▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

You’re the only one incapable of discussion. Ive tried multiple times with you, and only receive screeching in reply.

▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only gnostics get to talk to him, everyone who called him apocryphal gets sent to hell.

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which way do you lean, precursor civilization or the soft bigotry of low expectations?

by pkvi
▲ 4 ▼
Graphenium 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think a lot of it is poisoning of the well by shills, but a lot of it is also just poor saps who’s line of thought goes “NASA constantly lies > therefore everything NASA talks about is a lie > therefore space is fake” and they have professional retards like Eric Dubay to guide them to the poisoned well.

Then they work backwards from the conclusion they want. Space is fake/flat earth are nearly overlapping circles.

▲ 5 ▼
Graphenium 5 points ago +5 / -0

Here is another article which presents a text attributed to Bacon for comparison:

http://www.sirbacon.org/Mather_KJV/Bacon_KJV.html

In addition to providing the “voice” of the KJAV, much points to Bacon having authored the plays commonly attributed to the illiterate stage director, Shakespeare. In addition to the impossibility of someone who’s only actually attributable writing is a will written by someone who is clearly illiterate, the knowledge and intricate understanding of court politics of the time, and history in general, almost rule out the possibility of a poor peasant describing them in such first hand detail.

While a discussion on religion in general can always be interesting, I’d love to learn what others here know about the history of the texts, as opposed to their various interpretations, but if you want to, feel free

▲ 4 ▼
Graphenium 4 points ago +4 / -0

Interesting line of thought. We are our archetypes.

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

You deliberately "misunderstood" and you continue to lie.

Speak for yourself spastic

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

You said:

answering the question of viruses being dead cells instead of lying like a filthy cunt

I said, almost a day ago now:

I don’t think they claim that viruses are dead cells, my understanding of their argument was that when cells in “diseased” tissue (aka tissue suffering toxicosis) die, the body, as part of its homeostatic “clean up operations”, collects this toxic refuse (poisonous substances, and rotting flesh), and bundles it up in what have heretofore been called “viruses”, to aid in flushing it from the body without spreading the waste around and causing further negative effects. This is the thesis of the video, and you will need to actually see their argument in order to have an informed discussion.

Oh golly gosh, what a vile, pernicious lie that was... or wait...there is no lie in the statement. Huh. Almost like you’re acting like a spastic for no reason. Fancy that.

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

You spread flat earth bullshit then lie like a faggot when it's questioned.

I would ask you how you’ve come to this conclusion, because I’ve never posted in support of FE, and infact have done the opposite multiple times. But I know your answer will be to claim this video is “FE bs”, which brings us to your next spastic outburst:

What are you talking about?

I thought it was obvious but if you’re really this stupid I’ll say it yet again:

The video has nothing to do with FE, and your obsession with FE has tarnished your ability to think critically and address the claims made in the video. Which you still haven’t done, and which is largely impossible for you, as you haven’t watched it.

▲ 6 ▼
Graphenium 6 points ago +6 / -0

I really think you need help with your anger, whether that’s a joint a day or a lobotomy I can’t tell you. I can tell you that you haven’t contributed a useful thought to this board in what seems like months. You’ve spent over a day arguing with me about a movie you saw 10% of. You’re incapable of addressing their actual arguments so you just attack people instead, either the uploaders or the people here to discuss the video. I’m done responding until you can present a cogent argument, mainly one that isn’t taking the claims of the video and stuffing them into a context that doesn’t hold them, but actually attempting to discern the truth. In other words, watch the video or go shove a flashlight up your ass.

▲ 4 ▼
Graphenium 4 points ago +4 / -0

And how handy is it that our resident fedposter, OP, was ready and willing to post his 2nd ever non-flatearth post...

I think OP is one of the 20%:

https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/12i4I1dmac/20-of-this-sites-visitors-come-f/c/

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

They do. They then go into a spiel about mold...

Replying “No.” and then changing the subject isn’t how one has a productive discussion

strawberries molding from the bottom

You can’t even repeat their arguments correctly much less argue cogently against them. It isn’t starting “from the bottom” dipshit, they argue that it starts INSIDE the dead/dying organism.

Re:everything else you spewed, I don’t normally say this but get help buddy, I think your environment has poisoned you and rotted away your ability to comprehend and discuss things like a person. This isn’t a video about flat earth, and given your obsession you honestly seem like a forum sliding shill.

▲ 5 ▼
Graphenium 5 points ago +5 / -0

Huh well I think you could offer some really interesting insights and help elucidate if the subjects/specifics they advance have any practical or theoretical applications, I hope you check it out when you get a chance.

▲ 7 ▼
Graphenium 7 points ago +7 / -0

u/davidcoleintrepid

Pinging you here so that an actually discussion can take place, in this thread dedicated to discussion, without the baggage of your earlier comments.

Then focus on their claims that "viruses are dead cells" or "mold develops internally"

I don’t think they claim that viruses are dead cells, my understanding of their argument was that when cells in “diseased” tissue (aka tissue suffering toxicosis) die, the body, as part of its homeostatic “clean up operations”, collects this toxic refuse (poisonous substances, and rotting flesh), and bundles it up in what have heretofore been called “viruses”, to aid in flushing it from the body without spreading the waste around and causing further negative effects. This is the thesis of the video, and you will need to actually see their argument in order to have an informed discussion.

Regarding the claims about mold, I think they are just recontextualizing something that everyone acknowledges, which is that “rot” begins inside a dead (cell/animal), from the microflora naturally present which can now reproduce without the restraint normally imposed by a living beings immune system.

▲ 1 ▼
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Start a new thread with some actual discussion, ping me, and I’d be more than happy to partake. I just think blanket dismissals of things because of perceived issues with the video uploaders ideology are dumb (note, not a word of flat earth is mentioned in the video, so derailing the discussion thread by bitching about it is just as bad or worse than what you think they do).

▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s likely because you’re small minded on topics you’re unfamiliar with. You’re still arguing with me about watching the doc, in a fucking discussion thread for the doc.

▲ 3 ▼
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm having trouble understanding the difference.

Yes, watching the video would assist with that

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

He certainly danced around some big secrets with Big Trouble in Little China

by pkvi
▲ 6 ▼
Graphenium 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah, as if the first of these “popular vote went blue but mUH gErRyMaNdErInG made the EC red” was “the last real election”.

Totally ignoring every president who went against the FED and got brained for it (Lincoln, Garfield, and JFK, among other non presidents)

▲ 5 ▼
Graphenium 5 points ago +5 / -0

Check out “the electric universe”, I think they’re a whole youtube channel now, but that’s the name of their first documentary on the subject. Quite interesting, some of their insights.

It boils down to “the standard model neglects the massively important role that plasma and electromagnetism plays in the universe (4th state of matter, “electrically charged gas”, and the state 99% of all normal matter resides in- aka nebulae and stellar discharge)

What I find funny is the retard who thinks space is fake is acting high and mighty about a theory of space

▲ 5 ▼
Graphenium 5 points ago +5 / -0

No one in the documentary advances the notion germs aren’t real. You need to work on your discernment and self control bro. You used to contribute now you just try to tear down

▲ 7 ▼
Graphenium 7 points ago +7 / -0

Watch the video, no one ever advances the notion “germs don’t exist”

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›