thanks for sharing
The head of WEF police committed suicide the day before the event in 2010: https://www.bitchute.com/video/aJzLO2A3fKfH/
She probably tried to film this a few times and this was the best one..
"The principle of procreative beneficence (PPB) holds that parents or single reproducers are at least prima facie obliged to select the child, out of a range of possible children they might have, who will be likely to lead the best life."
Why not start by having corporations buy the stuff back from us, like returning bottles. It would create a recycle economy that would mostly benefit the lower classes. It would incentivize companies to make products that last longer.
The model they want is designed for everyone to live in a tiny cookie cutter house where you don't have to store anything because you're renting what's there.
I hope you're right. The more people accept that it's real and that it's happening, the better chance we have at stopping it. The idea on their end is to have the general public want it to happen, maybe even beg for it. Let's hope things don't get that bad.
100% agree. Keep in mind that this new economy only works if they have the digital currency. They will need to limit how much you can eat and there's no RFID in steak.
Barter System
They have a system planned with a catchy name that involves reuse, repair, repurpose, etc. The corporations own the actual materials so if it gets stripped down to materials and remade again, it's still owned by that same corporation.
They will decide what we should have for the sake of the environment. Not to mention the quality of it, the amount. All in the name of a more 'equal and fair' planet. You can start to see how you might be eating bugs all of a sudden.
Klaus said that "Stakeholder Capitalism positions private corporations as trustees of society". Which is from the 1973 Davos Manifesto
This isn’t a minimalist lifestyle we’re talking about. Those of us who have a life consider this a declaration of war.
Based on what I'm reading, they would like it to be AI. The difficulty for them, as they put it: AI has no skin in the game so it's not 100% accurate to call it intelligence and autonomy. Your question would become, who will feed the AI it's morals and red lines.
This doc is from a program out of the "Council on Extended Intelligence": https://globalcxi.org/wp-content/uploads/CXI_Essay.pdf
I didn't hear about this. Quick search turns up nothing (not surprising). Any sauce to go with that?
this is awesome. saved!
Good video. I also think we're being made poor for the inevitable 'build back better'. You won't get your recovery dollars unless you and your business follow the Agenda 2030 sustainability guidelines. We probably need another series of lockdowns/measures for that to be really effective. Then WEF says more than 50% of the population will need retraining in 2025 (as per its Education 4.0 plan). Can we assume this will be after the 4th industrial revolution? Web 3.0..
I'm still reading up on their programs as it does shape a rough timeline of events to come.
They are openly planning this 'reset' as per the specifications of the Club of Rome (now Agenda 2030). Not really a conspiracy theory. Given that the elite are having closed door meetings determining the structure of our future, I'd say it's just conspiracy.
This is not going to help with nightmares but here's the whole video from the last clip, skip to 1:30
I also read about this a while back and tracked down this 'Pathway 2050' mural I remembered. This should probably be its own post. They published this in 2010 along with instructions on how to use it.
sauce: http://www.ecpd.org.rs/pdf/2015/books/2018/Maurice_Strong_2018.pdf (page 199)
We have to raise eyebrows about WEF and YGLs. Klaus & co. will try to pass it off as normal, necessary and even desired.
Don't know if you caught my last post on YGLs: https://rumble.com/v11j2dr-wef-young-global-political-leaders.html
He tells you all you need to know right here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/GY2ELawYCt3E/
He didn't pull the number out of thin air. Doesn't have to be 'magical number bs'
They'll use the same arguments but in the name of Health. 'Science' says less people will be shot if we take all legal guns away