So people should not eat spinach, quinoa and other plants that contain ecdysterone because it's lumped into bugs simply because bugs have them too?
What about ecdysterone's characteristic of being an estrogen receptor beta upregulator? That's huge as part of the cycle to metabolise estrogen, thereby helping to thwart breast cancer.
I had only made the disagreement about the ecdysterone, no mentions about chitin. Which is indeed the only argument presented as a way for an onlookers in this comment section to not be scared of ecdysterone.
There's always a complexity when it comes to bio-chemical research. It helps to understand the varying concepts that equate the big picture, not just a small snip-it of something at face value.
Disagreed about ecdysterone.
While yes, it is indeed found in arthropods, it is also found in spinach and quinoa because it's classified as a plant-steroid, as in, it's derived from plants themselves. So, bugs have ecdysterone because they eat plants that contain ecdysterone. And yes, humans can metabolize ecdysterone too.
It's a very critical estrogen receptor beta upregulator that has plethora of functions including anabolic, adaptogenic, hormonal homeostasis, and etc.
Don't just "trust the science" at face value like the twitter post above. That's lazy. Please include your own due diligence to come to your own conclusions.
Potassium iodide, in salt form - 1 tsp is roughly 1.3 grams KI, which equates to roughly 0.950 grams I.
More elemental iodine vs lugol's.
How is 3 months sentence on a child porn case a small subset?
What about all the other sentences or future sentences of the same category? Are they small subsets too Ms. Judge?
What about the victims, the children, and the mothers and fathers who will seemingly need all the help to get over the mental anguish of the perpetrators. Are they small subsets too Ms. Judge?
What about sex crimes in general along with their victims? Are they small subsets too Ms. Judge?
Or, are we, the people questioning your integrity, small subsets too? A nomination to the highest court in the nation would at least suggest some type of due diligence to assess character traits. Is due diligence a small subset of what's expected?
Wouldn't something like an RF, wifi, bluetooth, or other signal detectors work? I've been thinking about this, but haven't really done the complete research or experiments to test it for myself.
Something like this?
Covid19 is real. My theory is that it's just a simplistically modified coronavirus flu virus with spiked protein receptor binding sites akin to HIV. I think it was necessary for this to take place as it would justify a vaccine that would target these spike proteins. We don't know right now if its though malaise, incompetence, or rushing to complete the vaccine, but the definitive issue at hand is people dying from the spike proteins caused by the vaccine.
Ivermectin changes all of that. It simply just binds to the ACE2 receptor site, thereby making the spike protein inactive to cause any damage giving your immune system to detox the spike proteins.
There are trillions of amino acids/proteins in your body, trillions get recycled, or thrown out everyday for whatever reason. But when an amino acid binds to something that it shouldn't, the body just doesn't know what to do with it when the introduction is completely fresh and new. Now exasperate that with constant flowing production of spike proteins, it can be deduced that your immune system just cant keep up without outside help.
The virus is very real, but it's very much tame like the common flu.
The spike proteins, whether felt from vaxxed recipients or shedded towards unvaxxed is also very real. I had the spike proteins myself, took ivermectin horse paste bc i didnt want to go through the rigamarole of trying to find someone that would actually prescribe me. I felt all the symptoms, the worst and most concerning were heavy blood coagulation in my legs. Thats when I knew. Now, i'm back to normal. Believe me or not, my conscious is clear knowing that i have at least shared my experience in hoping to guide others seeking an alternative perspective.
In a war game scenario, think of the virus as the trojan horse. It's tame, doesn't actually do the actual work, but it does inspire the fear propaganda. Then the vaccines come in and the heightened threat levels dissipate and people start relaxing. After a period of seeming normalcy, the real infiltrators come in, the spike proteins. Thats when the most damage is done meanwhile when MSM tries to ban any mentions of ivermectin.
That's classical Machiavelli The Prince, Art of War, and seige warfare tactics or whatever have you from common military history.
Lol, no dude. I'm just arguing that people shouldn't be afraid of ecdysterone because it's literally in spinach and quinoa. That's it.
If they tell me to go to a ditch, I'll question why. Is it a job function, am I part of an engineering team, are we building a bridge, what are the logistics, who are my subcontractors, is it necessary to even cross the ditch, what's the cost to risk benefits analyses model, what's the impact on the local economy, will it improve residential, commercial, or industrial usage, etc, etc.
This is the exact same sentiment I have in my prior replies, there's always a complexity to certain questions, and it really really helps to understand the varying smaller concepts to understand the big picture as a whole. That's real science, that's not authority figure fallacy based science depicted as a snip it memed at face value.