I’m not against vaccines. I’m against vaccine mandates.

In fact, you would need to be functionally retarded to be against vaccines in general after witnessing their effectiveness over 100 years of development.

So ya, Trump endorses the vaccine because he is responsible for it. I don’t have to agree with him. I also don’t have to agree with my pastor when he tells me to wait until marriage before having sex. If I did, it would have been a pretty shitty few wanky decades for me.

So considering Green and Libertarian have as much hope of defeating Democrats as a lump of coal, Trump is better than any Democrat and it only took less than a year to prove it.

It’s been almost a year since he was president and Democrats are still running around in a mad panic trying to find any way to prevent Trump from running for politics again.

That means they are scared as shit that he will be re-elected, and that’s a good enough reason for me to want to see him as President again, if for no other reason as to find out why the are so afraid of him. , and no matter what he does it can’t be worse than what the Democrats are doing to America.

Also... Trump had publicly attended church services multiple times. I don’t think I have even seen Biden in a church.

You’re mistaken to think he ever had a saviour role for me, and probably others.

The role he had was that of an individual the Democrats are terrified of, and frankly that’s enough for me as 2021 ends.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

You ever notice those posts on Reddit like "Hey, r/conspiracy is full of shills, anyone know of other good conspiracy boards?".... well I personally think most of those are posted by glowies and Chinese trying to figure out what other boards they can monitor and shill into garbage.

If you are a good conspiracy theorist, you will be able to find good message boards yourself.

In my opinion, the problem with Jan 6 is that it was leaderless. Proud Boys were intercepted before they even got to the city and in previous protests it was the Proud Boys who kept the protestors organized. I suspect this is why they were kept away from the protests.

The President should never lead any protests, unless like Washington he is prepared to do it with a rifle or a sabre in his hand. This is proof violent overthrow was never planned.

We should be asking where Flynn was (edit: Or Don Jr., or Bannon, or even Steven fuckin Crowder)? Or why Pence failed in his duty to the American people. Or why the Supreme Court failed. Or lower Courts. Or the press. In fact, every tier privately and publicly that was in place to defend liberty and the American way failed on January 6. This is far more concerning than why the President was kept away from a 300,000 strong potential riot.

He actually addressed why he didn't fire Fauci this past week. It was a very political decision, made at a very poor time.

The Jan.6 protestors were in Washington to peacefully protest the steal, at the direction for the President. We now know agents from the FBI and Capitol police were doing everything they could to incite violence by opening gates, opening doors, and calling on protestors to acts of violence. This is the same FBI who keeps losing evidence of pedophilia and showing up at conservative protests dressed up like Klansmen. The FBI is currently working against the American people. The Capitol is "The People's Building" and the People have more right to enter than Senators or Congressmen do, as they are merely representative of The People.

His fan base is attacked daily by the press, by politicians, and big tech. "Right Wing" is being turned into a slur and they have successfully convinced a huge population of the American Republic that support for Trump is the same as supporting Hitler.

We don't. There are individuals absolutely terrified that Trump might win a re-election, so they have spent a fuck ton of money to ensure that posters on forums like this pretend to be conservative and write scathing anti-Trump rhetoric online as frequently as possible, in order to create the illusion that there is an anti-Trump ground swell within the conservative community.

Key Talking points are:

1. Trump gave us the vaccine, and Operation Warp Speed, so why should we trust him.

• because it's like 2020 never happened? In early 2020 when we were all scared as shit of a potential Chinese virus that we saw was collapsing people in the street. I admit that I even bought a few thousand rounds of ammunition, P100 Respirators, and long term storage food just in case everything went to hell. By April 2, Trump was promising that we were through this, and by April 30 2020 he began to re-open the economy despite frantic cries of terror from the press. And just like Trump I assumed the vaccine promised by Big Pharma would be tested and safe, and made available to those who wanted it, and not shoved down our throats by socialist suckers of Chinese cocks. Trump committed his election campaign to Operation WarpSpeed because a crumbling American Economy is more dangerous globally than a virus which can be disposed of with herd immunity supported by effective vaccines, just like Polio and Small Pox. Democrats agreed that conscientious and religious objections to the vaccine were valid and Democrats promoted the idea of rejecting the vaccine due to personal concerns of safety. (there is still video montages of all major Democrats promoting this idea). Trump continues to support the vaccine because it's his baby and he would be a hypocrite if he didn't. If he were to come out against the vaccine as a hazardous injection, he would therefore implicate himself through dangerous negligence, and the press would have a hay day. He continues to speak against vaccine mandates.

2. Trump bailed on the Jan. 6 supporters

• because I suspect the Secret Service was worried about a 300,000 strong riot and placing the Commander in Chief within the middle of this mess is not something the Secret Service does.

3. Trump hasn't supported the Jan 6 protestors who are in prison

• because he is currently being accused of attempting a coup d'etat by members of Senate and Congress, and I suspect his legal team probably doesn't want him giving any statements which the press and corrupted government officials can turn against him.

4. Trump didn't free Assange

• this was a failure of his administration in my opinion, however 4 years of the Trump presidency was spent fighting a false accusation of Russian interference with the aid of Wikileaks, and any support of Assange would have lent more ammunition to the false allegations.

5. Trump didn't arrest Hillary

• see point 4.

6. Trump-Epstein-Maxwell

• Both Epstein and Maxwell were arrested during the Trump presidency. It's becoming clearer every day that the FBI is a compromised institution in the USA. The FBI is responsible for losing the following computers: Seth Rich's, the DNC's, Anthony Weiner's, Hunter Biden's, and now we discover that they have also "lost" all of the data found in Epstein's NY mansion. The FBI also invented evidence in order to arrest Flynn, and support the lies created by the DNC regarding Russian collusion.

So, the institution who's job it is to maintain law and order across state lines now appears to be working against the best interests of the American people, and that's a very big accusation for a President to make when Congress and Senate are hostile to the President, and the institutions of Law and Order are corrupted by the very people who need to be arrested.

And this is the tip of the Iceberg. We have also discovered that the Joint Chiefs of Staff were not loyal to the President or the USA, as the Chairman committed treason when he promised China to warn them of any impending Nuclear strikes.

We also know the CIA has been corrupted for decades, and have been abusing their authority against the American people, and have embezzled likely billions of dollars in order to promote their own ideology and enrich themselves whenever possible.

The NSA is equally as corrupted as the CIA, and have supported every illegal action the CIA has taken in order to maintain "security" within the USA.

The press has demonstrated that they have no vested interest in maintaining the democratic institutions of the USA, and instead have decided that they themselves are the judges of law and order, and insist the courts rule according to their doctrine.

Big Tech continues to violate the principles of the Constitution, and hide behind corporate protection laws. These institutions are run and funded by foreign entities yet spend most of their time attempting to steer and guide US political doctrine.

So when the Command structure of the US military, law enforcement, intelligence, the courts, the press, and big tech all uniformly commit treason and turn against the duly elected President of the USA, and representative of the People, how much power can the President wield and how much can he accomplish without the support of the very power structure of the country?

Here's what is clear to me: Trump is a businessman and entertainer. He was never a soldier, nor a commander. I think he is genuine for his love of country and the values the Constitution stands for, but he was too weak or maybe not creative enough to find ways to overcome the American system which has become infested with socialist corruption (because infesting democracies is what socialist corruption does best). He is still a loyal American and certainly not part of the Socialist club, and the Socialist club is doing everything they possibly can to ensure a loyal patriotic American does not sit as president again before they attain their goals as glorious Socialist leaders for life. He ain't the best but he is what they are afraid of, so I would vote for him if I had the opportunity.

And there is a shit ton of them reading this right now getting paid to post counter comments on Conspiracies.win.

Socialist states promote atheism because religion takes maintenance of moral values away from the state and entrusts it to a third party.

The Protestant revolution took understanding of morality away from the Catholic Church and gave it to the people.

The people are the best judges of their own morality, but they still need an instruction manual, and that's what a properly implemented and benevolent religious system grants them, and that's why Socialists hate it.

I'm at a point in my life where I realize that kids with blue and green hair, or who still live at their parents house with their video games, will be the ones I hope will carry the rifles and bayonets.

Fuck.

a) this Wikileaks "dump" is an open directory of Wikileaks files, which has been available since before Pizzagate.

b) every once in a while someone discovers this directory and propagates threads like "Breaking!!! Wikileaks drops all its files!!!" on every available web site that hosts message boards.

c) this happens frequently enough now, that it's beginning to glow.

I'm actually at the point now where I'm beginning to think the site may be an IP gathering honeypot.

Here is a bunch of sketches that pre-date British occupation

And Here is Herodotus’s “Account of Egypt”

Well if it’s Herodotus, he is “The Father of History” so pretty much everyone who followed him could fact check whether or not the pyramids existed.

That leaves about 2400 years for someone to figure out the bluff before the British might have built the pyramids.

Also Napoleon, who was at war with England at the time, had captured Egypt in the 1790s, which is where we got the Rosetta Stone from. Napoleon would have no motivation to cover up for a British plan to build pyramids. We have sketches and paintings of the Sphinx and Great pyramid, and architectural data from Napoleons engineers regarding the pyramids.

There is A LOT of holes to plug with the theory the British built the pyramids. So I think it’s an interesting concept, but unless there is something more than theory supporting it, we just have to assume they existed before British occupation.

I'm willing to entertain the idea, but how do you explain written accounts by Herodotus (450bc-ish)and Diodorus (50bc-ish) whop both wrote descriptions of the pyramids?

Also, there were a lot of other Roman, Greek, Arab, and medieval authors who wrote about them.

So, if we are going with the idea that the British built them in the 1800's there would need to be a very good explanation for previous written accounts.

Check out the Oera Linda Book which claims to be a book written by people who may have inhabited areas of Doggerland in European pre-history (2000bc or earlier).

Its provenance is a little Sketchy, by there is compelling evidence that at least parts of the book might have been written in the 1200's.

Wasn't one of the last r/pizzagate posts the one from a guy who claimed to be a journalist?

I have Origins of the Sphinx by Schoch and Bauval which is a good read. The newest version also gives a lot of detail on how much of a whack job Hawas is.

Saved to watch later!

I'm pretty convinced ancient Egyptians stumbled across the Pyramid culture and squatted on their stuff, and then claimed it as their own. Even within parts of their own history ancient Egyptians said they weren't there first, and they documented a huge chunk of their own pre-history in the Turin King List, which dates occupation of Egypt back 36,000 years (or so).

I think modern, post-Rosetta stone, Egyptians have tied a lot of their self-identity to being "THE FIRST" civilization. This idea is fundamental to how they view themselves, and they have even found ways to reconcile this belief within their views of Islam. It's super important to Egyptians that they were first, because frankly they haven't offered anything else of value to the planet since Rome stopped giving a shit about their wheat crops.

So, I believe shit-bags like Zawi Hawas and other like minded individuals in Egyptology have been actively suppressing information which may indicate that another older civilization, who were distinctly not-Egyptian, built most of the massive monuments in the Nile Valley.

If you look at many of the monuments, hieroglyphs appear to either be engraved in a manner way more shitty than the monument was built, or they simply added a plaster outer casing to the monument and added their writing on top.

Egyptians weren't afraid to erase elements of their own history, as we have seen with how they treated Akhenaten/Amenhotep and Nefertiti.

To go a little further with this idea, I'm also convinced that any culture that might have built the pyramids likely also inhabited a huge chunk of what is now the Sahara desert. Post flood, the region was lush with wildlife and greenery and remained this way from about 8,500 BC to 5,500 BC. Around 4,000 BC the Egyptians document their first Dynastic pharos.

Personally, I think 50'-100' below the sand across the entire Sahara region we might find evidence of a super-culture who might have lived on the banks and rivers of what is now called Mega Lake Chad. I think it might have been these people who developed quickly following the 9,500 BC flood event and spread across North Africa, eventually building settlements in what is modern day Egypt and any evidence Egyptians may have found has been quickly squirreled away.

On the upside, if I am right, there is a lot of desert to be excavated that isn't under control of the Department of Egyptian Antiquities.

Oh... and then there is Doggerland. But that's another long winded post I don't feel like writing about right now, lol.

TLDR; I think Egyptians are squatters in mega structures built by a culture who previously lived in an area of the Sahara now covered by sand.

I don’t care where a man finds his god. It’s none of my business. I care that he has the right to choose his god freely and without predjudice. I can argue with the muslim supremist in a society that respects free speech and individual rights, and convince that person his wants and needs are pretty much the same as mine, but I can’t do that when a fuerer or “great leader” is dictating what rights they think are better for me than others.

The Nazi crimes, Soviet crimes, Jewish crines, and Chinese crimes are all crines against humanity. They are crimes against our inalienable right to exist, and all of these crimes should be punished.

The simple fact that there were Jews who were actually good and righteous people, regardless of their beliefs, died to further some infantile political belief structure should be an outrage to anyone that believes in freedoom, liberty, and the rights of man. Just like I din’t give a fuck what belief structure the average Uyghur has, all I care about is that some honest dude is having his wife fucked by a stranger because the CCP doesn’t think he should be a muslim.

Sure and so did the British and literally every other state victorious in battle and who kept prisoners of war. Scotland had Italian prisoners build submarine barricades in the North Sea. Eventually that forced labor returned to Scotland because it didn’t suck like late 1940’s Italy did.

And slavery as reported by Allied soldiers like great uncles I have known and grandparents I’ve spoken to. As far as camps go, no one, including modern day Nazi edge lords, disagrees they were at-minimum forced labor camps. No one denies countless lives were lost due to malnutrician and disease. Whether or not mass murder was commited is for a totally different discussion, but whether or not crimes against humanity were commited isn’t in question by anyone other than the retarded.

As far as China goes, they are Nationalist, and Socialist, and not Communalist, so ya, they are quite literally modern day Nazis. For God’s sake, Xi even had a sham vote in the Chinese congress(?) (Parlaiment? Whatever they call it) to make him leader for life in the exact same way Hitler did. Like, literally almost identical actions. The economies of pre war Germany and modern day China are nearly identical in structure except China has the advantage of modern technologies and post war understanding to make a foundation upon. The similarities between the two nations when you really examine it are startling. Except China can’t inovate worth a shit, but that’s because of centuries of subservience and not National Socialism.

Isreal is Nationalist, but I wouldn’t call them Socialist. They are more a weird type of Repulican Fascist than anything, and they need to be held to account for their crimes against humanity regarding the Palestinian population.

Finally regarding America, the strength of a Democratic Republic is that its values lay within those of the people, and “the people” are generally good when making laws for themselves. Up until the 1960s race laws in the USA were barbaric, and sacks of shit like Henry Ford thought they were fuckin awesome, the strength of the Consituttion finally overcame backwards thinking and the ideals of “Freedom and Equality for All” won the vote for Women and Blacks, and continues to protect the sanctity of ones body and right to choose what you do with your life.

Neither Hitler, Stalin, or Xi promises that shit my friend.

It most certainly has forced labour, what are you talking about?? Perhaps you missed the slave camps reported by allied soldiers in Germany or slave factories in modern day Nationlist Socialist China?

It also has forced production content and quotas which is why Germany was producing fuckin toasters until 1944 because they desperately wanted to convey a sense of “don’t worry we lost in Russia” to the German “Folk”. Fuckin Berliners were convinced the Russians were in retreat until days before the fall of Berlin. After that came the rape, by the way. Modern day Chinese are told what to produce and how much.

Don’t fool yourself there was anything approaching a free market in 1930’s - 1940’s Germany or in modern day China.

Thanks Comrade.

No, every Socialist that wants to harness national labour for their own self interest and luxury, and convince the nation it’s in their own best interest... is a Nazi.

The average Hans and Gretel didn’t enjoy those fine masters art pieces after ratting out their neighbors.