as the next guy, but this isn't even trying to think logically.

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just said earlier; caves, caverns, voids, are one thing and exist, of course, duh. I am saying anyone who advocates for vast hollow 'swiss cheese' earth is out to lunch.

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sorry. I really am.....

   .... But a hollow, swiss cheese earth simply cannot exists due to physics of gravitational forces and pressure.   How are diamonds created?  It's not a question of wanting it to be true. Wouldn't it be awesome if it was?   I think it would.  Could you imagine a whole new realm?  But dude, the only realm of the unknown you will experience is when you die.  That is when the good times start. Trust me, there is no vast inner shell cause it would simply collapse due to extreme forces of pressure, mass, weight. Think like Spock. It's elementary.  
1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Im sort of a hollow earth guy. More or less I believe in major pockets of free space that exist in the earth that would allow for hives of civilizations to exist like an ant colony. A Swiss cheese earth so to speak."

Go seek help, or at a minimum take a geology class.

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh yeah? You must live on top of some world record shit, cause the world's deepest cave is Veryovkina @ 2212 meters

A cave, tunnel or cavern is one thing. A vast hollow earth is another. I stand by my claim that you are a retard for thinking there is a hollow earth,

2
savman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only 1/2 wits say there is no fraud. Go look in the mirror and say "I am cucked by the deep state" repeat and rinse.

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

You need to switch your medication. There are no ant people that are going to rise up. It is 100% physically impossible for the earth to be 'hollow' simply because the pressure from the gravitational forces would collapse any voids. Do you know how much pressure is at the bottom of the ocean? What sort of resistance would be required to support this theory of a hollow earth?

I thought flat earthers were dumb but this is a whole new level of stupidity. For fuck sake.

1
savman 1 point ago +1 / -0

You wonder why they have strict guidelines? Because the pressure would implode the sub. Are you seriously that ignorant?

2
savman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lost me within 10 seconds.

  1. Not one bird species in the Northern or Southern Hemispheres fly towards the poles "before winter". Birds body mass can not tolerate sub-zero temperatures for any length of time since they are warm blooded like you and me. Some birds do adapt; owls, chickadees, but they are not migratory. No 'migrating' bird flies towards the poles. That is 100% bull shit.

  2. There is absolutely no areas of the planet that 'warm' as you go further towards the poles. Where 'forest and lakes' are. How could there be? You don't think this would be explored by now?

  3. Gravity and heat would negate any 'hollow earth' theory. Do you know what happens when you go down? KTB superdeep is the deepest well at 29,859 ft reaching temperatures of more than 260 °C (500 °F) - But these people claims holes 'miles deep' - for fuck sakes, the earth is a molten core of liquid iron. Duh.

The woman narrating this and the people who made this are fucking stupid.

view more: ‹ Prev