That guy has a better track record as a contributor than you, yet you accuse him of being a shill. Ergo you’re either a fucking retard or a shill yourself. Neither of those lend themselves to productive contributions
You mean... the site we all left because it was bursting at the seams with inauthentic “movements” and astroturfing from fake accounts?
Shut up, if you aren’t a shill all you’re doing is undermining the point of actual subversion by accusing everyone who disagrees with you.
Every single FE “proof” you could ever point to was debunked over a decade ago. Elsewhere.
There is no conspiracy.
The Great Pyramid is a scale model of the Northern Hemisphere
Maybe the goal isn’t some nebulous and undefinable “freedom” but instead fostering a place where generative, productive discussions can occur
/> user has never made a post on c/conspiracies
Fuck I need to start checking that before I respond.
Ehhhh - we all left r*ddit for, among other things, their carebear censorship policies (but I don’t think any of us left because of how Flat Earth was treated there) so I kind of feel we need some leniency on stuff like ending your sentence with “what are you, retarded”. Maybe I’m wrong on that.
But what I can see making sense is the removal (on a gradient obviously) of “one issue posters” - they do fly in the face of the principle of genuine good faith discussion.
I think I’ve seen you on KiA, so i mean someone like imp coming here and only posting his crazy shit about {women} being behind everything wrong with the world. Same for the people who blame their stubbed toe on the bankers, same for the people who derail conversations by trying to shoehorn FE into every single comment they make.
So to combine our points - if someone’s only contribution was derision and derailment, I think they’d do well with some kind of (community? Meta posts? Private? idk) talking to, moving up if they keep things up
But I agree, the approach of “should we ban this topic” seems to have had so many “potential“ drawbacks attached that the core matter got glossed over for a discussion on freedom of speech. However like 800 comments in the vote thread and easily another 200 across other threads shows these are important issues for many/all of us
Their opinion matters less than people actively trying to build the site and the community
It’s so obvious now! How could we “skeptics” and “non-mongoloids” have been so dumb!
Wahoo guys!!!! Bid, I mean Flerlf got 80 million votes!
What we should be doing is endeavoring to ban all bad faith discussion, which is a lot more difficult for sure.
Any ideas/suggestions?
Lots of “no”s - very few “here’s what could work instead”
Ok dude, there’s definitely no problem with the subversion of these spaces by bad actors.
Flat Earthers are the good guys - hell, THEY MIGHT EVEN BE RIGHT!!! WHO KNOWS!!! OBJECTIVE TRUTH? IM NOT EVEN SURE THAT EXISTS!!!
This site is for reading
Sounds like wikipedia...this site is for discussion, which is a two way street (requires contributions from everyone) - and more specifically - productive discussion of actual conspiracies
Are there any conspiracies too retarded for you? Should we let people flood post “birds are robots” posts? Should we let the furries come here and post about a conspiracy to suppress their fursonas? Should we let reddit leftists come here and post about “the racist conspiracy of systematic oppression of the BIPOCLGBTQS7s”?
You’d think a trump supporter would understand the value of borders.
>user has never posted a thread before
Cmon bruh
>the vitriol that's directed at {homosexuals with aids} and {their} supporters makes me wonder...
>user has never posted to c/conspiracies before
Uh huh... lot of that going around these days....
All great users. Certainly head and shoulders above a mental midget like you
>muh aD hOmiNiDS
Wow, sorry, didn’t realize I was talking to such an upstanding champion of logic.
Say champ, why do things seem to fall at 9.8 m/s/s on earth?
Did you or did you not open my profile right after responding to a comment and downvote the first 10+ things you saw?
Is that or is that not the actions of an insecure faggot?
Because it’s exasperating to deal with such obstinant retards, that’s all.
It’s like being a kindergarten teacher but when you try to tell the toddler to stop being retarded he responds with a 4 hour bitchute documentary and calls you a shill.
And right after you did that, I pointed out how nothing you mentioned depends on a flat earth. Now your turn.
How can you possibly have the high ground with your head so far up your ass?
>throw a fit
Lmfao, says the mentally ill spastic who didn’t respond to any of my points and just downvote bombed my profile like an insecure faggot
That’s...your “contribution”?
No wonder you voted neigh lmao, you’ve got a bad case of horsebrain
Have you seen c/ConsumeProduct before?
Wait, you’re calling the noticing of astroturfing and widespread subversion/manipulation which was literally admin endorsed “boogey men”? As if it wasn’t actually a problem?
Lmao